03/05/2015 - page 1 of íîó community consolidated school ......presentation content notes • the...

Community Consolidated School District 181 BOARD REPORT

CONTACT: Don White, Ph.D., Superintendent TITLE: Winter MAP Assessment DATE: March 9, 2015 Background: The District administers three annual cycles of the NWEA MAP assessment. The winter cycle is complete, and the scores have been analyzed. Discussion: A comprehensive analysis of the winter 2015 NWEA MAP assessment results is posted to BoardDocs. In addition to the presentation that will be given at the meeting, documents with information specific to each school are also posted to BoardDocs. The analysis presented at the meeting includes the following information. However, not all slides in the presentation will be discussed at the meeting.

• Presentation Content Notes • NWEA Growth Terms, Explanations & Definitions • Winter Percentile Rank Tables (from NWEA Norms) • Count of Students Tested • Winter Test Cycle RIT & Percentile Comparison: District & School Levels • Projected vs. Actual Mean Growth for Grade Levels & Cohorts: • NWEA Student Growth Summary Reports • Projected Growth Summary: Grade & Cohort Comparisons • Projected Growth Cohort Achievement History (Since Fall 2008) • Presentation Notes & General Conclusions • Next Steps

Files for each of the schools to use in their school improvement planning are posted to BoardDocs. Not all of the slides that were posted to BoardDocs will be discussed during the 3/9/15 presentation.

Financial Impact: None Recommendation: For discussion only.

2015_03_09_Winter_MAP_Presentation_to_BOE 03/05/2015 - of 127

Winter MAP Report March 9, 2015


Presentation Contents

•  Presentation Content Notes

•  NWEA Growth Terms, Explanations & Definitions

•  Winter Percentile Rank Tables (from NWEA Norms)

•  Count of Students Tested

•  Winter Test Cycle RIT & Percentile Comparison: District & School Levels

•  Projected vs. Actual Mean Growth for Grade Levels & Cohorts:

•  NWEA Student Growth Summary Reports

•  Projected Growth Summary: Grade & Cohort Comparisons

•  Projected Growth Cohort Achievement History (Since Fall 2008)

•  Presentation Notes & General Conclusions

•  Next StepsFiles for each of the schools to use in their school improvement planning are posted to BoardDocs. Not all of the slides that were posted to BoardDocs will be discussed during the 3/9/15 presenta@on.

2�


Presentation Content Notes•  The presentation includes both RIT and Projected Growth

comparisons

–  Grade level to grade level comparisons (e.g., 3rd to 3rd, 4th to 4th, etc.)

–  Cohort comparisons – groups moving through grade levels (e.g., 3rd to 4th to 5th, etc.)

• Growth Index

–  Desired Growth Index = 0 or above

–  A negative growth index does not necessarily mean that something went wrong or the programming is flawed.

–  A pattern of multiple growth indexes does signal that something is not working as planned.

3�


NWEA Growth Terms, Explanations, & Definitions•  The growth projection represents our best estimate of the average growth

for students at various points on the RIT scale.

•  The percentage of students who showed growth consistent with what we might expect to see from them based on their grade, starting achievement level, and the subject tested.

•  It’s important to restate that the growth projections are just that – projections (which are great for use in setting student goals) – and not definitive targets for where students should be by the end of the year.Source:� h,ps://www.nwea.org/blog/2013/using-‐percentage-‐students-‐mee>ng-‐exceeding-‐growth-‐projec>ons-‐evalura>on-‐tool/ �

When sharing this data with parents, it is most accurate to say,�

“The average growth for a student in the same grade as your

child, who started with the same score was X points.”�

Jami� Breslin, Midwest Regional Account Manager Northwest Evalua>on Associa>on (NWEA)�2/12/15 email 4�


NWEA Growth Terms, Explanations, & Definitions (continued)• Growth Index

–  The growth index indicates the RIT value by which the student exceeded the projected RIT (plus values), fell short of the projected RIT (minus values), or exactly met the projected RIT (0). The projected RIT is determined by RIT Point Growth Norms.

•  RIT Point Growth Norms–  Tables that give educators a more realistic look at growth across various

starting RIT scores at each grade level. These norms establish typical student growth, relative to other students in the NWEA norming study who started with the same RIT score in the same grade.

•  Projected RIT–  The projected RIT is calculated by adding the growth projection to the

starting RIT. It reflects the score that the student is attempting to achieve in the next testing session. As it appears on MAP reports, it represents the RIT point growth norm for the student.

5�


NWEA Growth Terms, Explanations, & Definitions (continued)•  Typical vs. Expected Growth

–  When talking about projected growth, it is referred to as typical growth. Use of the term “expected growth” should be avoided, as we cannot expect every student to achieve at the same rate. Rather, based on NWEA normed data, we can determine what is typical for students at various grade and instructional levels.

–  Often expectations are that a student should achieve growth that equals the average. In other words, we expect students to perform the same as average students. This expectation may be unreasonable and undesirable.

–  For example, a below-average student needs to grow more than average to attain an achievement level required for college. And high-achieving students may set goals beyond the average growth to stay challenged.

–  For these reasons, “typical” is a more accurate word to describe the average growth of students.

6�


NWEA Growth Terms, Explanations, & Definitions (continued)•  Percent Meeting Growth Projection

–  The total student growth divided by the total of projected RITs, expressed as a percentage. It shows the proportion of the overall RIT growth projections achieved by the students. Performance of 100% is considered average, meaning the student growth equaled the projections. This is used in conjunction with the Percentage of Students Who Met or Exceeded Their Projected RIT.

7�


Winter Percentile Rank Tables (from NWEA Norms)Winter� Reading RIT Score to Percen>le Rank Conversion

(at about 18 instruc>onal weeks) %ile G 3 G 4 G 5 G 6 G 7 G 8 G 9 G 10 G 11 1 163� 172� 179� 183� 187� 189� 188� 189� 190�25 185� 193� 200� 204� 208� 211� 211� 213� 213�50 195� 203� 210� 214� 218� 221� 222� 223� 223�75 204� 212� 219� 224� 227� 231� 232� 234� 235�99 231� 239� 245� 251� 254� 258� 261� 263� 265�

Winter�Math RIT Score to Percen>le Rank Conversion (at about 18 instruc>onal weeks)

%ile G 3 G 4 G 5 G 6 G 7 G 8 G 9 G 10 G 11 1 171� 179� 186� 188� 191� 195� 195� 194� 196�25 190� 199� 208� 212� 216� 221� 223� 223� 224�50 198� 209� 218� 223� 228� 233� 235� 235� 236�75 207� 217� 227� 233� 239� 244� 247� 248� 250�99 230� 243� 254� 262� 272� 277� 281� 283� 284�

Percen@le Rank This number indicates the percentage of students in the NWEA norm group for this grade that this student’s score equaled or exceeded. The percen>le rank is a norma>ve sta>s>c indica>ng how well a student performed compared to the students in the norm group. A student’s percen>le rank indicates that the student scored as well as, or be=er than, the percent of students in the norm group. In other words, a student with a percen>le rank of 72 scored as well as or be,er than 72 percent of the students in the norm group. (Source: MAP Glossary of Terms)


Count of Students Tested

9�

Range Gr District Elm Madison Monroe Oak Prospect The Lane Walker CHMS HMS

Mathe

ma@

cs

Fall 2012 to Winter 2013

2� 1� 1�3� 419� 36� 78� 80� 44� 81� 57� 43�4� 436� 46� 65� 70� 50� 77� 64� 64�5� 465� 52� 89� 78� 48� 72� 77� 49�6� 461� 206� 255�7� 511� 236� 275�8� 28� 17� 11�


2� 375� 46� 55� 70� 45� 59� 53� 47�3� 422� 60� 60� 62� 46� 64� 68� 62�4� 443� 47� 78� 83� 44� 85� 64� 42�5� 440� 52� 63� 70� 51� 77� 63� 64�6� 226� 209� 17�7� 390� 205� 185�8� 245� 3� 242�


2� 390� 56� 65� 67� 36� 70� 65� 31�3� 380� 51� 55� 75� 40� 55� 56� 48�4� 425� 64� 64� 62� 43� 67� 68� 57�5� 453� 51� 82� 81� 44� 84� 69� 42�6� 447� 214� 233�7� 487� 208� 279�8� 468� 198� 270�


Count of Students Tested

10�

Range Gr District Elm Madison Monroe Oak Prospect The Lane Walker CHMS HMS

Read

ing


3� 418� 36� 78� 80� 44� 81� 56� 43�4� 437� 46� 66� 70� 51� 77� 64� 63�5� 464� 52� 89� 78� 47� 72� 77� 49�6� 461� 206� 255�7� 510� 236� 274�8� 45� 21� 24�


3� 420� 59� 60� 62� 46� 64� 67� 62�4� 440� 46� 78� 83� 43� 85� 63� 42�5� 440� 52� 63� 70� 51� 77� 63� 64�6� 220� 209� 11�7� 429� 205� 224�8� 500� 242� 258�


3� 381� 51� 55� 75� 40� 55� 57� 48�4� 424� 64� 64� 62� 43� 66� 68� 57�5� 451� 51� 82� 81� 42� 84� 69� 42�6� 445� 214� 231�7� 488� 208� 280�8� 468� 199� 269�


Winter Test Cycle RIT & Percentile Comparison (No Change; Increase; Decrease)

RIT Scores Percen@le

7 measures stayed the same; 5 increased; 1 decreased

Grade Winter

2012-‐2013 Winter

2013-‐2014 Winter

2014-‐2015

Mathe

ma@

cs 3� 209� 211� 212

4� 221� 224� 224 5� 230� 230� 229 6� 235� 234� 236 7� 241� 240� 242 8� 219� 244� 246

Read

ing

3� 207� 206� 206 4� 216� 215� 215 5� 223� 222� 222 6� 225� 224� 226 7� 230� 230� 230 8� 218� 233� 233

Winter 2012-‐2013

Winter 2013-‐2014

Winter 2014-‐2015

76� 74� 74�72� 70� 70�66� 63� 63�57� 55� 60�56� 56� 56�20� 52� 52�85� 87� 89�90� 72� 75�92� 92� 91�93� 92� 93�94� 94� 95�46� 94� 95�


Winter Test Cycle RIT & Percentile Comparison (District & School Levels)

Percen@le Winter

2013-‐2014 Winter

2014-‐2015 Reading Elm Elementary School 196� 198�

Madison Elementary School 197� 196�Monroe Elementary School 196� 195�Oak Elementary School 198� 195�Prospect Elementary School 191� 197�The Lane Elementary School 196� 194�Walker Elementary School 196� 191�

Winter 2013-‐2014

Winter 2014-‐2015

79� 84�83� 81�81� 79�84� 79�71� 83�81� 77�81� 71�

RIT Scores

Winter 2013-‐2014

Winter 2014-‐2015

Math Elm Elementary School 195� 202�Madison Elementary School 196� 197�Monroe Elementary School 198� 198�Oak Elementary School 197� 197�Prospect Elementary School 197� 199�The Lane Elementary School 196� 197�Walker Elementary School 198� 191�

Winter 2013-‐2014

Winter 2014-‐2015

79� 91�81� 83�85� 85�83� 83�83� 87�81� 83�85� 69�

Grade 2


Winter Test Cycle RIT & Percentile Comparison (District & School Levels continued)

Percen@le RIT Scores Grade 3 Winter 2012-‐20

13

Winter 2013-‐2014

Winter 2014-‐20

15 Reading Elm Elementary School 208� 205� 206�

Madison Elementary School 208� 210� 209�Monroe Elementary School 207� 205� 206�Oak Elementary School 213� 210� 208�Prospect Elementary School 205� 205� 201�The Lane Elementary School 207� 207� 205�Walker Elementary School 205� 205� 205�

Winter 2012-‐2013

Winter 2013-‐2014

Winter 2014-‐2015

83� 77� 79�83� 86� 85�81� 77� 79�90� 86� 83�77� 77� 69�81� 81� 77�77� 77� 77�

Winter 2012-‐2013

Winter 2013-‐2014

Winter 2014-‐2015

79� 85� 85�79� 85� 83�83� 88� 88�91� 91� 85�81� 81� 85�79� 89� 88�79� 81� 83�

Winter 2012-‐20

13

Winter 2013-‐2014

Winter 2014-‐20

15 Math Elm Elementary School 208� 211� 211�




Percen@le RIT Scores Grade 4 Winter 2012-‐20

13

Winter 2013-‐2014

Winter 2014-‐20



Winter 2012-‐2013

Winter 2013-‐2014

Winter 2014-‐2015

77� 75� 75�81� 86� 84�79� 79� 77�83� 79� 84�84� 86� 84�84� 77� 81�84� 79� 81�

Winter 2012-‐2013

Winter 2013-‐2014

Winter 2014-‐2015

81� 85� 85�85� 88� 86�81� 86� 91�85� 90� 91�86� 91� 85�79� 85� 88�85� 86� 86�

Winter 2012-‐20

13

Winter 2013-‐2014

Winter 2014-‐20





Percen@le RIT Scores Grade 5

Winter 2012-‐20

13

Winter 2013-‐20

14

Winter 2014-‐20



Winter 2012-‐2013

Winter 2013-‐2014

Winter 2014-‐2015

81� 83� 71�75� 84� 79�79� 83� 81�86� 83� 83�83� 83� 81�81� 79� 77�86� 79� 81�

Winter 2012-‐2013

Winter 2013-‐2014

Winter 2014-‐2015

82� 80� 78�83� 85� 85�83� 80� 82�88� 80� 83�82� 83� 85�83� 82� 82�85� 83� 80�

Winter 2012-‐20

13

Winter 2013-‐2014

Winter 2014-‐20





Percen@le RIT Scores Grade 6 Winter

2012-‐2013 Winter

2013-‐2014 Winter

2014-‐2015 Reading Clarendon Hills Middle 227� 225� 227�

Hinsdale Middle 224� 206� 225�

Winter 2012-‐2013

Winter 2013-‐2014

Winter 2014-‐2015

82� 78� 82�76� 30� 78�

Winter 2012-‐2013

Winter 2013-‐2014

Winter 2014-‐2015

81� 79� 81�77� 30� 83�

Winter 2012-‐2013

Winter 2013-‐2014

Winter 2014-‐2015

Math Clarendon Hills Middle 236� 235� 236�Hinsdale Middle 234� 214� 237�




Winter 2012-‐2013

Winter 2013-‐2014

Winter 2014-‐2015


Winter 2012-‐2013

Winter 2013-‐2014

Winter 2014-‐2015

78� 78� 80�78� 73� 78�

Winter 2012-‐2013

Winter 2013-‐2014

Winter 2014-‐2015

83� 84� 81�79� 79� 81�

Winter 2012-‐2013

Winter 2013-‐2014

Winter 2014-‐2015

Reading Clarendon Hills Middle 231� 232� 230�Hinsdale Middle 229� 229� 230�




Winter 2012-‐2013

Winter 2013-‐2014

Winter 2014-‐2015


Winter 2012-‐2013

Winter 2013-‐2014

Winter 2014-‐2015

27� 27� 82�15� 75� 77�

Winter 2012-‐2013

Winter 2013-‐2014

Winter 2014-‐2015

Reading Clarendon Hills Middle 220� 232� 235�Hinsdale Middle 215� 233� 231�

Winter 2012-‐2013

Winter 2013-‐2014

Winter 2014-‐2015

48� 78� 83�35� 80� 76�


2� 3� 4� 5� 6� 7� 8�Average of First Term Mean RIT 189� 204� 218� 225� 233� 239� 245�

Average of 2nd Term Mean RIT 198� 212� 224� 229� 236� 242� 247�

Average of Projected Growth Mean 7� 6� 5� 5� 3� 3� 3�

Average of Actual Mean Growth 8� 8� 7� 4� 3� 3� 2�

-‐10 0�

10�20�30�40�50�60�70�80�90�100�110�120�130�140�150�160�170�180�190�200�210�220�230�240�250�260�

Projected vs. Actual Mean Growth -‐ Math Fall 2014 to Winter 2015

MAP_Student_Growth_Summary_Report_District.xlsx -‐ Proj vs Actual F-‐W Cohort 19


2� 3� 4� 5� 6� 7� 8�Average of First Term Mean RIT 186� 201� 211� 218� 223� 228� 232�

Average of 2nd Term Mean RIT 196� 206� 215� 223� 226� 230� 233�

Average of Projected Growth Mean 7� 4� 3� 2� 2� 2� 2�

Average of Actual Mean Growth 9� 5� 5� 4� 3� 2� 1�

-‐10 0�

10�20�30�40�50�60�70�80�90�100�110�120�130�140�150�160�170�180�190�200�210�220�230�240�250�260�

Projected vs. Actual Mean Growth -‐ Reading Fall 2014 to Winter 2015�



6� 7� 8� 6� 7� 8�Elementary Gradua>on 2015 Elementary Gradua>on 2015

Mathemacs�� Reading�Average of First Term Mean RIT 233� 237� 245� 223� 228� 232�

Average of 2nd Term Mean RIT 235� 240� 247� 226� 230� 233�

Average of Projected Growth Mean 3� 3� 3� 2� 2� 2�

Average of Actual Mean Growth 2� 2� 2� 3� 2� 1�

-‐10 0�

10�20�30�40�50�60�70�80�90�100�110�120�130�140�150�160�170�180�190�200�210�220�230�240�250�260�

Projected vs. Actual Mean Growth -‐ Fall to Winter Reading & Math








-‐10 0�

10�20�30�40�50�60�70�80�90�100�110�120�130�140�150�160�170�180�190�200�210�220�230�240�250�260�

Projected vs. Actual Mean Growth -‐ Fall to Winter Reading & Math�








-‐10 0�

10�20�30�40�50�60�70�80�90�100�110�120�130�140�150�160�170�180�190�200�210�220�230�240�250�260�




3� 4� 3� 4�Elementary Gradua>on 2019 Elementary Gradua>on 2019

Mathemacs�� Reading�Average of First Term Mean RIT 203� 218� 202� 211�

Average of 2nd Term Mean RIT 212� 224� 207� 215�

Average of Projected Growth Mean 6� 5� 4� 3�

Average of Actual Mean Growth 8� 7� 5� 5�

-‐10 0�

10�20�30�40�50�60�70�80�90�100�110�120�130�140�150�160�170�180�190�200�210�220�230�240�250�260�




2� 3� 2� 3�Elementary Gradua>on 2020 Elementary Gradua>on 2020

Mathemacs�� Reading�Average of First Term Mean RIT 190� 204� 189� 201�

Average of 2nd Term Mean RIT 197� 212� 196� 206�

Average of Projected Growth Mean 7� 6� 7� 4�

Average of Actual Mean Growth 7� 8� 7� 5�

-‐10 0�

10�20�30�40�50�60�70�80�90�100�110�120�130�140�150�160�170�180�190�200�210�220�230�240�250�260�




2� 2�Elementary Gradua>on 2021 Elementary Gradua>on 2021

Mathemacs�� Reading�Average of First Term Mean RIT 189� 186�

Average of 2nd Term Mean RIT 198� 196�

Average of Projected Growth Mean 7� 7�

Average of Actual Mean Growth 8� 9�

-‐10 0�

10�20�30�40�50�60�70�80�90�100�110�120�130�140�150�160�170�180�190�200�210�220�230�240�250�260�




Student Growth Summary Report Aggregate by District Term:

District: Grouping: Small Group Display: Growth measured from

Winter 2012-2013 Community Consolidated School District 181 None No Fall 2012 to Winter 2013

Mathematics

Generated 2/18/15, 7:46:50 AM Page 28 of 3

Fall 2012 Winter 2013 Actual Growth Projected Growth Grade (Winter 2013) Count Mea

n RIT

Std Dev

Mean Std RIT Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error

Count with Projection

Mean Projection

Growth Index

Percent of Projection

Count Meeting Projection

Percent Meeting Projection

2 1 3 419 204.5 10.8 209.3 10.2 4.9 6.1 0.3 419 6.0 -1.2 81.7 198 47.3 4 436 217.1 13.9 221.5 13.4 4.4 6.0 0.3 436 5.0 -0.6 88.0 209 47.9 5 465 226.0 12.8 230.2 12.8 4.2 5.8 0.3 465 5.0 -0.8 84.0 209 44.9 6 461 232.7 13.5 235.2 13.7 2.4 6.1 0.3 460 3.0 -0.6 80.0 233 50.7 7 511 238.8 14.2 240.7 14 1.9 5.3 0.2 511 3.0 -1.1 63.3 217 42.5 8 28 218.3 11.9 218.3 12.8 -0.1 10.5 2.0 28 3.0 -3.1 -3.3 12 42.9





Reading



n RIT

Std Dev

Mean RIT

Std Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




2 1 3 418 202.7 11.4 207.5 10.7 4.8 7.6 0.4 418 4.1 0.7 117.1 224 53.6 4 437 212.1 12.0 216.0 11.2 3.9 6.7 0.3 437 3.1 0.9 125.8 260 59.5 5 464 220.0 10.7 223.3 10.4 3.4 6.6 0.3 464 2.4 1.0 141.7 280 60.3 6 461 223.2 10.8 225.6 10.9 2.5 5.9 0.3 461 2.0 0.5 125.0 260 56.4 7 510 228.0 10.9 230.1 11.2 2.1 7.0 0.3 510 2.0 0.1 105.0 272 53.3 8 45 216.9 11.4 217.1 11.4 0.2 10.2 1.5 45 2.1 -1.9 9.5 16 35.6





Mathematics

Generated 2/14/15, 1:31:23 PM Page 30 of 2


n RIT

Std Dev

Mean Std RIT Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




1 6 2 375 189.8 11.9 197.2 10.7 7.4 6.6 0.3 375 6.6 0.8 112.1 211 56.3 3 422 203.4 13.1 211.6 14 8.2 6.5 0.3 422 6.0 2.2 136.7 284 67.3 4 443 217.6 13.0 224.0 12.5 6.3 6.7 0.3 443 5.0 1.3 126.0 256 57.8 5 440 226.2 13.4 230.6 13.5 4.4 5.7 0.3 440 5.0 -0.6 88.0 227 51.6 6 226 230.7 15.4 233.5 15.7 2.8 5.7 0.4 226 3.0 -0.2 93.3 107 47.3 7 390 237.4 15.7 239.6 15.4 2.2 5.2 0.3 389 3.0 -0.8 73.3 186 47.8 8 245 242.8 15.3 244.0 15.7 1.2 5.7 0.4 245 2.8 -1.6 42.9 95 38.8





Reading



n RIT

Std Dev

Mean Std RIT Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




2 375 189.1 14.4 196.1 12.8 6.9 8.6 0.4 375 6.8 0.1 101.5 190 50.7 3 420 201.7 12.7 206.9 11.7 5.1 7.1 0.3 420 4.1 1.0 124.4 246 58.6 4 440 210.8 11.5 215.3 10.9 4.5 6.5 0.3 440 3.1 1.4 145.2 271 61.6 5 440 218.7 12.0 222.2 11.9 3.5 6.5 0.3 440 2.4 1.1 145.8 265 60.2 6 220 222.0 13.2 224.6 13 2.7 5.9 0.4 220 2.0 0.6 135.0 124 56.4 7 429 227.9 12.5 230.2 12 2.4 6.2 0.3 429 2.0 0.3 120.0 227 52.9 8 500 231.9 11.5 232.9 11.5 1.0 6.0 0.3 500 2.0 -1.0 50.0 213 42.6





Mathematics



n RIT

Std Dev

Mean Std RIT Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




1 2 2 390 189.2 12.3 197.6 10.7 8.4 6.6 0.3 390 6.7 1.8 125.4 249 63.8 3 380 203.5 12.3 211.6 13.1 8.1 6.4 0.3 380 6.0 2.0 135.0 249 65.5 4 425 217.6 13.9 224.2 13.7 6.6 6.9 0.3 425 5.0 1.5 132.0 252 59.3 5 453 225.4 12.0 229.2 11.7 3.8 5.8 0.3 453 5.0 -1.2 76.0 201 44.4 6 447 233.3 14.9 236.3 15.1 3.1 5.8 0.3 446 3.0 0.1 103.3 253 56.7 7 487 238.7 15.0 241.8 15.2 3.1 5.8 0.3 482 3.0 0.1 103.3 267 55.4 8 468 244.9 15.7 246.6 16 1.8 6.0 0.3 463 2.8 -1.0 64.3 215 46.4





Reading



n RIT

Std Dev

Mean RIT

Std Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




1 1 2 387 186.4 15.9 195.8 13.5 9.4 8.8 0.4 387 7.0 2.4 134.3 244 63.0 3 381 200.8 13.1 206.1 13.2 5.3 7.5 0.4 381 4.2 1.1 126.2 222 58.3 4 424 210.7 12.8 215.4 12.4 4.7 7.3 0.4 424 3.1 1.7 151.6 265 62.5 5 451 218.4 11.8 222.6 10.9 4.2 6.7 0.3 451 2.4 1.8 175.0 280 62.1 6 445 222.9 12.2 225.8 12.3 2.8 6.9 0.3 445 2.0 0.8 140.0 253 56.9 7 488 228.1 11.4 230.2 11.4 2.2 6.4 0.3 488 2.0 0.2 110.0 255 52.3 8 468 231.9 11.5 232.9 12.7 1.0 7.0 0.3 468 2.0 -1.0 50.0 211 45.1


Fall 2012 to Winter 2013� Fall 2013 to Winter 2014� Fall 2014 to Winter 2015�2�

Average of Percent Mee>ng Projec>on� 56.3� 63.8�Average of Projected Growth Mean� 6.6� 6.7�Average of Actual Mean Growth� 7.4� 8.4�Average of Projected Growth Index� 0.8� 1.8�

5.0�

0.0�

100.0�

95.0�

90.0�

85.0�

80.0�

75.0�

70.0�

65.0�

60.0�

55.0�

50.0�

45.0�

40.0�

35.0�

30.0�

25.0�

20.0�

15.0�

10.0�

CCSD 181 MAP Projected Growth Summary -‐ Mathematics Grade 2�

MAP_Student_Growth_Summary_Report_District.xlsx -‐ F-‐W Math Gr 2 Chart 2/26/2015 -‐ Page 41 of 113



Average of Percent Mee>ng Projec>on� 47.3� 67.3� 65.5�Average of Projected Growth Mean� 6.0� 6.0� 6.0�Average of Actual Mean Growth� 4.9� 8.2� 8.1�Average of Projected Growth Index� (1.2)� 2.2� 2.0�

95.0�

90.0�

85.0�

80.0�

75.0�

70.0�

65.0�

60.0�

55.0�

50.0�

45.0�

40.0�

35.0�

30.0�

25.0�

20.0�

15.0�

10.0�

5.0�

0.0�

(5.0)�

(10.0)�

100.0�





Average of Percent Mee>ng Projec>on� 47.9� 57.8� 59.3�Average of Projected Growth Mean� 5.0� 5.0� 5.0�Average of Actual Mean Growth� 4.4� 6.3� 6.6�Average of Projected Growth Index� (0.6)� 1.3� 1.5�

95.0�

90.0�

85.0�

80.0�

75.0�

70.0�

65.0�

60.0�

55.0�

50.0�

45.0�

40.0�

35.0�

30.0�

25.0�

20.0�

15.0�

10.0�

5.0�

0.0�

(5.0)�

(10.0)�

100.0�





Average of Percent Mee>ng Projec>on� 44.9� 51.6� 44.4�Average of Projected Growth Mean� 5.0� 5.0� 5.0�Average of Actual Mean Growth� 4.2� 4.4� 3.8�Average of Projected Growth Index� (0.8)� (0.6)� (1.2)�

95.0�

90.0�

85.0�

80.0�

75.0�

70.0�

65.0�

60.0�

55.0�

50.0�

45.0�

40.0�

35.0�

30.0�

25.0�

20.0�

15.0�

10.0�

5.0�

0.0�

(5.0)�

(10.0)�

100.0�





Average of Percent Mee>ng Projec>on� 50.7� 47.3� 56.7�Average of Projected Growth Mean� 3.0� 3.0� 3.0�Average of Actual Mean Growth� 2.4� 2.8� 3.1�Average of Projected Growth Index� (0.6)� (0.2)� 0.1�

95.0�

90.0�

85.0�

80.0�

75.0�

70.0�

65.0�

60.0�

55.0�

50.0�

45.0�

40.0�

35.0�

30.0�

25.0�

20.0�

15.0�

10.0�

5.0�

0.0�

(5.0)�

(10.0)�

100.0�





Average of Percent Mee>ng Projec>on� 42.5� 47.8� 55.4�Average of Projected Growth Mean� 3.0� 3.0� 3.0�Average of Actual Mean Growth� 1.9� 2.2� 3.1�Average of Projected Growth Index� (1.1)� (0.8)� 0.1�

95.0�

90.0�

85.0�

80.0�

75.0�

70.0�

65.0�

60.0�

55.0�

50.0�

45.0�

40.0�

35.0�

30.0�

25.0�

20.0�

15.0�

10.0�

5.0�

0.0�

(5.0)�

(10.0)�

100.0�





Average of Percent Mee>ng Projec>on� 42.9� 38.8� 46.4�Average of Projected Growth Mean� 3.0� 2.8� 2.8�Average of Actual Mean Growth� (0.1)� 1.2� 1.8�Average of Projected Growth Index� (3.1)� (1.6)� (1.0)�

95.0�

90.0�

85.0�

80.0�

75.0�

70.0�

65.0�

60.0�

55.0�

50.0�

45.0�

40.0�

35.0�

30.0�

25.0�

20.0�

15.0�

10.0�

5.0�

0.0�

(5.0)�

(10.0)�

100.0�





Average of Percent Mee>ng Projec>on� 50.7� 63.0�Average of Projected Growth Mean� 6.8� 7.0�Average of Actual Mean Growth� 6.9� 9.4�Average of Projected Growth Index� 0.1� 2.4�

5.0�

0.0�

100.0�

95.0�

90.0�

85.0�

80.0�

75.0�

70.0�

65.0�

60.0�

55.0�

50.0�

45.0�

40.0�

35.0�

30.0�

25.0�

20.0�

15.0�

10.0�

CCSD 181 MAP Projected Growth Summary -‐ Reading Grade 2�

MAP_Student_Growth_Summary_Report_District.xlsx -‐ F-‐W Reading Gr 2 Chart 2/26/2015 -‐ Page 48 of 113



Average of Percent Mee>ng Projec>on� 53.6� 58.6� 58.3�Average of Projected Growth Mean� 4.1� 4.1� 4.2�Average of Actual Mean Growth� 4.8� 5.1� 5.3�Average of Projected Growth Index� 0.7� 1.0� 1.1�

95.0�

90.0�

85.0�

80.0�

75.0�

70.0�

65.0�

60.0�

55.0�

50.0�

45.0�

40.0�

35.0�

30.0�

25.0�

20.0�

15.0�

10.0�

5.0�

0.0�

(5.0)�

(10.0)�

100.0�






95.0�

90.0�

85.0�

80.0�

75.0�

70.0�

65.0�

60.0�

55.0�

50.0�

45.0�

40.0�

35.0�

30.0�

25.0�

20.0�

15.0�

10.0�

5.0�

0.0�

(5.0)�

(10.0)�

100.0�





Average of Percent Mee>ng Projec>on� 35.6� 42.6� 45.1�Average of Projected Growth Mean� 2.1� 2.0� 2.0�Average of Actual Mean Growth� 0.2� 1.0� 1.0�Average of Projected Growth Index� (1.9)� (1.0)� (1.0)�

95.0�

90.0�

85.0�

80.0�

75.0�

70.0�

65.0�

60.0�

55.0�

50.0�

45.0�

40.0�

35.0�

30.0�

25.0�

20.0�

15.0�

10.0�

5.0�

0.0�

(5.0)�

(10.0)�

100.0�




100.0�

95.0�

90.0�

85.0�

80.0�

75.0�

70.0�

65.0�

60.0�

55.0�

50.0�

45.0�

40.0�

35.0�

30.0�

25.0�

20.0�

15.0�

10.0�

5.0�

0.0�

(5.0)�

(10.0)�

CCSD 181 MAP Projected Growth Summary -‐ Mathematics Cohort 2013�

MAP_Student_Growth_Summary_Report_District.xlsx -‐ F-‐W Math Cohort Chart 2013 2/26/2015 -‐ Page 96 of 113

Fall� 2012� to� Winter� 2013�8�

Elementary� Gradua>on 2013�Average� of� Percent� Meeting� Projec>on� 42.9�

Average� of� Projected�� owth�� ean� 3.0�

Average� of� Actual� Mean� Growth� (0.1)�

Average� of� Projected�� owth� Index� (3.1)�


100.0�

95.0�

90.0�

85.0�

80.0�

75.0�

70.0�

65.0�

60.0�

55.0�

50.0�

45.0�

40.0�

35.0�

30.0�

25.0�

20.0�

15.0�

10.0�

5.0�

0.0�

(5.0)�

(10.0)�



Fall� 2012� to� Winter� 2013�7�

Fall� 2013� to� Winter� 2014�8�

Elementary� Gradua>on 2014�Average� of� Percent� Meeting� Projec>on� 42.5� 38.8�

Average� of� Projected�� owth�� ean� 3.0� 2.8�

Average� of� Actual� Mean� Growth� 1.9� 1.2�

Average� of� Projected�� owth� Index� (1.1)� (1.6)�


Fall 2012 to Winter 2013�6�



Elementary Gradua>on 2015�Average of Percent Mee>ng Projec>on� 50.7� 47.8� 46.4�Average of Projected Growth Mean� 3.0� 3.0� 2.8�Average of Actual Mean Growth� 2.4� 2.2� 1.8�Average of Projected Growth Index� (0.6)� (0.8)� (1.0)�

95.0�

90.0�

85.0�

80.0�

75.0�

70.0�

65.0�

60.0�

55.0�

50.0�

45.0�

40.0�

35.0�

30.0�

25.0�

20.0�

15.0�

10.0�

5.0�

0.0�

(5.0)�

(10.0)�

100.0�







Elementary Gradua>on 2016�Average of Percent Mee>ng Projec>on� 44.9� 47.3� 55.4�Average of Projected Growth Mean� 5.0� 3.0� 3.0�Average of Actual Mean Growth� 4.2� 2.8� 3.1�Average of Projected Growth Index� (0.8)� (0.2)� 0.1�

95.0�

90.0�

85.0�

80.0�

75.0�

70.0�

65.0�

60.0�

55.0�

50.0�

45.0�

40.0�

35.0�

30.0�

25.0�

20.0�

15.0�

10.0�

5.0�

0.0�

(5.0)�

(10.0)�

100.0�







Elementary Gradua>on 2017�Average of Percent Mee>ng Projec>on� 47.9� 51.6� 56.7�Average of Projected Growth Mean� 5.0� 5.0� 3.0�Average of Actual Mean Growth� 4.4� 4.4� 3.1�Average of Projected Growth Index� (0.6)� (0.6)� 0.1�

95.0�

90.0�

85.0�

80.0�

75.0�

70.0�

65.0�

60.0�

55.0�

50.0�

45.0�

40.0�

35.0�

30.0�

25.0�

20.0�

15.0�

10.0�

5.0�

0.0�

(5.0)�

(10.0)�

100.0�







Elementary Gradua>on 2018�Average of Percent Mee>ng Projec>on� 47.3� 57.8� 44.4�Average of Projected Growth Mean� 6.0� 5.0� 5.0�Average of Actual Mean Growth� 4.9� 6.3� 3.8�Average of Projected Growth Index� (1.2)� 1.3� (1.2)�

95.0�

90.0�

85.0�

80.0�

75.0�

70.0�

65.0�

60.0�

55.0�

50.0�

45.0�

40.0�

35.0�

30.0�

25.0�

20.0�

15.0�

10.0�

5.0�

0.0�

(5.0)�

(10.0)�

100.0�




100.0�

95.0�

90.0�

85.0�

80.0�

75.0�

70.0�

65.0�

60.0�

55.0�

50.0�

45.0�

40.0�

35.0�

30.0�

25.0�

20.0�

15.0�

10.0�

5.0�

0.0�

(5.0)�

(10.0)�



Fall� 2013� to� Winter� 2014�3�

Fall� 2014� to� Winter� 2015�4�




Average� of� Projected�� owth� Index� 2.2� 1.5�


100.0�

95.0�

90.0�

85.0�

80.0�

75.0�

70.0�

65.0�

60.0�

55.0�

50.0�

45.0�

40.0�

35.0�

30.0�

25.0�

20.0�

15.0�

10.0�

5.0�

0.0�

(5.0)�

(10.0)�



Fall� 2013� to� Winter� 2014�2�

Fall� 2014� to� Winter� 2015�3�






100.0�

95.0�

90.0�

85.0�

80.0�

75.0�

70.0�

65.0�

60.0�

55.0�

50.0�

45.0�

40.0�

35.0�

30.0�

25.0�

20.0�

15.0�

10.0�

5.0�

0.0�

(5.0)�

(10.0)�



Fall� 2014� to� Winter� 2015�2�



Average� of� Actual� Mean� Growth� 8.4�

Average� of� Projected�� owth� Index� 1.8�


100.0�

95.0�

90.0�

85.0�

80.0�

75.0�

70.0�

65.0�

60.0�

55.0�

50.0�

45.0�

40.0�

35.0�

30.0�

25.0�

20.0�

15.0�

10.0�

5.0�

0.0�

(5.0)�

(10.0)�

CCSD 181 MAP Projected Growth Summary -‐ Reading Cohort 2013�

MAP_Student_Growth_Summary_Report_District.xlsx -‐ F-‐W Reading Cohort Chart 2013 2/26/2015 -‐ Page 105 of 113

Fall� 2012� to� Winter� 2013�8�




Average� of� Projected�� owth� Index� (1.9)�


100.0�

95.0�

90.0�

85.0�

80.0�

75.0�

70.0�

65.0�

60.0�

55.0�

50.0�

45.0�

40.0�

35.0�

30.0�

25.0�

20.0�

15.0�

10.0�

5.0�

0.0�

(5.0)�

(10.0)�



Fall� 2012� to� Winter� 2013�7�

Fall� 2013� to� Winter� 2014�8�




Average� of� Projected�� owth� Index� 0.1� (1.0)�





Elementary Gradua>on 2015�Average of Percent Mee>ng Projec>on� 56.4� 52.9� 45.1�Average of Projected Growth Mean� 2.0� 2.0� 2.0�Average of Actual Mean Growth� 2.5� 2.4� 1.0�Average of Projected Growth Index� 0.5� 0.3� (1.0)�

95.0�

90.0�

85.0�

80.0�

75.0�

70.0�

65.0�

60.0�

55.0�

50.0�

45.0�

40.0�

35.0�

30.0�

25.0�

20.0�

15.0�

10.0�

5.0�

0.0�

(5.0)�

(10.0)�

100.0�







Elementary Gradua>on 2016�Average of Percent Mee>ng Projec>on� 60.3� 56.4� 52.3�Average of Projected Growth Mean� 2.4� 2.0� 2.0�Average of Actual Mean Growth� 3.4� 2.7� 2.2�Average of Projected Growth Index� 1.0� 0.6� 0.2�

95.0�

90.0�

85.0�

80.0�

75.0�

70.0�

65.0�

60.0�

55.0�

50.0�

45.0�

40.0�

35.0�

30.0�

25.0�

20.0�

15.0�

10.0�

5.0�

0.0�

(5.0)�

(10.0)�

100.0�








95.0�

90.0�

85.0�

80.0�

75.0�

70.0�

65.0�

60.0�

55.0�

50.0�

45.0�

40.0�

35.0�

30.0�

25.0�

20.0�

15.0�

10.0�

5.0�

0.0�

(5.0)�

(10.0)�

100.0�







Elementary Gradua>on 2019�Average of Percent Mee>ng Projec>on� 58.6� 62.5�Average of Projected Growth Mean� 4.1� 3.1�Average of Actual Mean Growth� 5.1� 4.7�Average of Projected Growth Index� 1.0� 1.7�

95.0�

90.0�

85.0�

80.0�

75.0�

70.0�

65.0�

60.0�

55.0�

50.0�

45.0�

40.0�

35.0�

30.0�

25.0�

20.0�

15.0�

10.0�

5.0�

0.0�

(5.0)�

(10.0)�

100.0�




100.0�

95.0�

90.0�

85.0�

80.0�

75.0�

70.0�

65.0�

60.0�

55.0�

50.0�

45.0�

40.0�

35.0�

30.0�

25.0�

20.0�

15.0�

10.0�

5.0�

0.0�

(5.0)�

(10.0)�



Fall� 2013� to� Winter� 2014�2�

Fall� 2014� to� Winter� 2015�3�






100.0�

95.0�

90.0�

85.0�

80.0�

75.0�

70.0�

65.0�

60.0�

55.0�

50.0�

45.0�

40.0�

35.0�

30.0�

25.0�

20.0�

15.0�

10.0�

5.0�

0.0�

(5.0)�

(10.0)�



Fall� 2014� to� Winter� 2015�2�




Average� of� Projected�� owth� Index� 2.4�


Student Growth Summary Report Aggregate by School Term:



Elm Elementary School Mathematics



n RIT

Std Dev

Mean Std RIT Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




3 36 203.3 12.8 208.4 11.2 5.1 5.2 0.9 36 6.1 -0.9 83.6 17 47.2 4 46 218.7 14.2 220.5 12.6 1.8 6.9 1.0 46 5.1 -3.2 35.3 17 37.0 5 52 226.3 15.5 230.2 15 3.9 6.5 0.9 52 5.0 -1.1 78.0 26 50.0





Elm Elementary School Reading


Fall 2012 Winter 2013 Actual Growth Projected Growth Grade (Winter 2013) Count Mean Std

RIT Dev Mea

n RIT

Std Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




3 36 203.2 9.5 208.4 10.5 5.2 7.5 1.3 36 4.1 1.1 126.8 20 55.6 4 46 211.5 12.7 213.8 11.6 2.3 6.9 1.0 46 3.0 -0.7 76.7 23 50.0 5 52 219.6 11.1 222.3 11.5 2.7 6.6 0.9 52 2.4 0.3 112.5 30 57.7








n RIT

Std Dev

Mean Std RIT Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




2 46 190.2 10.8 195.7 9.9 5.5 4.4 0.7 46 6.6 -1.0 83.3 22 47.8 3 60 201.4 12.5 211.2 14 9.7 6.6 0.9 60 6.1 3.7 159.0 45 75.0 4 47 216.3 15.1 222.1 13.9 5.8 7.5 1.1 47 5.0 0.8 116.0 19 40.4 5 52 224.8 12.5 231.1 13.2 6.3 6.0 0.8 52 5.0 1.3 126.0 32 61.5








n RIT

Std Dev

Mean RIT

Std Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




2 46 187.9 14.3 196.6 10.7 8.6 9.4 1.4 46 6.9 1.7 124.6 24 52.2 3 59 196.8 15.7 205.4 12.7 8.5 7.3 1.0 59 4.3 4.2 197.7 43 72.9 4 46 209.7 12.3 212.5 10.8 2.8 5.9 0.9 46 3.2 -0.4 87.5 20 43.5 5 52 217.3 13.0 220.9 13.1 3.6 6.1 0.8 52 2.5 1.1 144.0 31 59.6




Winter 2014-2015 Community Consolidated School District 181 None Yes Fall 2014 to Winter 2015




n RIT

Std Dev

Mean RIT

Std Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




1 1 203.0 214.0 11.0 0.0 1 6.0 5.0 183.3 1 100.0 2 56 192.7 12.5 201.4 10.5 8.7 6.0 0.8 56 6.4 2.2 135.9 41 73.2 3 51 201.0 11.1 211.4 14.1 10.4 7.2 1.0 51 6.0 4.4 173.3 39 76.5 4 64 217.4 15.3 222.9 13.3 5.5 8.5 1.1 64 5.0 0.4 110.0 30 46.9 5 51 221.2 12.4 225.0 11.6 3.7 6.3 0.9 51 5.0 -1.3 74.0 23 45.1








n RIT

Std Dev

Mean Std RIT Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




1 1 212.0 214.0 2.0 0.0 1 11.0 -9.0 18.2 0 0.0 2 56 190.2 14.9 198.5 11.9 8.3 8.7 1.2 56 6.8 1.5 122.1 32 57.1 3 51 200.1 12.5 206.5 11.3 6.4 7.6 1.1 51 4.2 2.2 152.4 36 70.6 4 64 206.9 15.0 212.3 12.6 5.4 10.0 1.3 64 3.2 2.2 168.8 40 62.5 5 51 216.5 11.3 220.3 9.4 3.8 7.3 1.0 51 2.5 1.3 152.0 29 56.9





MADISON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Mathematics



n RIT

Std Dev

Mean RIT

Std Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




3 78 203.9 10.5 207.5 11.3 3.6 5.4 0.6 78 6.1 -2.5 59.0 31 39.7 4 65 217.4 12.3 222.3 12.6 4.9 5.6 0.7 65 5.0 -0.1 98.0 33 50.8 5 89 224.4 12.9 227.6 13.1 3.1 6.1 0.6 89 5.0 -1.9 62.0 31 34.8





MADISON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Reading



n RIT

Std Dev

Mean RIT

Std Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




3 78 203.9 12.0 207.7 12.2 3.8 7.7 0.9 78 4.1 -0.3 92.7 39 50.0 4 66 214.0 10.8 215.3 12.6 1.3 6.3 0.8 66 3.0 -1.7 43.3 28 42.4 5 89 219.4 10.6 223.4 10.8 4.0 6.6 0.7 89 2.4 1.6 166.7 55 61.8








n RIT

Std Dev

Mean RIT

Std Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




2 65 188.1 12.0 196.7 10.8 8.6 6.8 0.8 65 6.7 1.9 128.4 42 64.6 3 55 200.6 12.5 209.8 13.2 9.2 6.0 0.8 55 6.0 3.1 153.3 40 72.7 4 64 215.3 12.1 223.3 11.6 8.0 6.2 0.8 64 5.0 3.0 160.0 45 70.3 5 82 225.2 10.8 229.5 10.7 4.3 4.9 0.5 82 5.0 -0.7 86.0 40 48.8








n RIT

Std Dev

Mean RIT

Std Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




2 63 183.7 16.9 195.6 14.8 11.9 8.4 1.1 63 7.2 4.7 165.3 46 73.0 3 55 203.9 12.0 209.2 11.4 5.3 6.1 0.8 55 4.1 1.3 129.3 33 60.0 4 64 212.2 10.7 217.4 10.1 5.2 5.4 0.7 64 3.1 2.2 167.7 43 67.2 5 82 220.4 11.2 223.7 10.5 3.3 6.8 0.8 82 2.3 1.0 143.5 47 57.3








n RIT

Std Dev

Mean Std RIT Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




2 55 189.2 10.6 195.8 8.8 6.6 6.5 0.9 55 6.7 -0.1 98.5 27 49.1 3 60 202.3 11.3 211.1 11 8.8 5.9 0.8 60 6.0 2.8 146.7 42 70.0 4 78 218.2 12.4 223.8 12.4 5.6 6.3 0.7 78 5.0 0.6 112.0 44 56.4 5 63 227.6 10.9 232.0 10.8 4.4 4.9 0.6 63 5.0 -0.6 88.0 33 52.4








RIT Dev Mean Std

RIT Dev Mean

Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




2 55 192.1 11.1 197.2 10.1 5.0 9.4 1.3 55 6.6 -1.6 75.8 23 41.8 3 60 203.9 10.4 209.7 9.7 5.8 5.8 0.7 60 4.0 1.8 145.0 44 73.3 4 78 213.8 11.4 218.2 10.5 4.3 5.8 0.7 78 3.0 1.3 143.3 50 64.1 5 63 222.0 9.8 224.6 10.3 2.6 5.9 0.7 63 2.3 0.3 113.0 36 57.1





MONROE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Mathematics



n RIT

Std Dev

Mean Std RIT Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




3 80 205.0 10.8 210.2 9.8 5.2 6.3 0.7 80 6.0 -0.8 86.7 41 51.2 4 70 215.0 13.3 219.6 13.3 4.7 5.7 0.7 70 5.0 -0.3 94.0 35 50.0 5 78 224.9 11.7 228.6 11.2 3.7 6.0 0.7 78 5.0 -1.3 74.0 34 43.6





MONROE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Reading



RIT Dev Mean Std

RIT Dev Mean

Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




3 80 201.6 12.2 207.0 10 5.4 8.0 0.9 80 4.2 1.3 128.6 44 55.0 4 70 209.2 12.5 213.9 10.4 4.7 7.0 0.8 70 3.2 1.5 146.9 44 62.9 5 78 218.9 9.4 222.9 9.2 4.0 6.7 0.8 78 2.5 1.5 160.0 52 66.7








n RIT

Std Dev

Mean Std RIT Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




2 67 190.1 12.7 197.6 10 7.5 7.3 0.9 67 6.6 0.9 113.6 38 56.7 3 75 204.9 12.7 213.5 11.6 8.6 6.3 0.7 75 6.0 2.6 143.3 52 69.3 4 62 221.0 14.8 227.6 14.8 6.6 6.6 0.8 62 5.1 1.5 129.4 35 56.5 5 81 226.3 10.2 230.5 9.7 4.2 6.6 0.7 81 5.0 -0.8 84.0 38 46.9








n RIT

Std Dev

Mean Std RIT Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




2 67 189.0 15.1 196.4 12.8 7.4 8.4 1.0 67 6.9 0.6 107.2 39 58.2 3 75 201.1 14.1 206.2 13.8 5.0 7.5 0.9 75 4.1 0.9 122.0 42 56.0 4 62 210.7 11.8 213.0 14.3 2.3 7.2 0.9 62 3.1 -0.7 74.2 30 48.4 5 81 216.5 10.8 222.1 9.8 5.6 7.3 0.8 81 2.6 3.0 215.4 55 67.9








n RIT

Std Dev

Mean RIT

Std Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




2 70 190.2 11.9 198.3 11.7 8.1 7.0 0.8 70 6.6 1.5 122.7 45 64.3 3 62 206.9 16.0 213.1 16.6 6.2 6.9 0.9 62 6.0 0.2 103.3 36 58.1 4 83 217.7 11.6 223.1 11.7 5.3 6.1 0.7 83 5.0 0.3 106.0 43 51.8 5 70 227.8 13.5 231.6 12.6 3.8 6.1 0.7 70 5.0 -1.2 76.0 33 47.1








n RIT

Std Dev

Mean RIT

Std Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




2 70 191.8 15.8 196.6 14.6 4.8 6.7 0.8 70 6.6 -1.8 72.7 31 44.3 3 62 202.9 12.5 205.1 11.5 2.2 7.7 1.0 62 4.1 -1.8 53.7 24 38.7 4 83 210.0 11.8 214.2 10.7 4.2 6.5 0.7 83 3.1 1.0 135.5 48 57.8 5 70 216.9 12.2 220.7 11.4 3.7 7.5 0.9 70 2.5 1.3 148.0 43 61.4





Oak Elementary School Mathematics



RIT Dev Mean Std

RIT Dev Mean

Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




3 44 204.6 9.1 215.0 7.9 10.4 5.4 0.8 44 6.0 4.4 173.3 36 81.8 4 50 218.9 13.1 223.4 13.1 4.5 5.6 0.8 50 5.0 -0.5 90.0 26 52.0 5 48 228.4 13.6 233.2 13.9 4.8 4.7 0.7 48 5.0 -0.2 96.0 23 47.9





Oak Elementary School Reading



RIT Dev Mean Std

RIT Dev Mean

Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




3 44 201.9 10.0 212.3 9.6 10.4 6.8 1.0 44 4.2 6.2 247.6 38 86.4 4 51 212.4 9.8 216.8 10.5 4.3 6.6 0.9 51 3.0 1.3 143.3 30 58.8 5 47 221.4 9.7 226.1 8.6 4.7 5.4 0.8 47 2.2 2.5 213.6 34 72.3








RIT Dev Mean Std

RIT Dev Mean

Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




2 36 188.6 9.7 196.8 8.9 8.1 6.3 1.1 36 6.7 1.4 120.9 23 63.9 3 40 202.9 10.4 211.1 9.7 8.2 5.7 0.9 40 6.1 2.2 134.4 27 67.5 4 43 220.2 14.8 226.9 14.2 6.7 6.5 1.0 43 5.0 1.7 134.0 26 60.5 5 44 227.3 16.0 231.4 16.5 4.1 5.0 0.8 44 5.0 -0.9 82.0 23 52.3








n RIT

Std Dev

Mean Std RIT Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




2 35 183.4 13.4 195.0 9.3 11.6 9.7 1.7 35 7.2 4.4 161.1 25 71.4 3 40 201.3 11.8 208.0 10.6 6.7 8.3 1.3 40 4.1 2.6 163.4 25 62.5 4 43 212.3 13.6 217.3 12.5 5.0 7.0 1.1 43 3.0 2.0 166.7 27 62.8 5 42 218.3 14.4 223.1 12.6 4.8 7.0 1.1 42 2.4 2.4 200.0 24 57.1








RIT Dev Mean Std

RIT Dev Mean

Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




2 45 190.6 8.9 198.1 8.9 7.5 5.8 0.9 45 6.6 1.0 113.6 26 57.8 3 46 204.7 12.9 215.3 15.4 10.6 6.4 1.0 46 6.0 4.6 176.7 37 80.4 4 44 220.0 16.4 226.1 15.1 6.1 7.4 1.1 44 5.0 1.1 122.0 24 54.5 5 51 225.0 16.1 230.8 16.7 5.8 4.7 0.7 51 5.0 0.8 116.0 34 66.7








n RIT

Std Dev

Mean Std RIT Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




2 45 188.0 12.9 198.7 9.4 10.8 8.4 1.3 45 6.9 3.9 156.5 28 62.2 3 46 205.9 10.3 211.0 10.3 5.1 6.2 0.9 46 4.0 1.1 127.5 28 60.9 4 43 209.5 11.9 215.1 10.1 5.6 8.4 1.3 43 3.1 2.4 180.6 28 65.1 5 51 217.2 14.4 221.2 13.7 4.0 6.8 1.0 51 2.5 1.5 160.0 34 66.7





PROSPECT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Mathematics



n RIT

Std Dev

Mean Std RIT Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




2 1 3 81 206.4 10.6 209.2 9.5 2.8 6.4 0.7 81 6.0 -3.2 46.7 26 32.1 4 77 216.9 18.1 222.8 16 5.9 6.7 0.8 77 5.0 0.9 118.0 40 51.9 5 72 226.4 10.8 231.7 11.8 5.2 6.1 0.7 72 5.0 0.2 104.0 37 51.4





PROSPECT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Reading



n RIT

Std Dev

Mean Std RIT Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




2 1 3 81 202.9 11.1 205.4 11 2.6 6.6 0.7 81 4.1 -1.5 63.4 37 45.7 4 77 211.0 15.6 217.3 12.8 6.3 6.6 0.8 77 3.1 3.1 203.2 59 76.6 5 72 219.6 12.3 222.6 11 3.0 7.8 0.9 72 2.5 0.6 120.0 38 52.8








RIT Dev Mea

n RIT

Std Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




1 1 197.0 204.0 7.0 0.0 1 7.0 0.0 100.0 1 100.0 2 70 190.0 11.5 199.4 10.9 9.4 6.2 0.8 70 6.6 2.8 142.4 46 65.7 3 55 206.0 9.2 211.1 10.8 5.1 5.8 0.8 55 6.0 -0.9 85.0 28 50.9 4 67 215.7 13.0 222.2 13.7 6.5 7.1 0.9 67 5.0 1.5 130.0 35 52.2 5 84 227.1 10.8 230.4 10.5 3.3 5.4 0.6 84 5.0 -1.7 66.0 32 38.1








n RIT

Std Dev

Mean RIT

Std Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




2 70 188.2 14.9 196.9 12.9 8.7 8.9 1.1 70 6.9 1.8 126.1 42 60.0 3 55 196.4 13.4 201.4 13.5 5.0 7.7 1.0 55 4.4 0.6 113.6 29 52.7 4 66 211.0 12.9 216.8 12.4 5.8 7.3 0.9 66 3.0 2.8 193.3 44 66.7 5 84 221.0 11.5 224.3 10.8 3.3 5.9 0.6 84 2.3 1.0 143.5 53 63.1








n RIT

Std Dev

Mean Std RIT Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




2 59 189.6 11.0 197.3 9.4 7.7 7.2 0.9 59 6.6 1.2 116.7 32 54.2 3 64 200.0 10.9 208.7 12.5 8.7 6.1 0.8 64 6.1 2.6 142.6 45 70.3 4 85 218.4 10.7 226.8 10.5 8.4 6.3 0.7 85 5.0 3.4 168.0 58 68.2 5 77 227.2 14.6 230.9 15.5 3.7 5.2 0.6 77 5.0 -1.3 74.0 37 48.1








n RIT

Std Dev

Mean RIT

Std Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




2 59 185.6 15.0 191.5 14.4 5.9 8.8 1.2 59 7.1 -1.2 83.1 26 44.1 3 64 199.4 12.7 204.9 12.2 5.5 7.2 0.9 64 4.3 1.2 127.9 36 56.3 4 85 210.9 10.1 217.5 10.3 6.6 6.4 0.7 85 3.1 3.6 212.9 64 75.3 5 77 218.8 13.0 222.7 13.5 3.8 6.3 0.7 77 2.4 1.5 158.3 44 57.1





THE LANE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Mathematics



n RIT

Std Dev

Mean Std RIT Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




3 57 204.5 10.5 208.3 10 3.9 4.7 0.6 57 6.0 -2.2 65.0 25 43.9 4 64 216.3 11.9 219.3 12.6 3.0 5.6 0.7 64 5.0 -2.0 60.0 26 40.6 5 77 226.8 12.3 230.3 12 3.4 4.9 0.6 77 5.0 -1.6 68.0 27 35.1





THE LANE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Reading



n RIT

Std Dev

Mean Std RIT Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




3 56 204.4 11.9 208.0 10 3.6 7.4 1.0 56 4.0 -0.4 90.0 24 42.9 4 64 213.3 11.1 217.4 10.5 4.1 5.9 0.7 64 3.0 1.1 136.7 38 59.4 5 77 220.9 10.9 222.9 10.6 2.0 6.4 0.7 77 2.3 -0.3 87.0 40 51.9








n RIT

Std Dev

Mean RIT

Std Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




2 65 189.3 12.3 196.6 11.6 7.3 6.5 0.8 65 6.7 0.6 109.0 38 58.5 3 56 205.5 15.9 212.8 17.8 7.3 6.6 0.9 56 6.1 1.3 119.7 33 58.9 4 68 219.3 13.5 224.6 13.7 5.3 6.9 0.8 68 5.0 0.2 106.0 40 58.8 5 69 224.9 13.0 227.2 11.9 2.4 5.8 0.7 69 5.0 -2.6 48.0 26 37.7








n RIT

Std Dev

Mean RIT

Std Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




2 65 186.8 16.2 194.6 15.4 7.7 8.7 1.1 65 7.0 0.8 110.0 34 52.3 3 57 201.8 15.0 206.8 17.2 5.0 8.3 1.1 57 4.2 0.8 119.0 32 56.1 4 68 212.0 13.0 215.8 12.1 3.8 6.6 0.8 68 3.0 0.8 126.7 38 55.9 5 69 217.6 11.7 222.0 11.7 4.4 5.9 0.7 69 2.4 2.0 183.3 45 65.2








n RIT

Std Dev

Mean RIT

Std Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




1 6 2 53 188.1 16.8 196.8 14.5 8.7 7.6 1.1 53 6.7 2.0 129.9 33 62.3 3 68 205.9 13.3 213.8 13.9 7.9 5.9 0.7 68 6.0 1.8 131.7 46 67.6 4 64 215.0 14.4 221.9 13.4 6.9 7.2 0.9 64 5.0 1.8 138.0 45 70.3 5 63 224.1 11.3 228.6 11.9 4.4 5.9 0.7 63 5.0 -0.6 88.0 30 47.6








n RIT

Std Dev

Mean Std RIT Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




2 53 187.2 17.0 196.6 15 9.4 9.6 1.3 53 6.9 2.5 136.2 36 67.9 3 67 203.5 11.6 208.0 10.3 4.5 6.9 0.8 67 4.1 0.4 109.8 38 56.7 4 63 210.5 11.5 213.7 11.6 3.2 7.1 0.9 63 3.1 0.0 103.2 35 55.6 5 63 219.3 10.6 222.0 10.6 2.7 5.7 0.7 63 2.4 0.3 112.5 36 57.1





WALKER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Mathematics



n RIT

Std Dev

Mean Std RIT Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




3 43 201.7 11.8 207.7 9.9 6.1 6.4 1.0 43 6.1 0.0 100.0 22 51.2 4 64 218.1 12.3 222.7 12.2 4.7 5.0 0.6 64 5.0 -0.4 94.0 32 50.0 5 49 226.2 14.5 232.5 13.5 6.3 5.4 0.8 49 5.0 1.3 126.0 31 63.3





WALKER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Reading



RIT Dev Mean Std

RIT Dev Mean

Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




3 43 200.2 11.5 205.1 9.4 5.0 7.4 1.1 43 4.2 0.7 119.0 22 51.2 4 63 213.3 9.4 217.2 8.8 3.8 6.4 0.8 63 3.0 0.9 126.7 38 60.3 5 49 220.8 11.2 224.3 10.5 3.6 6.1 0.9 49 2.3 1.2 156.5 31 63.3








n RIT

Std Dev

Mean Std RIT Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




2 31 181.7 13.7 192.2 9.5 10.5 7.3 1.3 31 7.3 3.2 143.8 21 67.7 3 48 202.6 11.7 210.2 12.6 7.6 6.2 0.9 48 6.0 1.6 126.7 30 62.5 4 57 215.2 13.5 223.0 14.1 7.8 5.8 0.8 57 5.0 2.8 156.0 41 71.9 5 42 224.8 11.8 229.9 12.5 5.1 6.5 1.0 42 5.0 0.1 102.0 19 45.2








n RIT

Std Dev

Mean Std RIT Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




2 31 177.9 18.3 191.2 15.2 13.3 7.8 1.4 31 7.6 5.6 175.0 26 83.9 3 48 200.8 10.7 204.8 11.5 3.9 7.4 1.1 48 4.2 -0.3 92.9 25 52.1 4 57 210.2 12.0 215.9 12 5.7 6.0 0.8 57 3.1 2.6 183.9 43 75.4 5 42 216.5 12.1 220.9 12.4 4.4 6.9 1.1 42 2.5 2.0 176.0 27 64.3








n RIT

Std Dev

Mean RIT

Std Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




2 47 191.1 12.0 198.3 10.1 7.3 6.2 0.9 47 6.4 0.8 114.1 26 55.3 3 62 202.5 13.2 208.9 13.7 6.4 6.9 0.9 62 6.1 0.3 104.9 33 53.2 4 42 217.9 11.9 223.3 11.5 5.4 6.2 1.0 42 5.0 0.4 108.0 23 54.8 5 64 226.2 14.0 229.1 13.8 3.0 6.4 0.8 64 5.0 -2.0 60.0 28 43.8








n RIT

Std Dev

Mean RIT

Std Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




2 47 190.7 12.5 196.0 12.2 5.3 6.2 0.9 47 6.8 -1.4 77.9 22 46.8 3 62 200.6 13.2 205.0 13.3 4.4 7.1 0.9 62 4.2 0.2 104.8 33 53.2 4 42 209.6 11.8 213.5 11.4 4.0 4.5 0.7 42 3.2 0.8 125.0 26 61.9 5 64 219.0 10.9 223.0 10.4 3.9 6.9 0.9 64 2.4 1.5 162.5 41 64.1





Clarendon Hills Middle Mathematics



n RIT

Std Dev

Mean RIT

Std Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




6 206 233.3 13.4 236.5 13.7 3.2 5.6 0.4 205 3.0 0.2 106.7 118 57.6 7 236 238.6 13.7 240.8 13.4 2.2 5.3 0.3 236 3.0 -0.8 73.3 107 45.3 8 17 220.9 13.1 222.1 10.9 1.1 7.6 1.9 17 3.0 -1.9 36.7 8 47.1





Clarendon Hills Middle Reading



n RIT

Std Dev

Mean RIT

Std Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




6 206 224.3 10.7 227.1 10.8 2.8 5.6 0.4 206 2.0 0.8 140.0 116 56.3 7 236 228.4 10.4 230.8 10.8 2.4 7.5 0.5 236 2.0 0.4 120.0 125 53.0 8 21 220.0 10.5 219.1 11.8 -0.9 8.5 1.9 21 2.0 -2.9 -45.0 6 28.6








n RIT

Std Dev

Mean RIT

Std Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




6 209 232.2 14.3 235.1 14.6 2.9 5.6 0.4 209 3.0 -0.1 96.7 101 48.3 7 205 239.8 13.2 241.5 13.5 1.8 5.0 0.3 204 3.0 -1.3 60.0 92 45.1 8 3








n RIT

Std Dev

Mean RIT

Std Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




6 209 223.0 12.1 225.7 12.1 2.7 5.9 0.4 209 2.0 0.7 135.0 118 56.5 7 205 229.7 10.9 232.0 10.4 2.4 6.2 0.4 205 2.0 0.4 120.0 110 53.7 8 242 231.5 11.7 232.5 11.6 1.0 6.0 0.4 242 2.0 -1.0 50.0 100 41.3








n RIT

Std Dev

Mean RIT

Std Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




6 214 233.5 15.6 236.1 15.4 2.6 5.7 0.4 213 3.0 -0.4 86.7 118 55.4 7 208 238.7 14.5 241.8 14.5 3.1 5.9 0.4 206 3.0 0.1 103.3 108 52.4 8 198 246.3 14.9 248.4 13.9 2.2 5.4 0.4 195 2.8 -0.6 78.6 94 48.2








n RIT

Std Dev

Mean RIT

Std Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




6 214 223.7 11.9 226.6 11.9 2.9 6.0 0.4 214 2.0 0.9 145.0 122 57.0 7 208 228.1 11.0 230.3 11.2 2.2 6.8 0.5 208 2.0 0.2 110.0 108 51.9 8 199 233.8 10.4 235.6 10.9 1.7 6.2 0.4 199 2.0 -0.3 85.0 99 49.7





Hinsdale Middle Mathematics



RIT Dev Mea

n RIT

Std Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




6 255 232.3 13.6 234.1 13.7 1.8 6.4 0.4 255 3.0 -1.2 60.0 115 45.1 7 275 239.0 14.7 240.6 14.6 1.7 5.3 0.3 275 3.0 -1.3 56.7 110 40.0 8 11 214.3 8.9 212.4 13.7 -1.9 14.1 4.5 11 3.0 -4.9 -63.3 4 36.4





Hinsdale Middle Reading



n RIT

Std Dev

Mean RIT

Std Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




6 255 222.2 10.8 224.5 10.9 2.2 6.2 0.4 255 2.0 0.2 110.0 144 56.5 7 274 227.7 11.3 229.5 11.6 1.7 6.5 0.4 274 2.0 -0.3 85.0 147 53.6 8 24 214.2 11.6 215.3 10.9 1.2 11.6 2.4 24 2.2 -1.0 54.5 10 41.7








n RIT

Std Dev

Mean RIT

Std Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




6 233 233.1 14.3 236.6 14.8 3.5 5.9 0.4 233 3.0 0.5 116.7 135 57.9 7 279 238.7 15.3 241.7 15.8 3.1 5.7 0.3 276 3.0 0.1 103.3 159 57.6 8 270 243.8 16.2 245.3 17.3 1.5 6.4 0.4 268 2.8 -1.3 53.6 121 45.1








n RIT

Std Dev

Mean RIT

Std Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




6 231 222.2 12.5 225.0 12.6 2.8 7.6 0.5 231 2.0 0.7 140.0 131 56.7 7 280 228.0 11.7 230.1 11.6 2.1 6.1 0.4 280 2.0 0.1 105.0 147 52.5 8 269 230.4 12.0 230.9 13.5 0.5 7.5 0.5 269 2.0 -1.5 25.0 112 41.6








n RIT

Std Dev

Mean Std RIT Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




6 17 211.8 16.2 214.5 17.1 2.6 6.7 1.7 17 3.0 -0.4 86.7 6 35.3 7 185 234.8 17.7 237.5 17 2.7 5.5 0.4 185 3.0 -0.2 90.0 94 50.8 8 242 243.0 15.1 244.2 15.5 1.2 5.7 0.4 242 2.8 -1.6 42.9 94 38.8








n RIT

Std Dev

Mean RIT

Std Dev

Mean Growth

Std Dev

Sampling Error


Mean Projection

Growth Index




6 11 202.8 18.2 205.0 15.4 2.2 5.4 1.7 11 2.1 0.1 104.8 6 54.5 7 224 226.2 13.7 228.5 13.2 2.3 6.2 0.4 224 2.0 0.3 115.0 117 52.2 8 258 232.2 11.3 233.3 11.4 1.1 5.9 0.4 258 2.0 -0.9 55.0 113 43.8


Projected Growth Cohort Achievement History (Since Fall 2008)

Elementary Gradua@on Yes No Elementary Gradua>on 2008 3� 3�Elementary Gradua>on 2009 10� 8�Elementary Gradua>on 2010 13� 13�Elementary Gradua>on 2011 19� 13�Elementary Gradua>on 2012 24� 12�Elementary Gradua>on 2013 22� 18�Elementary Gradua>on 2014 22� 20�Elementary Gradua>on 2015 17� 16�Elementary Gradua>on 2016 18� 8�Elementary Gradua>on 2017 15� 3�Elementary Gradua>on 2018 10� 4�Elementary Gradua>on 2019 10�Elementary Gradua>on 2020 6� 1�Elementary Gradua>on 2021 2�Grand Total 191 119

Yes No 1� 2�6� 3�8� 5�10� 6�14� 4�10� 10�14� 7�11� 5�11� 1�9�6� 1�5�2� 1�1�

108 45

Yes No 2� 1�4� 5�5� 8�9� 7�10� 8�12� 8�8� 13�6� 11�7� 7�6� 3�4� 3�5�4�1�83 74

All Scores Reading Math

120�

Yes = Number Mee@ng or Exceeding Projected Growth


Projected Growth Cohort Achievement History (Since Fall 2008 continued)

All Measures

Total Count� Percent�

Yes� No� Yes� No�

District� 191� 119� 62%� 38%�

Elm� 111� 43� 72%� 28%�

Madison� 93� 62� 60%� 40%�

Monroe� 89� 69� 56%� 44%�

Oak� 108� 44� 71%� 29%�

Prospect� 94� 62� 60%� 40%�

The Lane � 90� 67� 57%� 43%�

Walker� 117� 35� 77%� 23%�

CHMS� 70� 66� 51%� 49%�

HMS� 65� 76� 46%� 54%�

Reading

Total Count Percent

Yes No Yes No

108 45 71% 29%

62 15 81% 19%

50 27 65% 35%

38 38 50% 50%

53 23 70% 30%

51 27 65% 35%

53 25 68% 32%

58 18 76% 24%

48 21 70% 30%

36 34 51% 49%

Math Total Count Percent

Yes No Yes No

83 74 53% 47%

49 28 64% 36%

43 35 55% 45%

51 31 62% 38%

55 21 72% 28%

43 35 55% 45%

37 42 47% 53%

59 17 78% 22%

22 45 33% 67%

29 42 41% 59%

Yes = Number/Percent Mee@ng or Exceeding Projected Growth 121�


Presentation Notes & General Conclusions•  The RIT for ALL cohort groups grew for all assessment cycles (one

test cycle to the next for all test cycles since 2008)

•  There are a few outlier numbers that need to be considered as part of any analysis (e.g., RIT scores and count of students assessed)

• Winter 2014 to Winter 2015 Comparison for Non-Cohort Groups

•  2015 Winter Reading RIT

– All grade levels matched or exceeded the Winter 2014 RIT

•  2015 Winter Math RIT

– All but one grade level (5th grade) matched or exceeded the Winter 2014 RIT

122�


Presentation Notes & General Conclusions (continued)•  Growth Index Comparisons for Fall 2014 to Winter 2015

•  READING - All grades except 8th grade achieved a positive growth index. This is one measure that demonstrates that the curriculum that is in the 2nd year of implementation is working

•  MATH - All grades but 5th and 8th grades achieved a positive growth index–  The 8th grade not achieving positive Growth Index scores could be

related to: the meaning students placed on the desire to score well on the assessment; a smaller number of students taking the exam at HMS in the Winter of 2014; and/or other factors.

–  The 5th grade not achieving positive Growth Index scores could be related to many issues, including but not limited to:•  Compacting content•  Grouping practices•  Accelerating students in content and/or grade levels•  Resources

123�


Next Steps• Establish more consistency for flexible grouping practices while allowing teachers the flexibility to make decisions about grouping practices based on the needs of the students and their teaching strengths.

•  Implement the adopted math resources and standards with extensive professional development for teachers.

• Continue professional development and implementation of English/Language Arts (ELA) standards, resources, and instructional practices within the continuous improvement cycle.

124�


Next Steps (continued)•  Identify if a standardized process is needed for determining when to

provide enriched and/or accelerated content to students at elementary level while allowing flexibility for teachers to make decisions based on the needs of students.

•  Identify/Standardize process and criteria for when to grade accelerate a small number of students to a higher grade level at the elementary level.

•  Provide more grade level articulation opportunities for math teachers in grades 5 and 6 after placement decisions are completed.

–  The goal is to provide 6th grade teachers an additional opportunity to determine if some additional assessments are needed for the incoming 6th grade students.

125�


Thank You


03/05/2015 - page 1 of íîó community consolidated school ......presentation content notes • the...

Documents