01364794

4
11 OUT OF STEP PROTECTION IN MODERN POWER NETWORKS D Paunescu, F Lazar Transelectrica, Romanis B Pavlov J ZakonjSek NEK - NDC, Bulgaria ABB Power Technologies, Sweden Significant changes of load as well as faults and their clearance in power systems often result in electromechanical oscillations, which generally do not affect the system stability. Major disturbances might on thc other hand cause bigger oscillations, which can influence unwanted operation of different protection functions and in the most severe cases loss of synchronism (pole slip or so called out-of-step conditions) between generator groups located in different subsystems. .In the paper, we concentrate on so called “asynchronous operation” of power systems, which may characterize the operation of%dividual generating units as well as their groups (power plants) connected in parallel wilh the power system or even the operation of two interconnected power systems. The asynchronous mode of operation is characterized by deep aclive and reactive power oscillations with time limited constant excitation of synchronous machines. It produces important disturbances to the power system operating parameters, to the quality parameters of delivered electrical power, causes severe electric and mechanic stress of primary equipment, etc. It tends to extend very fast to the remaining parts of power system. Disconnection of subsystems in points closest to the electrical center of oscillation proved to prevent the best way collapse of a complete system. Development of modem technology made it possible to integrate the functionality of once very expensive and from the system point of view insufficiently selective generator pole slip protection devices into line protection terminals. It is at the same time adjusted to the specific system requirements like: operation during pole open conditions, oscillation development caused by the faults and during their clearance, etc. Additional arguments justifying the introduction of pole slip protection in modem power systems could be specified as follows. 1) UCTE recommendation regarding the prevention of “disturbance export” between interconnected systems by installation of pole slip protection on important tie lines. 2) Experiences gained during the analysis of major disturbances. 3) Possibilities of modem microprocessor based technology used in state of the art numerical devices. In the view of further UCTE extension towards the South ~ East Europe’ it has been decided by NEK-EAD in Bulgaria as well as by Translectrica in Romania to install pole slip protection on their all important tie lines. The paper describes, together with some theoretical background, also a practical example of applying pole slip protection on a 400 kV transmission line between S/S Tantareni (RO) and Kozloduy (BG) from two different points of view: system studies and selection of protection setting parameters. THEORETICAL BACKGROUND A two-machine model as presented in Figure I can always be used to present oscillating parts of power system regardless the amount of oscillating machines, which oscillate relative to each other. Figure I: Basic model of a two-machine system Power flow in a loss-less two machine system depends on voltage difference between left and right side EMFs it and E, respectively and total system impedance as defined by (1). Only corresponding reactance applies for loss-less conditions. ‘, (1) . . . . z, = z, + ZL + z, Active P and reactive Q power flows in relay point REL are functions of 6 angular difference between two EMFs as presented by the following equations. E .E, Q = -j. cos( 6) t ., Bulgaria represented by NEK - EAD and Romania represented by Transelectrica are regular UCTE members from 08 May 2003. 0 2004 The Institution of Electrical Engineers. Printed and published by the IEE, Michael Faraday House, Six Hills Way, Stevenage. SG1 2AY

Upload: lisused

Post on 18-Aug-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

01364794

TRANSCRIPT

11 OUT OF STEP PROTECTIONIN MODERNPOWER NETWORKS D Paunescu,F Lazar Transelectrica,Romanis B PavlovJ ZakonjSek NEK - NDC, BulgariaABB Power Technologies,Sweden Significant changes of loadas wellas faults andtheir clearanceinpowersystemsoftenresultin electromechanical oscillations, whichgenerally donot affect the system stability. Major disturbances might on thcotherhandcausebiggeroscillations,whichcan influenceunwantedoperationofdifferentprotection functionsandi nthemostseverecaseslossof synchronism(polesliporsocalledout-of-step conditions)betweengeneratorgroupslocatedin different subsystems. .In the paper, we concentrate on so called asynchronous operationof powersystems, whichmaycharacterize theoperation of%dividualgenerating units as wellas their groups (power plants)connectedin parallel wilh thepowersystemoreventheoperationoftwo interconnected power systems. The asynchronous mode of operation is characterized by deep acliveandreactive poweroscillations withtime limited constant excitation of synchronous machines. It producesimportant disturbancestothepowersystem operatingparameters,tothequalityparametersof deliveredelectricalpower,causessevereelectricand mechanicstress of primaryequipment, etc. It tendsto extend very fast to the remaining parts of power system. Disconnectionofsubsystemsinpointsclosesttothe electrical center of oscillation proved to prevent the best waycollapseofacompletesystem.Developmentof modemtechnologymadeitpossibletointegratethe functionalityofonceveryexpensiveandfromthe system pointof viewinsufficiently selective generator poleslipprotectiondevicesintolineprotection terminals. It is at the same time adjusted to the specific systemrequirementslike:operationduringpoleopen conditions, oscillation development caused by the faults and during their clearance, etc. Additional arguments justifying the introduction of pole slipprotectioninmodempowersystemscouldbe specifiedasfollows.1)UCTErecommendation regardingthepreventionofdisturbanceexport between interconnected systems by installationof pole slipprotectiononimportant tielines.2 ) Experiences gainedduringtheanalysisofmajordisturbances.3) Possibilitiesofmodemmicroprocessorbased technology used in state of the art numerical devices. IntheviewoffurtherUCTEextensiontowardsthe South ~ East Europe it has been decided by NEK-EAD inBulgaria as wellas by TranslectricainRomania to installpoleslipprotectionontheirallimportanttie lines.Thepaperdescribes,togetherwithsome theoreticalbackground,alsoapracticalexampleof applying pole slip protectionon a 400 kVtransmission linebetweenS/STantareni (RO)andKozloduy(BG) from two different pointsof view:system studies and selection of protection setting parameters. THEORETICAL BACKGROUND Atwo-machinemodelaspresentedinFigureIcan alwaysbeusedtopresentoscillatingpartsofpower system regardless theamountofoscillatingmachines, which oscillate relative to each other. Figure I : Basic model of a two-machine system Power flow in a loss-less two machine system depends on voltage difference between left and rightside EMFs itandE, respectively and total system impedance as defined by (1). Only corresponding reactance applies for loss-less conditions. ,(1) . .. .z, =z, +ZL +z, ActivePand reactiveQ powerflows in relaypoint REL are functions of6 angular difference between two EMFs as presented by the following equations. E. E,Q =-j.cos( 6) t ., Bulgaria representedbyNEK - EADandRomania representedbyTranselectricaareregularUCTE members from 08 May 2003. 0 2004 The Institution of Electrical Engineers. Printed and published by the IEE, Michael Faraday House, SixHills Way, Stevenage. SG1 2AY Here isk=lb?Rl/l&I , Diagram in Figure 2presents a typicalexampledftransmittedactiveandreactive power within the two-machine system asa function of angledifference6.Itisinterestingthatactiveand reactive powerdo notfollow the same dependence on rotor angle difference. The reactive power flow is at the same time dependent very much on difference between themagnitudesofbothEMFs.Thereisnoreactive power flow when theyareequal bymagnitude andin phase.Maximumreactivepowerappearswhenboth EMFs have opposite direction. Active power isinthis case zero. Thefirst partof active power dependence inFigure 2 for6 =(0 - 180) deg is known as a power-angle curve andwelldescribedinbasicliterature.Thesocalled equalareacriteriaisalsoawellknownapproach towards the estimation of dynamic stability for a power system and for this reason not addressed more in details within this paper. , 1,-Figure 2: Typical example of active and reactive power flow as a function of6 angle between two EMFs IMPEDANCEMEASUREDIN RELAY POINT Swingingofactiveandreactivepowerbetween differentpartsofasynchronouslyrunpowersystem reflectsalsoindynamicperformanceofmeasured impedances in different relay points. Measured current in relay point REL in Figure 1 follows the expression: TherelayvoltageasmeasuredinrelaypointRELis equal to: Impedanceasmeasuredbyimpedancerelaysinrelay point REL is this way equal to: If we place the relay point REL in coordinate center of an impedance plane, than it is possible to show that the impedance trajectories asseen bytheimpedance relay follows the equation of circles, as presented in Figure 3. The impedance trajectory passes in at least one point the system impedance line between impedance points-Zs,. and(Z, +Z,). This point is called "electrical center of oscillation",ECO. The diameter ofthecircledepends on value of factork=E, / E, and becomes infinite for the case whenk=1 . Impedance trajectory becomes in thiscaseastraight-lineperpendicularonthebefore mentioned system impedance line. It is evident that such performance of measured impedance may influence the securityofdistancerelaysonpowerlinesaswellas otherimpedancemeasuringelementsinthepower systems. Figure3:ImpedancetrajectoriesinrelaypointREL during pole slip conditions in a two-machine system 1 1 3Figure 4: Phase voltage and current in relay point at the beginning of pole slip and three consecutive slips Oscillationsarecharacteristicforphasecurrentsand voltagesaswellandpresentedforatypicalcasein Figure 4.Here we can observe typical increase of slip frequencyforconsecutiveoscillations,whichrequire adaptiveapproachalsoinoscillationdetection measuring elements, independent on basicprinciples of their operation. Unwantedoperation of overcurrent and undervoltage basedprotectionfunctionsinrelaypoint during system oscillations must be prevented by correct selectionoftheirsettingparameters.Operationof impedance measuringelementsmustbeprevented by specialoscillationdetectionelements,implemented in distance protectiondevices. OSCILLATIONDETECTIONBASEDON IMPEDANCEMEASUREMENT Differentoscillationdetectionmethodsareinuse worldwide.Twomostspreadbetweenthemareso calledM/AtandU . cosqmethods. The first one is implementedmainlyinlinedistancerelaysandthe second one in pole slip protectionused closed to bigger generating units. Within this paper we concentrate more onthefirstmethodbecauseitisimplementedalsoin protectionterminalsinstalledontielinesbetween Bulgaria and Romania. TheoperationofasocalledAZ/ At oscillation detectionprincipleisbasedonafact .that impedance measuredinrelaypointchangesduringoscillations relativelyslow in comparisonwith nearlyinstantaneous change fromloadtofaultimpedance duringdifferent faults in primaty system. Figure 5presents this principle by simplified schematic. ,-., -+Figure 5:=/ At principle based oscillation detection Oscillation OSC is detected if the impedance measured in relay point needs to enter the internal boundary INT with time delay longer than the time delay t set on time measuringelementafterithasenteredtheexternal boundary EXT. It should be noted that the time element needsanadaptivetimedelay,whichmustbefor consecutive slips shorter thanthe initial time delay for the first slip.This is of outmost importance in order to distinguish betweenfastconsecutiveslipsandslowly developing faults, whichappear forexampleinseries compensatednetworksorduringslowlydeveloping earthfaults (e.g.whenthefaultdevelops overanice coat around the phase conductor). Powersystemoscillationsareingeneralnotathree phasephenomena.Theycanbeinitiatedbydifferent faultsinpowersystemandmaydevelopfurtheron duringthefaultclearingprocessorduringthetime whenthepowersystemisstillinemergentstate. Typical example of such performance is development of oscillation over a power line, whichoperates only in a two-phasemodeduringthedead-timeofsingle-pole autoreclosing cycle. OUT-OF-STEPPROTECTIONONTIELINE BETWEEN BULGARIAAND ROMANIA Installation of out-of-stepprotectionon 400 kV tie lines between Bulgaria and Romania is justified by different reasons,asithasbeenalreadymentionedandalso proved on different practical examples. Specialistsfrompowerutilitiesinbothcountries performed a comprehensive study of systemconditions underwhichout-of-stepmodeofoperationbetween Bulgarianand Romanianpowersystems could appear withECO on or close to the 400 kV tie line Tantareni (RO)- Kozloduy(BG).Additionaltaskswerealso: determining the expected slip frequency and settings for the pole slip protections, whichare of the same design at both line ends. The results of studies confirmed that double circuit 400 kV line between SIS Tantareni and Kozloduy represents a very stable system connection. It is nearlyimpossible thatout-of-stepconditionswouldappearoverthis circuitundernormaloperatingconditions.The asynchronousoperationof generatingunitslocatedat theendsofthislinecouldstartonlyunderextreme system conditions.Oneof themconsiders 400kVtie linesSofiaWest(BG) ~ Nis(YU)andBlagoevgrad (BG) ~ Thessaloniki (GR)out of operation, export of 1000 MW from the BG power system and a three-phase shortcircuitat400kVKozloduyNPPbus-bar eliminated with0.5s time delay. Figure6 presentsthe impedance trajectory as seen by the pole slip protection installed in Tantareni (RO) end of the tie line. Measuredimpedance changes veryfastfrom pre-fault load conditions (-120 +j25) ohmto impedance marking theendof protectedline(Kozloduy).Faultclearance alsopresentsfastchangeinmeasuredimpedanceto approximately(0+j25)ohm.Herestartsslower movement of impedance in anticlockwise direction and exitstheimpedancemeasuringareacompletely.The oscillation wouldcontinue further on and even change itsdirectiontotheclockwiseone,ifitwouldbe permittedtocontinuewithoutanyactionfromthe installedpoleslipprotection,whichoperating characteristic is also presented in Figure 6. Measuredimpedancetrajectotyenterstheexternal impedance boundary again at approximately (-17+j60) ohmand withtime delay longer than 40 ms (set value) also the inner impedance bonndaty at (-17 +j40) ohm. SO 60 40 E d20 ?i n -20 4 0Figure 6:Impedance trajectory as seen by pole slip protection in Tantareni Si S after a three-phase fault at Kozloduy S/S Thisissufficientconditionforprotectiontodeclare system oscillation. Big generation units behind line ends do not permit long oscillations with more than one slip. The pole slip protection is for this reason set to trip the corresponding circuit breaker even before the complete slipreallyappears,inthiscasewhenthemeasured impedancereachestheleAtrippinglineat approximately (-5 +j28) ohm. Theoperating characteristic of the poleslip protection appliedprovidesapossibilitytocontrolthetripping conditionswithrespecttothephaseanglebetween EMFsofpowergeneratorsinbothsubsystems.This preventsadditionalstressesofprimaryequipment.It alsoprovidesremotehack-uppossibilitiesforswings with their ECO behind the remote ends of the protected line (see the area around the Kozloduy Si S in Figure 6) .CONCLUSIONS Asynchronous operating conditions are a fact in modem powersystemsandshouldheeliminatedasfastas possible in order to keep theirstronger parts in normal operation.Introductionofpoleslipprotectionontie linesprovedtobeoneofthehestsolutions.This requires comprehensive stability studies under different operatingconditionsandin manycases alsoexcellent cooperation of experts from different utilities, and even different countries. Operating characteristics of applied pole slip protection devicesmustsecurecorrectoperationunderdifferent systemoperatingconditions.Theymustdetect oscillations caused by faults and similar big changes in powersystemaswellasoscillations,whichappear during emergent system operating conditions. References 1.YGPainthankar,2000,TransmissionNetwork Protection - Theoly and Practice 2. ABB Manual IMRK 506 074,06-2001