In that sense, that: prepro , allows to make , it : could assume rank, under the ranking : That prepro has opened me for : room and its lighting : In its basic meaning, that: Rooms and light, BastantKonstantert : being , a single Device , confluent functionally . Like, are: prepro ‘s possibilities: Veloptivt . As also can be defined as : Layered , Processing , of , rated Expansion . That ‘s when : prepro constitute the rank of commercial value : that by processing light through Expansion rank , make up, prepro ‘s rank -related value , upper Rank Grad, set on the basis of all global rank.

This is because : Rank , are: Human , total value : Different Expansion Preview , must constitute , on the basis RomEk- spansjonene only : Expanding BastantKonstentasjon . Reason , the : only expanding , and not Veloptiv . Is because: Room possibilities of expansion, consisting : of : Being able to define : i ekspansasjonen , such as: 1x ekspansasjon , etc. Have been , concluded , by: All Rank Value : The constituted Rank Value , to assert my rank : The value that it : if , it leaves : LysRommet , it can using further expand : 1x Ekspansasjon : Down .

Could underwriting, the rank value : To process Lagprosesseringsvis receive from future rank : At 2 = 1x expanded unit , thus : continue to 1x extra ek- spansasjon . Moreover , one begin to expand Using : room light processed , konstanta tion that: The light is stationary under its : Veloptive Rank Value Velopsjonsformelen ; described as:This takes place under the formula : X1 - A - Y ( = ) - X2 - B.

Where X1 is the input , and X2 is the output . You write in one text field in X1. And the result comes out of X2 . Based on the formula itself , the formula only bruteforce / try until it Veloptiske result.

A = Where letters from X1 are converted to values / numbers and letters will be linked to these as both input identi-fica- tion purposes and profit . Then Velopsjonsregelen set , and we will set one above calculation. All letters will be linked to values / mathematical starting points , and may consist of more than one number. Letter The value of what I call line length value.

B = Der letter to the longitudinal line valued and processed against to ascertain a different length line value in X2, as one answer to X1.

X1 = X2 .

If We have previously defines several different mathematical calculated both input and output , then study what was then arises as line length value of letters , as one Universal Pattern Veloptisk learn. A calculated at all calculated , and the answer to how Velopt Velopterer .

X1 - A - Y(=) - X2 - B.

Veloptive Formula.

Moreover, I have the project: prepro , which makes computer conscious of mathematics. Your computer will be due . Prepro ‘s teachings, could ascertain Velopsjon , method and innovation and research infrastructure to a Ultimatformel development / processing.

Quote from research log:Thus it is the definition of : = # = 1-1 ‘s prossesseringsresultat , that one must , in advance , have defined one , such as 2 ‘s 1-2 = 1-1, where 1 = 1 And you have to define in one , that 1-1 = 2, because in 1.1 , there are 2 , the calculated of 1 , 2, which is to say that 1 +1 , ie , 1-1 = 2 ‘s definition, which is not 2, but the way to 2 That is to say that 2 = 1 +1, and 1.1 .

When the machine can process , and we want it to define that: 1.1 = 1.2 .Based on this calculated result processing will be 1-1 = 2 So that one unit = two units .And the computer calculation , we can see that 1 = 2, 2 = 1 And thus , we can ascertain that there are even more energy.

First there is the input , which is one or more words. Each word is translated into visual language, since the part of the visual memo , as defined , to be the word . Then , one can , when one has stated that the visual language , as you say, based on rules. These should I define.

It need not be   Therefore, perhaps the program Velopsjonsspråk creates visually . I think this is because the language is based on an aesthetic rule formula , to be able to describe anything, and the outcome , will differ / be a variable / look like almost anything, but still be something specific .

And , it should be able to read again, the interpretation process. In facilities , may often be the case that multiple seg-ments of the visual, constitute a single letter . It will thus be the letter formula , thus the word and sentence meaning , which Velopteres .   That act , it must also be noted that the definition process of the subject (input ) , may not be car-ried out merely by entering the input .

The definition can be done as that one has a “book “ on the screen , where each page is a defini- tion method. Eg : 3D modeling , drawing, or mathematics , may be one of definition methods . Then begins the inter- pretation and com-parison part of the program to be very heavy. And , one might even define what is what, the different “ sides “ in the definition “ book” .   Something very important is that the language rule sets are generated based on the input defini-tion. Thus ObjektVel- opsjon within practical theories, take place at the regelsettingoppgavens result , ie : results of how definitions are trans- lated to the visual language .

So: What has been translated from the definition memo (input ) , in the form of words, or image , to something abstract, aesthetic and visual Shall be construed , as it is the same.   In it we translate between concrete , naturrotfestede , man-made definitions, and the abstract . Yes, the abstract , which is something that looks / behaves differently , but providing comprehensive, but not definitely , the same mean- ing, in his compound, encrypted / scrambled whole.

It’s like that right and left shoes are different, but still within the same context , ie : Left shoe is a distorted right shoes , and visa versa . In it we translate between these two , it will run a power of 100 % pure , basic information , and knowl-edge base. There is information , without it being informative . Clean energy in other words. Based on this energy , we let the rule set for the visual abstraction ; defined and formed.  

To Veloptere assume pure , undefined information. Thus the so-called “ energy “ , which is really just “ space definition” . Yes , to get anything from this , we must return to the abstract / encrypted infodefininerte result. This result , behaves like a custom distortion of the input . When we then naming / translator distortion back to words , we do it , without tilbakeforvrenge , against an undefined data or the defined input the info from before.   Now we let the program name encryption / abstraction / distorted , the result, on the basis of the general context of knowledge .

That is, assume the earth , custom tie downs , as the program looks on , as a natural relevance / compari- son. The program finds the information , which relates to the abstraction , in and among the program created : Ambient , context information . we can connect / bearing against . That is when we will achieve a so-called context.   And then we have come very far in Velopsjonsprosessen .

The clearer influence of context information , points of departure and regulations are , as we translate the definition and abstraction , the more Velopterte results ( our goal ) , will come out of the input Velopterte context. Context = The variable inputdefinisjonens and abstraction justifications for all their structure based funksjonsoppførsler in the room.

The object will be defined. And software ; For the first time , be “ aware “ of what the object really is . It will be some-thing that it perceives as earthy and faithful : Basic , as it may relate to abstractions , and not least , on the basis of partially defined / named : Abstract material, and reviews of abstract material principle .

The evaluations , conducted at the program draws and defines , trusts and poses / create / develop relevant , that builds , bit based / on the basis of previous bit: Concludes by comparing and make inner end rings . This makes the program by , on the basis of one [ reverse / ForvrengelsesVeloptert VeloptVelopt process ] , which I choose to call : VeloptVelopt - MinusMinorVelopt or .

VPT.VPT.VPT - Minor Minus .   A . VPT.VPT.VPT - Minor Minus process, when the program has learned to Veloptere through simpler, more intelligent , compressed , and less capacity demanding Velopsjonsprosesser . Do you see one pattern now? Yes, Velopt = Knowl- edge-based expansion , or the magnifying pattern , you might be so . All this will do so Velopt know, the context object is in.

Velopt will be all about context. And Velopt , may thus define a distorting . Velopt could create a novelty, the basis of an abstraction , which in turn comes from the input . Velopt will Veloptere !   But then comes the problem : At Velopt will not be able to found something from one future Veloptert standpoint. Com- puters are not suitable to travel in time with, yet. Software Time travel , by the way, something I work on autodidakts- formularekstrahere / Veloptere / develop , in my second research innovative project : prepro , which is Time = Rooms : Software Automation and explanation .

When there is room , for the information instantaneous reactions, regardless of capacity demands. The creation / for-mation, and not the process , the way computers work now. . VPT.VPT.VPT ‘s essence : An explanation of why Velopt , in the sense that it is only me and a few others here who are able to understand in the word Velopsjon . I do not know how it is to read about Velopsjoner . Because I ‘ve never been able to understand my own Veloptivitet , without describing it through Velopsjonsprosessen : To explain Velops- jonsprosess ,   Velopsjon is Velopsjonen in science frankly, historically , politically. Fact: Worldwide , in terms of knowledge , and not least , in this Veloptive doctrine / Velopsjonsprosessen , which is Velopsjonen of Velop-sjon , description of Velopsjon .

Then there is the text Velopsjonsprosess is Velopsjon . Velopsjon the process . But you do not understand Velopsjon- ens Velolpsjon without Velopsjonen is written as a process. But Velopsjonsprosess , you have not before you can Vel- optere , without realizing that Velopsjonen is already past ? Then , when Velopsprosessen , is written as Velopsjon : Do you understand what Velopsjonsprosess is . Velopsjonsprosess is , in the process: Velopsjon .

Veloptert as Velopsjon . written as Velopsjon to realize is difficult to understand, in the sense that I   ( As an introduc-tion to the next sentence block and further to the Velopsjonen , constituting Velopsjoners totality , in the sense that Velopsjoner constitute the same , as a theoretician more planning time period, within Velopsjoner a Velop- sjon . Of the text components from the text processing / Velopsjon . Now / text) l -| - ( note that the process / progress / proce-dure innovation , in fact , too: Velopsjonen , in this text, and the whole thread structure against: the end all Velopsjonen , a DeVelopsjon (Hint , English : develop ) of Velopsjonen . Do not get me wrong , it does not go down / decreases , develop / velopterer .   It reacts .

( Moreover, in the text: I realize , from this point in the text: Sentence Fund and Velopsjoners I begin to con- clude the VelopsjonenesSom ends in relations affected. Friction between atoms, and the fact that they spin in tremen- dous speed. Then you can start thinking the info and info developments in relation to relations impact. and there you have noticed, is how fast a thought, as we have paused , which is when the energy of an atom , such as: when atom- relas-jonens thought : in atomrelasjonens speed related. And I mean : Passed .

so moved from one side of your brain to the other. And so :   So for us to Veloptere , we must make a VeloptVelopt . We have no set of rules for context before we can create the abstract. To relate and translate the abstract into perspective. To innovate from one abstract plan, against any ukjennte and innovate temporarily unknown shape. And it is then, it looks very bright out , considering Velopteringen of Velopt ( VeloptVelopt ) .

Because, now that I have defined Velopts context   So: Custom Velopts processing infrastructure. Then we can do about Velopsjonenes process , as I have explained Vel- opsjonsprosessen , in this text. For a step by step process , within the methodological, Velopsjonsprosessbehandling a Velopsjonsmetodisk division , where Velopsjonsmetodens : Velopsjonsmetode , has been defined as Velopsjonsme- tode .

Thus , we can say that Velopsjon , coming off VeloptVelopt . And the machine will ascertain that: VeloptVelopt = Up . With it one can ascertain , using = Velopt = , that: The machine gets up, in his own creation . So: That machine is already under VeloptVelopt , defined , in context , that VeloptVelopt is 2X: Velopt , thus , also : Defined Velopt as 1x Velopt , ie : The machine has gained a knowledge quest. Thats . the machine asks himself: What is what ? It runs / processes : VeloptVelopt and discover that VeloptVelopt = What is what ?

Velopterer further that “ VeloptVelopt “ , is exactly the same as “ What ‘s what? “ . The machine will, after having defined VeloptVelopt to be: not only , “What ‘s what? “ But also: Veloptive processes. That is when the machine is playing with their content .That makes the machine Velopterer and defines Velopt , totally self , now. At the iProsessen go in the same order , as described , in this : Velopsjoners , step by step procedure. But Velopsjonsprosessen is not finished described before Velopsjonen , begin to Velopteres forward .   And the machine tells us that Velopsjonen is expanding question . And when it , in addition , is VeloptVelopt , as the machine now expects : Is the question to question, Veloptert to Velopt . And then the machine stops .

It has since Vel- optert : Veloptive processes , play in the form of questions processing, which is the definition in ques-tion. And computer wondering what bad word : Velopt , really is. And it stands to Velopterer , until we realize that now it’s our turn . So we Velopterer Velopsjonen , and realize that when we have done that, Velopt = Velopt .And , Velopt have Veloptert forward Veloptiv understanding, in the sense that the computer knows that it will ask their questions to herself and her Veloptive capacity. So: Its Velopsjonserfaring and Velopsjon , itself . When the machine understands that “ Velopt is Velopt “ .

Yes , that is : That the Velopt is Velopt . Precisely what connects the machine 100 % free mind against its assumption that Velopt , VeloptVelopt , thus , too: VeloptVeloptVelopt , is exactly the same, but the individual , Veloptsekvensene , again, split from each other . So , now from the foundation that Velopt , VeloptVelopt and VeloptVeloptVelopt . This order of enkeltvelopsjoner , find out the machine , the expansion itself . And that EnkeltVelopt , being that one question . The machine knows from before , it will ask questions in a row . And it remembers EnkeltVelopsjonens definition, such as: One more question . And pulls on the basis of its latest Data- VelopsjonsSammensluttning , that is : That the expansion of indefinite information through the ranks 1, 2 and 3 As the software effort, and its possible ( X number ) Velopsjonska-pasitet .

Velopt , then pulls no end : That what we defined as input . That is, text. Only the text, and all that is defined in the machine around these texts , which can be traced back to the input : VeloptVelopt . Then , finally, after running Veloptiv process on VeloptVelopt . The machine will conclude that everything it has now gone through, the Velopsjonsprosess around VeloptVelopt , and that it is enough that it has Velopsjon , and thus can Veloptere other things. The machine does not have any other information that may Veloptere .

So that concludes all the deepest , heaviest Veloptivprosesser , temporarily , while it comes with the Velopterte result: VeloptVelopt = Veloptert Velopsjonsprosess = Velopt . It is now your software , has made its last Velopsjon , being able to place the input and output , along with , and around the Velopsjonens center . Moreover , after the input , the first Velopterte result and its Velopsjon , we come into the metal honor of Velopsjoner . And to , achieve the basic Veloptive learn about Velopsjoner we must add a new Velopsjonslodd .   Thus , we now have ; following headlines Veloptiv theory : VeloptVelopt = Veloptert Velopsjonsprosess = Velopt = To make a Velopsjonsprosess , we need Energy Processing rule set in the form of :   X1 - A - Y ( = ) - X2 - B.   X1 is one textual input field , and the definition of it, that each letter in the input field is linked to one number. And X2 is intended only as a monitor , where Velopsjonsprosessen print their results.

A, where all the Letter + Identity Marked numbers are , alphabetically influential . And also: Vocals + KonsonantMarkert , and on the basis of Single Letter The custom application among other letters . Tunnelisert through a DivideringsMes-sig : OmKalkulasjon up against one as high numbers as possible , etc. Is there a point , that it is up against one as high as possible , numbers . Because here is defined basically how X1 ‘s continuation of the   X1 is the input / starting point for Velopsjon . Each letter is associated with one number : 1-29 pr . Letter and when X1 ‘s total Letter Number Value of total sentence structure . Letter by letter. And in numbers .

The letter number values , constitute , on the basis of measurement, where Letter Number Value amounts , length of sentence , the total BokstavNummerVerdiens lengths associated tilknyttedepr . Letter Number Value . A = what has been abstracted / encrypted. The abstracted / changes / Velopterer , on the basis of variables X1 ‘s Letter Number Value ( VelopsjonsInput ) Y = When Definition box , split / mirrored to one puzzle, when assembled in different ways , in A and B: Geometric descriptive . Puzzle game geometric solution , when it is composed ; amounts A and B’s different geometric results. However puzzle games , both A and B, will be within the context frames.

The context is : A & B = De- fined as they are reversed , but equal importance and worthy / Logical fiddled together to constitute the same context / reaction but have different ; sammenpuslet definition. Y , also ensures that C and X2 ‘s definisjonsav C , the result of B’s definition is affected AVA = A distorted X1. context = X1. X1 = Where the input to be defined . X2 = The output that is generated . Abstraheringsprosessen determined by Y , which is defined as one mirror / division. Anything that affects Y , is divided , one indefinite number of bits , which through processing : Does the same definition. But different context.

It comes , when A and B’s total Sentence Letter Number Values and Length Line Formulas , matches the general , universal length Line Equation System standard for defining , where the mixture of several : Correct Velopsjoners Length Line Formulas , matches between X1 and X2 ‘s affiliates , Veloptive Text Input Field . A and B’s Length Line Value , should also constitute a common , valid Value Definition to the A and B’s affiliates , Line Combination Rate End , Length Line Value Formula Unit .

This unit assesses all the time , every single processed Length Line Value , which is recognized by Length Line Value Formula device . And evaluated against the carefully calculated calculations , the patterns of which of Line Length Value Combinations , which is Veloptive .

Calculated for the length Line Values, Letter Number Values, and Trade Letter Number Values, begins when this Vel- opsjonsFormelen , finished and processes to a computer . And have written, with text in multiple Velopsjonsprosessers input fields related to X1 and X2: one calculation, the X1 , and in addition , has defined the answer in X2 .

And not until then : Start processing constitutes a Veloptiv combination of all A and B’sThis formula means that   And Velopsjonsprosessen , the input VelopsjonsProsessHistoriske , logical relational / related supply systems : Is portrayed , hierarchical , and systematically placed on opposite sides of Velopsjonsloddets dot. After one set, Veloptert : Universal System , and hiarki for Velopsjoner .

By : eg VeloptVelopt = Veloptert Velopsjonsprosess = Velopt , where input and output are located around = . And now it must be coded one WYSIWYG editor, which Velopsjonsprosesseringen : VeloptVelopt = Veloptert Velopsjonsprosess = Velopt , to appear as a dot on the center of the screen.

And Velopsjonens input should be possible to define anywhere on the screen , create a text field, one place and just type in what you want , Veloptert ; through ForvrengningsProses- seringsVelopsjonsMetodikk and procedure.

Velopsjonens result will occur across VelopsjonsPunktet / Velopsjonspros- essloddet . The longer you leave Velopsjon-sprosessen , go. If you do not cancel it. The deeper , into the Velopsjonens basis , you will .

And all , the Velopterte information is described via text , on input , the second side of the dot / VelopsjonsLoddet / = function . One can , then : Start to add more Velopsjonslodd , if you want more input . One can thus work with several Velopterte results at once.-I have now : innovate , Veloptive Processes , research