Its about, applying true identitys, to: Information fragments. Any fragments identity, are unique for its information type. This, will become a software, with an input; and: Output field.

If we feed, both the input, and output field; with enough, correct questions and answers: We should see the log network, of ques-tion to answer identification, and its different trials of logical cal-culation techniques.

There will be attempts, to stabilize the variable values, in both: In-formation identity, and different methods, for identity calculation. We may set up a powerful machine, to: "Bruteforce-meditate", un-til we can scan through the log, for: Correct, and new innovation results.

We may, then: Attempt to find a highly logical, and systematical: Terminology, for identity and calculation. This, might be the key, to: Omniscience.

Dec.07-2014: .VPTx8Research inside: Innovative information treatment, and innovation technology.Heading for: Formula #1.

I do, already have a suggestion, for the formula terminology. This formula, is named: .VPTx8. It, is still: Slightly unspecific, in its output. The user, will have to trust himself, and: Interpret, with its outputs. However, the interpretation aint completely independ-ent, from the users side. The answer is there, however its somewhat encrypted. The formula, is not complete, yet.

I believe, that the .VPTx8, may calculate forth, to any: Encrypted answer. However, the input question. I, also believe, that: As long as there are limits, to the scales, of: Inform-ative identity, and fragments: There will also, be a limit; to the bruteforce procedures.

The encryption problem, may come by: The way, the .VPTx8; is constructed, now: As the formula, will only generate: Outputs, with limited amounts of letters. This, could be solved with self-generating, general perspectives: Additive calculation structures, through the identification mathematics. I know, that there is always possible, to gather different information, into: General, ultimate symbols/perspectives.

Det myke underlaget = Basic starting point4-5-20 - 13-25-11-5 - 21-14-4-5-18-12-1-7-5-20+Kongen sitter = The targets context11-15-14-7-5-14 - 19-9-20-20-5-18+P = Ask angulation16-29=

45201336266686587173239667=

[X] det mcfzffhfehgagcbciffg=

det Mc.Fzffh-Feh, ga gcbc iffg=

Det, Mc.Fzffhfeh, ga bort, til gcbc; i flge noe.=

Det, Mc.Fennez-Feh, ga bort, til Great Britain: Complete, before Christ. I flge enkontrakt.=

Hva, Christian Frederik, ga fra seg, i flge Kieltraktaten: Den store staten, fiendligstilltav England, fr Kristus.-

The answer, didnt just become: Trone. However the formula, is examplifying in-side numerous interesting subcategories. Its working with the meaning, of the word: Trone. However I might have a bit of work left, before I can make Velopt: Give an-swers, which doesnt need interpretation.

[X] = Equivalent, to one of my abstract artworks. The calculation result, is only an abstract pattern. And needs therefore: To be interpreted. Either by the user, or by the computer. Which means, I should work with a unit for interpretation. All I can assume, of this, is: That it might be processed, with calculations: Working with a crossword setup.

.VPTx8 - AdditionThis formula, is built up from both, the: .VPTx4, and .VPTx7.To understand .VPTx8, you should read, here:https://www.dropbox.com/s/6xaja33qeag5iaz/025.%20.VPTx7.pdf?dl=0

The following, are an example of .VPTx8's: Stepwise, innovative calculation, of the words: "Det myke underlaget, kongen sitter p". I thought the answer, simply would be: "Trone". However, I got a positive suprise; becouse: The formula, are describing the input theme. This, could mean that .VPTx8; is suited for innovation.