04-d-125, chemistry and metallurgy research building replacement (cmrr)...

Weapons Activities/RTBF/Construction/ 04-D-125, CMR Building Replacement Project, LANL FY 2012 Congressional Budget

04-D-125, Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Building Replacement (CMRR) Project, Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, New Mexico

Project Data Sheet (PDS) is for Construction

1. Significant Changes The CMRR project will construct two principal structures in three project phases. The first phase provides funding to construct the Radiological Laboratory/Utility/Office Building (RLUOB). The second phase, the RLUOB Equipment Installation (REI) effort, procures and installs the Special Facility Equipment (SFE) for the RLUOB. The third phase constructs the Nuclear Facility (NF). This data sheet presents the budget, costs, baselines and activities for each of the three phases separately. RLUOB: The most recent DOE O 413.3B approved Critical Decision (CD) is a tailored CD-4, Approve Project Closeout, approved on June 24, 2010. The RLUOB was baselined in 2005 with a TPC of $164,000. Construction of the building structure and related systems has been successfully completed; the facility will begin operations at the conclusion of the next phase of the CMRR project (REI). REI: The most recent DOE O 413.3B approved CD is CD-2/3, Approve Performance Baseline and Start of Construction, approved on July 17, 2009 with a TPC of $199,400 and a CD-4 date of April 30, 2013. This phase of the project is underway. At REI CD-4, the RLOUB will be functionally complete and turned over to operations. Project performance will be assessed with the completion of both RLUOB and REI for a combined total cost of $363,400. NF: The most recent DOE O 413.3B approved CD is CD-1, Approve Alternative Selection and Cost Range that was approved on May 18, 2005 with a preliminary cost range of $745,000- $975,000 and CD-4 in FY 2013. In April 2010, the CMRR Los Alamos National Security LLC (LANS) contractor completed an updated cost range estimate that reflected 45 percent engineering design maturity, changes in the assumptions for site seismic data, incorporation of lessons learned from previous nuclear projects in nuclear quality assurance construction, resolution of safety concerns identified by the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, and incorporation of commercial data on material costs and estimated escalation assumptions. The updated LANS cost range estimate based on 45 percent design is between $3,710,000 and $5,860,000, and is under review by NNSA. The CMRR project team continues to work with the DOE Office of the Chief Financial Officer (CFO), the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the Department of Defense (DoD) Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation (CAPE) office to provide independent validation of the updated cost range estimate provided by LANS. In September 2010, the USACE completed a review of the methods and procedures used to develop estimates for CMRR design efforts resulting in improvements for transparency in the provided estimate. These improvements are applicable to the overall project estimation effort. The USACE will continue to work with the project team in future reviews. The DoD CAPE office will conduct an independent cost review in FY 2011. Following reconciliation of the series of independent cost reviews, NNSA will establish an updated cost range estimate that will reflect approximately 45 percent design maturity. Additional reviews and updates to cost range estimates are anticipated as the design continues to mature. Consistent with

Page 225


NNSA’s increased emphasis on project management rigor, baseline cost and schedule will not be finalized until the project achieves 90 percent design maturity. For FY 2012 and the outyears, Construction and Other Project Costs (OPC) are shown as To Be Determined (TBD). Estimates will be finalized once the project has achieved 90 percent design maturity and baseline approval. In the FY 2012 request, the Total Project Cost totals include both Construction and OPC and the TPC request will appear on the construction line item in the budget narrative and on supporting tables. As represented in the FY 2012 request, Construction and OPC funds will be executed through the line item. Funds will be obligated and recorded in the appropriate object classes (object class 32.0 and 25.4) as defined in Office of Management and Budget Circular A-11. A Federal Project Director at the appropriate level has been assigned to this project. This PDS is an update of the FY 2011 PDS. Section 6 contains the CMRR estimate provided in the FY 2011 PDS as the Previous Total Estimate. The TBD references included in the Current Total Estimate reflect ongoing efforts to refine this estimate and develop a baseline for the Nuclear Facility.

2. Design, Construction, and D&D Schedule

(fiscal quarter or date)

CD-0 CD-1 PED

Complete CD-2 CD-3 CD-4 D&D StartD&D

Completea FY 2004 7/16/2002 1QFY2004 3QFY2006 2 QFY2004 1QFY2011 N/A N/A FY 2005 7/16/2002 3QFY2004 3QFY2007 3 QFY2005 3QFY2012 N/A N/A FY 2006 7/16/2002 2QFY2005 1QFY2007 4 QFY2005 1 QFY2006 4QFY2010 N/A N/A FY 2007 7/16/2002 9/30/2005 2QFY2007 1 QFY2006 1 QFY2006 1QFY2013 N/A N/A FY 2008 7/16/2002 9/30/2005 2QFY2009 10/21/2005 1QFY2006 1QFY2013 N/A N/A FY 2009 7/16/2002 9/30/2005 3QFY2010 TBD TBD TBD N/A N/A FY 2010 7/16/2002 9/30/2005 3QFY2011 TBD TBD TBD N/A N/A RLUOB Facility


CD-0 CD-1 PED


CompleteFY 2011 7/16/2002 5/18/2005 N/A 10/21/2005 10/21/2005 2/28/2010 N/A N/A FY 2012 7/16/2002 5/18/2005 N/A 10/21/2005 10/21/2005 6/24/2010 N/A N/A RLUOB Equipment Installation


CD-0 CD-1 PED


CompleteFY 2011 7/16/2002 5/18/2005 1 2/19/2007 7 /17/2009 7/17/2009 4/30/2013 N/A N/A FY 2012 7/16/2002 5/18/2005 1 2/19/2007 7 /17/2009 7/17/2009 4/30/2013 N/A N/A

a CMR D&D is not part of the CMRR project scope and will not be initiated until final start-up of CMRR Nuclear Facility operations, currently projected to occur no earlier than FY 2022. Inclusion of CMR D&D in the FY 2012 budget request is premature.

26


Nuclear Facility (fiscal quarter or date)

CD-0 CD-1 PED


CompleteFY 2011 7/16/2002 5/18/2005 12/19/2007 TBD TBD TBD N/A N/A FY 2012 7/16/2002 5/18/2005 12/19/2007 4Q FY2012 4Q FY2012 TBD N/A N/A CD-1 – Approve Alternative Selection and Cost Range CD-2 – Approve Performance Baseline CD-3 – Approve Start of Construction CD-4 – Approve Start of Operations or Project Closeout D&D Start – Start of Demolition & Decontamination (D&D) work D&D Complete – Completion of D&D work

3. Baseline and Validation Status

(dollars in thousands)

TEC, PED

TEC, Final Design/

Construction TEC, Total OPC

Except D&D OPC, D&D OPC, Total TPC

FY 2004 N/A N/A 500,000 100,000 N /A N /A 600,000 FY 2005 N/A N/A 500,000 100,000 N /A N /A 600,000 FY 2006 N/A N/A 750,000 100,000 N /A N /A 850,000 FY 2007 N/A N/A 738,097 100,000 N /A N /A 838,097 FY 2008 65,939 672,158 738,097 100,000 N /A N /A 838,097 FY 2009 TBD TBD TBD TBD N/A TBD TBD FY 2010 65,138 TBD TBD TBD N/A TBD TBD RLOUB Facility


TEC, PED

TEC, Final Design/



FY 2011 N/A 159,130 159,130 4,870 N/A 4,870 164,000 FY 2012 N/A 159,130 159,130 4,870 N/A 4,870 164,000 RLUOB Equipment Installation


TEC, PED

TEC, Final Design/



FY 2011 N/A 152,900 152,900 46,500 N/A 46,500 199,400 FY 2012 N/A 152,900 152,900 46,500 N/A 46,500 199,400

Page 227


Nuclear Facility (dollars in thousands)

TEC, PED

TEC, Final Design/



FY 2011 65,138 TBD TBD TBD N/A TBD TBD

FY 2012

65,138 3,239,862-5,169,862

3,305,000 – 5,235,000

405,000-625,000 N/ A

405,000-625,000

3,710,000 -5,860,000

4. Project Description, Justification, and Scope

Project Description The CMRR Project seeks to relocate and consolidate mission critical analytical chemistry, material characterization (AC/MC), and actinide research and development (R&D) capabilities, as well as providing special nuclear material (SNM) storage and large vessel handling capabilities to ensure continuous national security mission support capabilities at LANL. Justification In January 1999, the NNSA approved a strategy for managing risks at the CMR Building. This strategy recognized that the 50-year-old CMR Facility could not continue to support its mission at an acceptable level of risk to public and worker health and safety without operational restrictions. In addition, the strategy committed NNSA and LANL to manage the existing CMR Building to a planned end of life and to develop long-term facility and site plans to replace and relocate CMR capabilities elsewhere at LANL as necessary to maintain support of national security missions. The CMR capabilities are currently substantially restricted; additionally, in order to reduce costs and risks in operating the aging CMR facility, wing consolidation has occurred. These operational restrictions preclude the full implementation of the level of operations DOE/NNSA requires as documented through the Record of Decision for the 2008 LANL Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement, and in the 2008 Complex Transformation Supplemental Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement. The CMRR project will relocate mission-critical CMR capabilities at LANL to Technical Area (TA)-55 near the existing Plutonium Facility (Building PF-4). The CMRR Project will also provide for SNM storage capabilities in order to sustain national security missions at LANL, and reduce risks to the public and workers. Scope The CMRR project consists of designing, constructing and achieving operational readiness for two discrete facilities to meet the national security missions assigned to LANL. RLUOB: Construction of a facility to house laboratory space of approximately 19,500 net square

feet capable of handling radiological quantities of SNM; a utility building sized to provide utility services (including chilled and hot water, potable hot/cold water, compressed air, and process gases) for all CMRR facility elements; office space for CMRR workers located outside of perimeter security protection systems; and space for centralized TA-55 training activities. The RLUOB becomes fully functional and operational after the completion of the equipment installation effort for this facility in the REI phase.

REI: Equipment installation includes gloveboxes, hoods, AC/MC instrumentation, security and communication hardware, and final facility tie-ins and operational readiness/turnover activities. The

Page 228


performance baseline for the RLUOB Equipment Installation effort was approved on July 17, 2009. Funding for the design, procurement, and installation/construction of the RLUOB equipment installation portion is supported through this data sheet.

NF: Consists of the design, construction, and operational readiness of approximately 22,500 net

square feet of Hazard Category II, Security Category I nuclear laboratory space for analytical chemistry/material characterization and actinide research and development operations. Additionally, this facility will include SNM Storage and space to accommodate large vessel handling. Initial site utilities and construction support activities and all associated Special Facilities Equipment (SFE) for the NF, which includes gloveboxes, hoods, and materials transfer system, will be addressed in the baseline for the NF. The CMRR NF capabilities support virtually all nuclear programs at LANL, including pit certification and surveillance, pit manufacturing, and waste operations. Additionally, the CMRR NF will operate in an integrated fashion with the existing PF-4 facility to incorporate production efficiencies and minimize operating costs. The opportunity to improve performance in both the engineering and construction activities will continue to be evaluated to optimize cost and schedule performance.

In FY 2012, funding will be used for RLUOB equipment fabrication, installation, testing, and acceptance. This work will be physically completed by the end of FY 2012, with a transition to operations by 3Q FY 2013. In FY 2012, funds will also be used to advance the design of the NF. Safety concerns for the NF previously identified by the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB) were certified as resolved by the two agencies (DNFSB and NNSA) on September 14, 2009. To enable completion of dedicated NF design, design engineering and analysis will continue for a select number of safety components by manufacturers. Since the NF requires such a large effort, during FY 2011 within this Project Data Sheet, the project team is exploring options of dividing some of the work into smaller, more manageable, subprojects. These activities may include procurement/modification of site utilities, construction support infrastructure, and soil improvement work. No funding will be used for these purposes until a project performance baseline has been validated and the appropriate milestone in accordance with DOE O 413.3B has been approved for these smaller projects. The project is being conducted in accordance with the project management requirements in DOE O 413.3B, Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets, and all appropriate project management requirements have been met. Funds appropriated for this project may be used to provide independent assessments and other direct support determined necessary by the FPD for the planning and execution of this project.

Page 229


5. Financial Schedule

RLUOB Facility (dollars in thousands) App ropriations Obligations Costs

TEC (PED and Construction) a

FY 2004 9,941 0 0FY 2005 39,684 49,625 0FY 2006 54,450 54,450 15,933FY 2007 41,933 41,933 29,364FY 2008 13,122 13,122 50,085 FY 2009 0 0 58,348 FY 2010 0 0 4,393 FY 2011 0 0 1,007

Total, TEC 159,130 159,130 159,130 OPCb

FY 2007 1,153 1,153 0FY 2008 0 0 1,153 FY 2009 3,717 3,717 2,455 FY 2010 0 0 649 FY 2011 0 0 613

Total, OPC 4,870 4,870 4,870 Total Project Cost (TPC)

FY 2004 9,941 0 0FY 2005 39,684 49,625 0FY 2006 54,450 54,450 15,933FY 2007 41,933 41,933 29,364FY 2008 13,122 13,122 51,238 FY 2009 4,870 4,870 60,803 FY 2010 0 0 5,042 FY 2011 0 0 1,620

Total, TPC 164,000 164,000 164,000

a PED funding for RLUOB was provided under 03-D-103-01. b OPCs for CMRR were not segregated by project phase until FY 2009. Aggregate OPCs for earlier years are reported with the NF.

Page 230


RLUOB Equipment Installation (REI) (dollars in thousands) App ropriations Obligations Costs

Total Estimated Cost (TEC) PED 0 0 0

Total, PED (PED 03-D-103-01) 0 0 0

Final Design FY 2007 11,489 11,489 3,109FY 2008 2,009 2,009 9,260FY 2009 0 0 1,129

Total, Final Design (TEC 04-D-125) 13,498 13,498 13,498 Total, Design 13,498 13,498 13,498 Construction

FY 2008 19,604 19,604 0 FY 2009 4,998 4, 998 3, 941 FY 2010 40,000 40,000 36,122FY 2011 59,000 5 9,000 8 2,084 FY 2012 15,800 1 5,800 1 7,255

Total, Construction (TEC 04-D-125) 139,402 139,402 139,402 TEC

FY 2007 11,489 11,489 3,109FY 2008 21,613 21,613 9,260FY 2009 4,998 4, 998 5, 070 FY 2010 40,000 4 0,000 3 6,122FY 2011 59,000 5 9,000 8 2,084 FY 2012 15,800 1 5,800 1 7,255

Total, TEC 152,900 15 2,900 15 2,900 Other Project Cost (OPC) OPC except D&Da

FY 2009 3,079 3,079 5,602 FY 2010 10,700 10,700 8,177FY 2011 14,100 14,100 14,100FY 2012 14,123 14,123 14,123 FY 2013 4,498 4,498 4,498

Total, OPC except D&D 46,500 46,500 46,500 D&D 0 0 0Total, D&D 0 0 0

a OPCs for CMRR were not segregated by project phase until FY 2009. Aggregate OPCs for earlier years are reported with the NF.

Page 231


(dollars in thousands) App ropriations Obligations Costs

OPC FY 2009 3,079 3,079 5,602 FY 2010 10,700 10,700 8,177FY 2011 14,100 14,100 14,100FY 2012 14,123 14,123 14,123 FY 2013 4,498 4,498 4,498

Total, OPC 46,500 46,500 46,500 Total Project Cost (TPC)

FY 2007 11,489 11,489 3,109FY 2008 21,613 21,613 9,260FY 2009 8,077 8,077 10,672 FY 2010 50,700 5 0,700 4 4,299 FY 2011 73,100 7 3,100 9 6,184 FY 2012 29,923 2 9,923 3 1,378FY 2013 4,498 4, 498 4, 498

Total, TPC 199,400 19 9,400 19 9,400

Nuclear Facility Total Estimated Cost (TEC) PED

FY 2004 9,500 0 0FY 2005 13,567 23,067 1,848FY 2006 27,910 27,910 19,147FY 2007 14,161 14,161 27,213FY 2008 0 0 15,079FY 2009 0 0 -329FY 2010 0 0 44FY 2011 0 0 2,136

Total, PED (PED 03-D-103-01) 65,138 65,138 65,138

Final Design 39,406 39,406 1 5,454FY 2008 92,196 92,196 4 5,972 FY 2009 57,000 57,000 6 2,252 FY 2010 166,000 166,000 10 4,500FY 2011 TBD TBD TBD FY 2012 TBD TBD TBD FY 2013 TBD TBD TBDFY 2014 TBD TBD TBDFY 2015 TBD TBD TBD

Total, Final Design (TEC 04-D-125) TBD TBD TBDTotal, Design

Construction

FY 2011 0 0 0FY 2012 TBD TBD TBDFY 2013 TBD TBD TBDFY 2014 TBD TBD TBDFY 2015 TBD TBD TBDFY 2016 TBD TBD TBDFY 2017 TBD TBD TBD

Total, Construction, (TEC 04-D-125) TBD TBD TBD

Page 232



TEC

FY 2004 9,500 0 0FY 2005 13,567 23,067 1 ,848FY 2006 27,910 27,910 1 9,147FY 2007 14,161 14,161 2 7,213FY 2008 39,406 39,406 3 0,533FY 2009 92,196 92,196 4 5,643FY 2010 57,000 57,000 6 2,296 FY 2011 166,000 166,000 10 6,636 FY 2012 TBD TBD TBDFY 2013 TBD TBD TBDFY 2014 TBD TBD TBDFY 2015 TBD TBD TBDFY 2016 TBD TBD TBDFY 2017 TBD TBD TBD

Total TEC TBD TBD TBD Other Project Cost (OPC) OPC except D&D

FY 2002 1,665 1, 665 1, 665 FY 2003 12,174 1 2,174 1 2,174 FY 2004 7,214 7, 214 7, 214 FY 2005 7,164 7, 164 7, 164 FY 2006 1,400 1, 400 1, 064 FY 2007 3,712 3, 712 1, 408 FY 2008 0 0 1,105 FY 2009 1,205 1, 205 1, 018 FY 2010 1,200 1,200 913 FY 2011 2,500 2, 500 2, 594 FY 2012 TBD TBD TBD FY 2013 TBD TBD TBDFY 2014 TBD TBD TBD FY 2015 TBD TBD TBDFY 2016 TBD TBD TBDFY 2017 TBD TBD TBD

Total, OPC except D&D TBD TBD TBD D&D TBD TBD TBDTotal, D&D TBD TBD TBD OPC

FY 2002 1,665 1, 665 1, 665 FY 2003 12,174 1 2,174 1 2,174 FY 2004 7,214 7, 214 7, 214 FY 2005 7,164 7, 164 7, 164 FY 2006 1,400 1,400 1,064FY 2007 3,712 3,712 1,408FY 2008 0 0 1,105FY 2009 1,205 1,205 1,018 FY 2010 1,200 1,200 913

Page 233



FY 2011 2,500 2, 500 2, 594 FY 2012 TBD TBD TBDFY 2013 TBD TBD TBD FY 2014 TBD TBD TBDFY 2015 TBD TBD TBD FY 2016 TBD TBD TBDFY 2017 TBD TBD TBD

Total, OPC TBD TBD TBD Total Project Cost (TPC)

FY 2002 1,665 1, 665 1, 665 FY 2003 12,174 1 2,174 1 2,174 FY 2004 16,714 7, 214 7, 214 FY 2005 20,731 30,231 9,012FY 2006 29,310 29,310 20,211 FY 2007 17,873 17,873 28,621 FY 2008 39,406 39,406 31,638FY 2009 93,401 93,401 46,661FY 2010 58,200 58,200 63,209FY 2011 168,500 168,500 109,230 FY 2012 TBD TBD TBDFY 2013 TBD TBD TBD FY 2014 TBD TBD TBDFY 2015 TBD TBD TBD FY 2016 TBD TBD TBDFY 2017 TBD TBD TBD

Total, TPC TBD TBD TBD Overall Project Total Estimated Cost (TEC) PEDa

FY 2004 9,500 0 0FY 2005 13,567 23,067 1,848FY 2006 27,910 27,910 19,147FY 2007 14,161 14,161 27,213FY 2008 0 0 15,079FY 2009 0 0 -329FY 2010 0 0 44FY 2011 0 0 2,136

Total, PED (PED 03-D-103-01) 65,138 65,138 65,138 Final Design & Construction (TEC 04-D-125)

FY 2004 9,941 0 0FY 2005 39,684 49,625 0FY 2006 54,450 54,450 15,933FY 2007 53,422 53,422 32,473FY 2008 74,141 74,141 74,799

a CMRR RLUOB, SFE and NF have completed preliminary design using PED funds included 03-D-103. Design beyond preliminary will be completed using TEC funds included in 04-D-125.

Page 234



FY 2009 97,194 97,194 109,390FY 2010 97,000 97,000 102,767FY 2011 225,000 225,000 187,591FY 2012 TBD TBD TBDFY 2013 TBD TBD TBDFY 2014 TBD TBD TBDFY 2015 TBD TBD TBDFY 2016 TBD TBD TBDFY 2017 TBD TBD TBD

Total, Final Design & Construction (TEC 04-D-125) TBD TBD TBD TEC

FY 2004 19,441 0 0FY 2005 53,251 72,692 1,848FY 2006 82,360 82,360 35,080FY 2007 67,583 67,583 59,686FY 2008 74,141 74,141 89,878FY 2009 97,194 97,194 109,061FY 2010 97,000 97,000 102,811FY 2011 225,000 225,000 189,727FY 2012 TBD TBD TBDFY 2013 TBD TBD TBDFY 2014 TBD TBD TBDFY 2015 TBD TBD TBDFY 2016 TBD TBD TBDFY 2017 TBD TBD TBD

Total, TECa TBD TBD TBD Other Project Cost (OPC) OPC Except D&D

FY 2002 1,665 1,665 1,665FY 2003 12,174 12,174 12,174FY 2004 7,214 7,214 7,214FY 2005 7,164 7,164 7,164FY 2006 1,400 1,400 1,064FY 2007 4,865 4,865 1,408FY 2008 0 0 2,258FY 2009 8,001 8,001 9,075FY 2010 11,900 11,900 9,739FY 2011 16,600 16,600 17,307FY 2012 TBD TBD TBDFY 2013 TBD TBD TBDFY 2014 TBD TBD TBDFY 2015 TBD TBD TBDFY 2016 TBD TBD TBDFY 2017 TBD TBD TBD

Total, OPC Except D&D TBD TBD TBD

a Section 9 provides preliminary pre-conceptual cost and schedule information for CMR D&D.

Page 235



D&D Total, D&D N/A N/A N/A

OPC

FY 2002 1,665 1,665 1,665FY 2003 12,174 12,174 12,174FY 2004 7,214 7,214 7,214FY 2005 7,164 7,164 7,164FY 2006 1,400 1,400 1,064FY 2007 4,865 4,865 1,408FY 2008 0 0 2,258FY 2009 8,001 8,001 9,075FY 2010 11,900 11,900 9,739FY 2011 16,600 16,600 17,307FY 2012 TBD TBD TBDFY 2013 TBD TBD TBDFY 2014 TBD TBD TBDFY 2015 TBD TBD TBDFY 2016 TBD TBD TBDFY 2017 TBD TBD TBD

Total, OPC Except D&D TBD TBD TBD Total Project Cost (TPC)

FY 2002 1,665 1,665 1,665FY 2003 12,174 12,174 12,174FY 2004 26,655 7,214 7,214FY 2005 60,415 79,856 9,012FY 2006 83,760 83,760 36,144FY 2007 72,448 72,448 61,094FY 2008 74,141 74,141 92,136FY 2009 105,195 105,195 118,136FY 2010 108,900 108,900 112,550FY 2011 241,600 241,600 207,034FY 2012 300,000 300,000 TBDFY 2013 300,000 300,000 TBDFY 2014 350,000 350,000 TBDFY 2015 350,000 350,000 TBDFY 2016 350,000 350,000 TBDFY 2017 TBD TBD TBD

Total, TPC TBD TBD TBD

Page 236


6. Details of Project Cost Estimate


Current Total

Estimate

Previous Total

Estimate

Original Validated Baseline

Total Estimated Cost (TEC)

Design (PED & TEC)

Design TBD 465,276 TBDContingency TBD 80,000 TBD

Total, Design (PED 03-D-103, TEC 04-D-125) TBD 545,276 TBD

Construction Site Preparation TBD 300,000 TBDEquipment TB D 235,000 TBDOther Construction TBD 1,606,823 TBDContingency TB D 702,000 TBD

Total, Construction TBD 2,843,823 TBD

Total, PED & TEC (PED 03-D-103, TEC 04-D-125) TBD 3,389,099 TBDContingency, TEC TBD 782,000 TBD

Other Project Cost (OPC)

OPC except D&D Conceptual Planning TBD 5,000 TBDConceptual Design TBD 26,497 TBDStart-Up TBD 280,404 TBDContingency TBD 94,000 TBD

Total, OPC except D&D TBD 405,901 TBD

D&D D&D N/A N/A N/AContingency N/ A N/A N/A

Total, D&D N/A N/A N/A Total, OPC TBD TBD TBDContingency, OPC TBD TBD TBD

Total, TPC 3,710,000-

5,860,000 TBD TB DTotal, Contingency TBD TBD TBD

Page 237


7. Schedule of Appropriation Requests

Prior Years FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Outyears TotalFY 2005 TEC 159,130 159,130RLOUB OPC 4,068 802 4,870Baseline TPC 163,198 802 0 0 0 0 0 0 164,000FY 2009 TEC 38,100 40,000 59,000 15,800 152,900REI OPC 5,602 11,900 12,100 12,400 4,498 46,500Baseline TPC 43,702 51,900 71,100 28,200 4,498 0 0 0 199,400

TEC 159,130 159,130FY 2010 OPC 4,068 802 4,870RLOUB TPC 163,198 802 0 0 0 0 0 0 164,000

TEC 38,100 40,000 59,000 15,800 152,900FY 2010 OPC 5,602 11,900 12,100 12,400 4,498 46,500REI TPC 43,702 51,900 71,100 28,200 4,498 0 0 0 199,400

TEC 131,600 57,500 129,000 289,200 300,000 300,000 300,000 1,504,631 3,011,931FY 2010 OPC 34,481 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,550 300,500 354,531NF TPC 166,081 59,500 131,500 292,200 303,500 304,000 304,550 1,805,131 3,366,462

TEC 38,100 40,000 59,000 15,800 152,900FY 2011 OPC 5,602 11,900 12,100 12,400 4,498 46,500REI TPC 43,702 51,900 71,100 28,200 4,498 0 0 0 199,400

TEC 131,600 57,500 166,000 289,200 300,000 300,000 300,000 1,532,769 3,077,069FY 2011 OPC 34,481 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,550 300,500 354,531NF TPC 166,081 59,500 168,500 292,200 303,500 304,000 304,550 1,833,269 3,431,600

TEC 38,100 40,000 59,000 15,800 152,900FY 2012 OPC 3,079 10,700 14,100 14,123 4,498 46,500REI TPC 41,179 50,700 73,100 29,923 4,498 0 0 0 199,400

TEC 196,740 57,000 166,000 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBDFY 2012 OPC 34,534 1,200 2,500 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBDNF TPC 231,274 58,200 168,500 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD


Page 238


8. Related Operations and Maintenance Funding Requirements

Start of Operation or Beneficial Occupancy (fiscal quarter or date) 4QFY2009a Expected Useful Life (number of years) 50 Expected Future Start of D&D of this capital asset (fiscal quarter) TBD

(Related Funding requirements)

(dollars in thousands) Annual Costs Life Cycle Costs

Current Total

Estimate

Previous Total

Estimate

Current Total

Estimate

Previous Total

EstimateOperations TBD TBD TBD TBDMaintenance TBD TBD TBD TBDTotal, Operations & Maintenance 125,000 N/A 6,300,000 N/A

9. Required D&D Information

As directed by the DOE Acquisition Executive at CMRR CD-0, NNSA and LANL developed a pre-conceptual cost and schedule range for the D&D requirements of the existing CMR Building located at TA-3 during the CMRR conceptual design. The initial pre-conceptual cost estimate range for D&D of the CMR Building is approximately $200,000 - $350,000 (un-escalated FY 2004 dollars) with an associated schedule estimate range of 4-5 years. This information was presented as part of CMRR CD-1 per Secretarial direction issued at CD-0. During the 3rd Quarter of FY 2005, the D&D of the existing CMR facility received CD-0 as a separate project in conjunction with CMRR CD-1 approval. Current Future Years Nuclear Security Program/Integrated Construction Program Plan (FYNSP/ICPP) funding profiles do not include the funding for the D&D of the CMR Facility. The NNSA will not initiate CMR D&D activities until completion and operational start-up of the CMRR Nuclear Facility, currently projected to be operational well after the FYNSP budget planning window. As such, budget formulation for the CMR D&D project is premature for the FY 2012 budget submission and will not be included in future CMRR Project Data Sheets. The D&D CMR Facility budget will occur upon the establishment of a project number and update of the FYNSP/ICPP in outyear budget cycles. The CMR D&D commitment is reflected in this CPDS for completeness. However, as planning for this D&D activity matures, NNSA may elect to enable this effort as a separate project, execute it as an element of a wider project or program for a portfolio of D&D activities at LANL, or bundle it with other, yet undefined activities.

a This date corresponds to the beneficial occupancy of the RLUOB construction phase only. NF date and related funding requirements are TBD.

Page 239


Area Gross Square Feet (gsf) TA-55-400 (Radiological Laboratory & Office Building) TA-55-440 (Central Utility Building)

187,127 20,998

TA-55-500 (Security Category I/Hazard Category II Nuclear Facility) 395,230 (beneficial occupancy post FY 2018)

TA-3, Building 29 (CMR) (571,458) LANL “banked excess” necessary to offset one-for-one requirement 31,897 Name and site location of existing facility to be replaced: CMR (TA-3, Building 29) When originally conceptualized, the replacement facilities for CMR, the RLUOB and NF, were thought to result in a significantly smaller space than the CMR facilities being replaced. However, owing to needs to meet modern health, waste, safety, and security functions, the combined space for CMRR is now expected to exceed the space for CMR. The CMRR has incorporated the NNSA Fiscal Year Banking of Excess Facilities Elimination, New Construction and Net Banked Square Footage reporting process that documents, through the DOE Facilities Information Management System (FIMS), the data associated with new construction added by the RLUOB and the NF. The new construction square footage is accounted for once beneficial occupancy is received and is subsequently offset with LANL “banked excess” additional D&D space to meet the “one-for-one” requirement within the FY 2002 Energy and Water and Water Development Appropriations Bill conference report (107-258). Given planned new construction (including CMRR) at LANL and planned excess facility reductions, the excess program is projecting it will have banked well over a million and a half square feet before CMR is demolished. The gross square feet of the CMRR NF is a preliminary estimate and will be updated as the design develops.

10. Acquisition Approach Design and Construction Management will be implemented by Los Alamos National Security through the LANL Management and Operating Contract. The CMRR Acquisition Strategy is based on procurement strategies specific for each major component of the CMRR project in order to mitigate overall technical and schedule risk. The RLUOB was implemented via LANL-issued design-build subcontract based on performance specifications developed during CMRR Conceptual Design. The SFE associated with the RLUOB and the NF will be implemented via one or more LANL-issued final design-bid-construction contracts. Design-build contracting may also be employed for discrete, well defined, procurements. Other contracting mechanisms may also be utilized that are best suited, after analysis for individual and discrete procurements. The performance baseline will be established upon completion of final design for each portion of the Project. Options are being considered for construction of the main NF structure, but the current plan is to acquire one or more qualified specialty contractors through the site M&O under commercial terms.

Page 240

04-d-125, chemistry and metallurgy research building replacement (cmrr)...

Documents