05/10/2001 the ima special event: vladimir keilis-borok 80th birthday festschrift 1 rise of...
Post on 20-Dec-2015
212 views
TRANSCRIPT
05/10/2001 The IMA Special Event: Vladimir Keilis-Borok 80th Birthday Festschrift
1
Rise of activity, i.e. inverse Rise of activity, i.e. inverse cascading, at the approach of cascading, at the approach of an extreme eventan extreme event
Vladimir Kossobokov
International Institute of Earthquake Prediction Theory and Mathematical Geophysics,
Russian Academy of Sciences,
79-2 Warshavskoye Shosse, Moscow 113556, Russian Federation
Institute de Physique du Globe de Paris,
4 Place Jussieu, 75252 Paris, Cedex 05, France
E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected]
05/10/2001 The IMA Special Event: Vladimir Keilis-Borok 80th Birthday Festschrift
2
OutlineOutline
Universality of multiple fracturing and cascading activity Example: The longest sequence of “starquakes” on Soft Gamma Repeater, SGR1806-20
Cascading of earthquakes by far more
diverse than a power-law family yet it implies…… Earthquake PredictionWhat stands behind?
05/10/2001 The IMA Special Event: Vladimir Keilis-Borok 80th Birthday Festschrift
3
05/10/2001 The IMA Special Event: Vladimir Keilis-Borok 80th Birthday Festschrift
4
SeismicSeismicbackgroundbackground
A 5000-km segment of the area where the standard versions of M8 and MSc algorithms were setup for real-time monitoring.
05/10/2001 The IMA Special Event: Vladimir Keilis-Borok 80th Birthday Festschrift
5
1992/011992/01
05/10/2001 The IMA Special Event: Vladimir Keilis-Borok 80th Birthday Festschrift
6
1992/071992/07
05/10/2001 The IMA Special Event: Vladimir Keilis-Borok 80th Birthday Festschrift
7
1993/011993/01
05/10/2001 The IMA Special Event: Vladimir Keilis-Borok 80th Birthday Festschrift
8
1993/071993/07
05/10/2001 The IMA Special Event: Vladimir Keilis-Borok 80th Birthday Festschrift
9
1994/011994/01
05/10/2001 The IMA Special Event: Vladimir Keilis-Borok 80th Birthday Festschrift
10
1994/071994/07
05/10/2001 The IMA Special Event: Vladimir Keilis-Borok 80th Birthday Festschrift
11
1995/011995/01
05/10/2001 The IMA Special Event: Vladimir Keilis-Borok 80th Birthday Festschrift
12
1995/071995/07
05/10/2001 The IMA Special Event: Vladimir Keilis-Borok 80th Birthday Festschrift
13
1996/011996/01
05/10/2001 The IMA Special Event: Vladimir Keilis-Borok 80th Birthday Festschrift
14
1996/071996/07
05/10/2001 The IMA Special Event: Vladimir Keilis-Borok 80th Birthday Festschrift
15
1997/011997/01
05/10/2001 The IMA Special Event: Vladimir Keilis-Borok 80th Birthday Festschrift
16
1997/071997/07
05/10/2001 The IMA Special Event: Vladimir Keilis-Borok 80th Birthday Festschrift
17
1998/011998/01
05/10/2001 The IMA Special Event: Vladimir Keilis-Borok 80th Birthday Festschrift
18
1998/071998/07
05/10/2001 The IMA Special Event: Vladimir Keilis-Borok 80th Birthday Festschrift
19
1999/011999/01
05/10/2001 The IMA Special Event: Vladimir Keilis-Borok 80th Birthday Festschrift
20
1999/071999/07
05/10/2001 The IMA Special Event: Vladimir Keilis-Borok 80th Birthday Festschrift
21
2000/012000/01
05/10/2001 The IMA Special Event: Vladimir Keilis-Borok 80th Birthday Festschrift
22
2000/012000/01
The M8-MSc prediction pinpoints the epicenter and aftershocks of the 4 June 2000, Ms8.0 Southern Sumatera earthquake.
05/10/2001 The IMA Special Event: Vladimir Keilis-Borok 80th Birthday Festschrift
23
SGR1806-20 sequenceSGR1806-20 sequence
Soft-Gamma-Repeater 1806-20 is the source in Sagittarius, from which more than a hundred X-ray pulsations have been detected. Its location on the sky (1806-20 refer to celestial coordinates: 18 hours 06 minutes right ascension,
-20 degrees declination) is near the Galactic center, which is 25,000 light years away.
The energy of one burst varies from 1.4·1040
erg to 5.3·1041 erg (the largest earthquakes release about 1026 erg).
05/10/2001 The IMA Special Event: Vladimir Keilis-Borok 80th Birthday Festschrift
24
Common general featuresCommon general features
A fundamental property of multiple fracturing is the power-law distribution of energy log10N(E) = a + b·log10E
(Gutenberg-Richter relation)
05/10/2001 The IMA Special Event: Vladimir Keilis-Borok 80th Birthday Festschrift
25
Symptoms of transition Symptoms of transition to the main ruptureto the main rupture
Escalation of fracturing lasting nearly 1000 days and culminated with the largest starquake on November 16
The power-law increase of activity, e.g. Benioff strain release (t), with a possible trace of the four log-periodic oscillations.
05/10/2001 The IMA Special Event: Vladimir Keilis-Borok 80th Birthday Festschrift
26
Seismic premonitory patternsSeismic premonitory patterns
Pattern E2/3 Keilis-Borok & Malinovskaya, 1964
Pattern B Keilis-Borok, Knopoff & Rotwain, 1980
M8 algorithm Keilis-Borok & Kossobokov, 1990
05/10/2001 The IMA Special Event: Vladimir Keilis-Borok 80th Birthday Festschrift
27
SSimilarity of starquakes and imilarity of starquakes and earthquakesearthquakes
Qualitative so far Gutenberg-Richter relation Premonitory changes Decay of “aftershocks” – Omori power-law
Starquakes evidence drastic expansion of the Realm of Multiple Fracturing previously observed from the lithosphere of the Earth to laboratory samples
Kossobokov, Keilis-Borok & Cheng, 2000
05/10/2001 The IMA Special Event: Vladimir Keilis-Borok 80th Birthday Festschrift
28
How to explain such similarity?How to explain such similarity?
The simplest answer is –The simplest answer is –Multiple fracturing reflects scenarios
of critical transition, common for a broader class of non-linear systems
Turcotte, 1995. Fractals and Chaos in Geophysics.
Newman, Gabrielov, & Turcotte, editors. 1994. Nonlinear Dynamics and
Predictability of Geophysical Phenomena.
05/10/2001 The IMA Special Event: Vladimir Keilis-Borok 80th Birthday Festschrift
29
Cascading of earthquakesCascading of earthquakes
Apparently more complicated than so far suggested power-laws…
05/10/2001 The IMA Special Event: Vladimir Keilis-Borok 80th Birthday Festschrift
30
Bowman, Ouillon, Sammis, Sornette, & Sornette, 1998Bowman, Ouillon, Sammis, Sornette, & Sornette, 1998 It is still unclear if “the best fit”
is random… ?Free parameters:
dT, Mc, aftershocks
05/10/2001 The IMA Special Event: Vladimir Keilis-Borok 80th Birthday Festschrift
31
Zoller, Hainzl Zoller, Hainzl
& Kurths, 2001& Kurths, 2001
Does “the best fit” fit
data points
?
05/10/2001 The IMA Special Event: Vladimir Keilis-Borok 80th Birthday Festschrift
32
Does “the best fit” fit
data points
?
Romashkova & Romashkova &
Kossobokov, 2001Kossobokov, 2001
05/10/2001 The IMA Special Event: Vladimir Keilis-Borok 80th Birthday Festschrift
33
Cascading of earthquakesCascading of earthquakes
… detectable by reproducible earthquake prediction methods
Case histories of the recent earthquakes of magnitude 8 or above prove it and evidence consecutive stages of inverse cascading of seismic activity to the main shock.
05/10/2001 The IMA Special Event: Vladimir Keilis-Borok 80th Birthday Festschrift
34
Worldwide performance of earthquake prediction algorithms M8 and M8-MSc:
Magnitude 8.0 or more.
The significance level estimates use the most conservative measure of the alarm volume accounting for empirical distribution of epicenters.
Test period
Large earthquakes
Total Predicted by
M8 M8-MSc
Percentage of alarms
M8 M8-MSc
Significance, %
M8 M8-MSc
1985-2001
1992-2001
9 8 7
7 6 5
34.9 18.0
30.2 15.3
99.86 99.98
99.61 99.87
05/10/2001 The IMA Special Event: Vladimir Keilis-Borok 80th Birthday Festschrift
35
How earthquake prediction How earthquake prediction methods work?methods work?
“Predicting earthquakes is as easy as one-two-three. Step 1: Deploy your precursor detection
instruments at the site of the coming earthquake. Step 2: Detect and recognize the precursors. Step 3: Get all your colleagues to agree and then
publicly predict the earthquake through approved channels.”
Scholz, C.H., 1997. Whatever happened to earthquake prediction. Geotimes, 42(3), 16-19
Routine seismological data bases, e.g. US GS/NEIC
Reproducible intermediate-term algorithms, e.g. M8
Number of earthquakes have been predicted
05/10/2001 The IMA Special Event: Vladimir Keilis-Borok 80th Birthday Festschrift
36
What stands behind?What stands behind?
… Of course, the correct answer
is very uncertain
Geophysics is lacking continuous data over extended areas and times.
Hopefully, their collection has started.
05/10/2001 The IMA Special Event: Vladimir Keilis-Borok 80th Birthday Festschrift
37
One example from ENE off TibetOne example from ENE off Tibet
An ULF electromagnetic signal around 21 July 1995, M5.7, Yong Deng (China) earthquake
05/10/2001 The IMA Special Event: Vladimir Keilis-Borok 80th Birthday Festschrift
38
Schematic representation of Schematic representation of the electromagnetic station at Song Shanthe electromagnetic station at Song Shan
Two independent, 110 and 250 m long, lines
05/10/2001 The IMA Special Event: Vladimir Keilis-Borok 80th Birthday Festschrift
39
Frequency-Time diagrams for the NS 250 m lineFrequency-Time diagrams for the NS 250 m line
05/10/2001 The IMA Special Event: Vladimir Keilis-Borok 80th Birthday Festschrift
40
Signal evolutionSignal evolutionBoth Intensity and Period
GROW
05/10/2001 The IMA Special Event: Vladimir Keilis-Borok 80th Birthday Festschrift
41
The signal start The signal start and collapseand collapse
The Yong Deng earthquake has occurred in a near vicinity of electromagnetic observations at the time when the characteristic ULF and/or its exponential show decrease, on the component pointing at epicenter.
The start of the ULF decrease was accompanied with a seismic activation of associate segment of Haiyuan fault system.
The collapse of the characteristic ULF happened before the Yong Deng aftershocks vanished exponentially.
05/10/2001 The IMA Special Event: Vladimir Keilis-Borok 80th Birthday Festschrift
42
ConclusionConclusion
… an obvious one -More seismological and other data
should be analyzed systematically to establish reliable correlations between the occurrence of extreme earthquakes and observable geophysical phenomena
05/10/2001 The IMA Special Event: Vladimir Keilis-Borok 80th Birthday Festschrift
43
This presentation was supported from the ISTC grant #1538.This presentation was supported from the ISTC grant #1538.
Bufe and Varnes, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 9,871-9,883, 1993 Global Hypocenters Data Base CD‑ROM, version III, 1994. NEIC/USGS, Denver,
CO. and its PDE and QED updates) Healy, Kossobokov, and Dewey, U. S. Geol. Surv. OFR 92-401, 1992. Keilis-Borok and Kossobokov. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 61:73-83, 1990 Keylis-Borok and Malinovskaya. J. Geophys. Res. 69: 3019-3024, 1964. Kossobokov, Keilis-Borok and Cheng, 2000. Phys. Rev. E, 61: 3529-3533 Kossobokov, Keilis-Borok, Romashkova, and Healy. Phys. Earth and Planet.
Inter., 111, 3-4: 187-196, 1999. Kossobokov, Keilis-Borok, and Smith. J. Geophys. Res., 95: 19763-19772, 1990. Romashkova and Kossobokov, Comput. Seismol., 32: 162-189, 2001. Sadovsky (Ed.). Long-Term Earthquake Prediction: Methodological
Recommendations, Moscow: Inst. Phys. Earth, 127 p. (in Russian), 1986. Varnes, Pure Appl. Geophys. 130, 661–686, 1989 Zlotnicki, Kossobokov and Le Mouël, 2001. Tectonophysics, 334, 3-4: 259-270