APPENDIX B

COLLEGE OF PHARMACYGraduate Assessment Plan

(Master’s program)

1. Program Information:Program Pharmacy M.S. degree

Department Pharmaceutical SciencesCollege College of Pharmacy

Report Submitted by Taifo Mahmud, Director of Pharmacy Graduate Programs

2. Program OutcomesProvide the Graduate Learning Objectives/Outcomes for your M.S. program.

Attachment 1 (“Graduate Learning Objectives/Outcomes…”), below, includes a broad statement of universal graduate learning objectives and outcomes for programs in the sciences. Objectives and outcomes specific to Pharmacy include:

Please see Appendix 1 for learning outcomes/objectives and assessment methods for the Pharmacy M.S. program.

3. Measurement – Provide a detailed narrative or schematic to articulate how all the outcomes will be measured.

a) Describe the methods you will use to assess each outcome.

Appendix 1 lists the means of assessment employed in ensuring attainment of outcomes. In addition we will measure: average undergraduate GPA and GRE scores of admitted students average GPA of graduate students in didactic (non-blanket) courses and overall GPA

We require a minimum of 3.0 in didactic coursework as well as overall Time to completion of the thesis Number of alumni placed in job/career position of choice.

b) Describe and attach any measurement tools to be used (exam results, performance criteria, evaluation/performance rubrics, etc.,)

Appendix 2 is a “Scoring Guide” for the M.S. Thesis Defense. These tools will be used in conjunction with existing metrics as listed above and in Appendix 1.

4. Please provide a skeletal assessment plan (Mapping Guide) for your program:Provide a skeleton plan describing the specific activities and assessment method for each outcome. Map all required courses (with their learning outcomes) and assessments to the program outcomes.

The mapping guide is included as Appendix 3, “Mapping Guide for the M.S. Degree”.

5. Other activities that have informed decision making: Please report on any other activities that you feel fall under assessment that were not captured above. This may include general satisfaction surveys, employer input, or other initiatives that contribute to student learning or program improvement.Appendix 4 is a copy of our annual assessment of M.S. candidatesAppendix 5 is a copy of our annual report of activitiesAdditional assessment activities that are not captured include:Employer feedback on student internships.The availability of internships for interested students to increase their preparedness for the work place.Anecdotal information from newly graduated students on their perception of the overall quality of the program provided to the Graduate Program Director during exit surveys.Formal alumni and current student surveys conducted for the graduate program review.Student evaluation of teaching data for the small number of our students who choose to be a lead instructor for the Phar 210 course as a GTA.

Appendix 1

Graduate Learning Outcomes/Objectives for the M.S. in Pharmacy

OSU required M.S. Learning Outcomes:(a) Conduct research or produce some other form of creative work, and(b) Demonstrate mastery of subject material, and (c) Be able to conduct scholarly or professional activities in an ethical manner.

M.S. Learning Outcomes specific to Pharmacy:I. Be able to expand the knowledge base in pharmaceutical sciencesII. Be able to communicate research findings to improve the knowledge base in pharmaceutical sciences, and

improve drug discovery, drug use and human healthIII. Be able to conduct all scholarly and creative activities in an ethical mannerIV. Be able to successfully enter the profession of pharmaceutical sciences

The following table indicates what we have identified as graduate learning objectives, by which we assess graduate learning outcomes; also for each we include the means of assessment (scoring methods). The objectives address critical areas of competency at various points on the path through graduate studies (admissions, matriculation to candidacy, graduation). Means of assessment referenced in the table below include:(1) minimum admission standards, assessment of application materials, admissions process interviews;(2) meeting a predetermined standard in graduate level coursework (content/subject matter and GPA);(3) written thesis or research paper;(4) oral defense;(5) annual assessment of progress for M.S. candidates (i.e., annual advisor assessment of progress);(6) completion of required ethics course;(7) required annual research presentations at the College of Pharmacy retreat;(8) submission of applications for competitive fellowships (optional).

MS ObjectiveStudents will have met the objectives for learning outcomes in an undergraduate discipline relevant to pharmaceutical sciences.Scoring methods: 1Graduates will be able to summarize major central issues and current research problems in their field.Scoring methods: 2,4,5Graduates will have knowledge of and effectively use modern, innovative methods pertinent to the disciplineScoring methods: 2,3,4,5,6,7Graduates will be able to communicate the major tenets of their field and their work orally and in writing for students and peers.Scoring methods: 2,3,4,7Graduates will display excellent oral and written communication skills and communicate their research findingsScoring methods: 3,4,7Graduates will be able to identify areas where ethical issues may arise in their work or discipline.Scoring methods: 2,5,6Graduates will have demonstrated the capability to conduct all scholarly activities in a safe, responsible and ethical manner and with an understanding of laws and procedures related to patient privacy if applicable.Scoring methods: 3,4,5,6Graduates will have completed and defended:

(1) an original manuscript based on either a review and synthesis of the primary literature [non-thesis (project) MS] or original research [thesis MS]; or

(2) mastery of appropriate advanced coursework in the field. [non-thesis (coursework) MS]Scoring methods: 2,3,4

Appendix 2

M.S. THESIS DEFENSE EXAM in Pharmacy Student Evaluation and Scoring Guide

Candidate Name: _________________________________________________ Date: __________________

Evaluation/GuidanceDoes not

meetExpectations

MeetsExpectations

ExemplaryPerformance

1. Problem Definition: States the research hypothesis clearly2. Background: Demonstrates sound knowledge of the literature and of prior work on the specific research problem3. Impact of Proposed Research: Explains the significance of the research and its value in advancing knowledge within the area of study and significance to improving health4. Approach: Used appropriate research methods/tools to test the hypothesis, and can explain the principles behind the methods and limitations5. Results: Data was appropriately analyzed and interpreted. Figures were clear, complete and indicated appropriate statistical analysis6. Discussion: The results were connected with prior research in the field in a detailed and scholarly manner7. Quality of Written Communication: The thesis was written clearly and professionally with minimal technical errors8. Quality of Oral Communication: The oral presentation of the thesis was clear and professional, including the quality of any supporting media such as powerpoint slides9. Critical Thinking: Responded thoughtfully, fully and clearly to public questions10. Ethical Aspects: Student provides assurance that all aspects of the thesis research were conducted ethically and demonstrates awareness of the implication of that assurance

Overall Assessment: based on the evidence provided in items 1 – 10 above.

CRITERIAPERFORMANCE RATINGS for M.S. THESIS DEFENSE EXAM

Does NOT PASS Exam PASSES Exam

OVERALL, My rating of this M.S. thesis defense exam is:

Does not meetexpectations

Meetsexpectations

Exemplaryperformance

Examiner/Major Advisor: Please use the reverse side of this form for written commentary. In particular, please provide an explanation for any items scored as “does not meet expectations” or detailed comments if the student does not pass. Please provide a copy of this completed evaluation form to the student and return the original SIGNED version to Debra Peters, 115 Pharmacy.

Appendix 2

M.S. THESIS DEFENSE EXAM in Pharmacy Student Evaluation, Written comments on performance.

Name of the Examining Committee Member/Major Advisor: ___________________________________

Signature of the Examining Committee Member/Major Advisor: ________________________________

Appendix 3

Mapping Guide for the M.S. Degree - Pharmacy

Only the top 5 activities are listed for each outcome. Other activities may also support the outcomes, however data will be collected for those listed in each column

Learning Outcomes:Graduate students in the M.S. program will demonstrate

Outcome 1: Knowledge and Scholarship

Outcome 2: Communication Outcome 3: Ethical Conduct Outcome 4: Professional Development

Activities and Evidence: Identify and conduct original research, scholarship or creative endeavors by applying critical thinking and problem solving

Effectively communicate their field of study

Conduct research in an ethical and responsible manner

Demonstrate attributes of professional development consistent with expectations within their field of study

1. Journal club and regular department seminars

Gain awareness of issues in the responsible conduct of research

Gain appreciation for membership in professional societies; Attend scientific seminars across campus; Gain exposure to multiple career paths

2.Annual retreat presentations

Develop good oral presentations skills with practice on a yearly basis before a professional audience

Participate in a graduate research competition; Meet a speaker or national or international reknown in the field

3. Plan of Study Coursework

Gain knowledge needed for conducting original research. Critically analyze ideas and data presented in upper level courses.

Complete required class in the responsible conduct of research

Develop a vocabulary to communicate across disciplines in the required Phar 735 class and in journal club

4. Research credits Complete OSU minimum required research credits. Develop critical thinking and problem solving skills by conducting research.

Complete required training courses relevant to the area of research

Use appropriate methods for research and data analysis including advanced instrumentation, statistical and computer methods

5. Presentation of Research at Appropriate Venues

Answer questions for a professional scientific audience, defending and supporting the research

Present an oral presentation or poster to a professional audience at a scientific gathering

Give oral or poster presentations to audiences including researchers, students and health professionals

6. M.S. Thesis Prepare a thesis that meets expectations for original, independent research and provides a scholarly survey of prior research in the discipline

Write a clear and professional thesis and orally present the research findings in a publically announced defense

Prepare a thesis based on ethical and responsible research

7. Thesis Defense Defend the thesis research before the student’s Advisory Committee. Answer questions in the seminar

Present the research in a seminar and defend the thesis

Present the thesis research in a seminar and defend the thesis research before the student’s Advisory Committee

Appendix 4

Pharmacy M.S. Student Annual Advisor Assessment of ProgressName:Advisor:Date:

Please rate this student on a scale of one to five in comparison with other successful graduate students at this stage of their program. 1=student is not making progress towards this goal, 3= student is progressing adequately and on par with other students at this stage towards this goal, 5= student excels almost all other students at this career stage in meeting this goal. Please use NA if not applicable to this student/project. We expect that most students should be receiving a majority of “3”s. For any score of 2 or below, please develop an action plan with the student for improvement. Please re-visit these areas for improvement with the student in 6 months.

Goal Score

1 Is making progress in attainment of last year’s goals

2 Has applied significant effort toward attainment of last year’s goals

3 Understands and effectively uses modern, innovative methods pertinent to the discipline

4 Displays excellent oral and written communication skills.

5 Completes experiments, or other research tasks, with attention to detail, appropriate use of equipment, methodological approaches, and all appropriate controls

6 Demonstrates intellectual curiosity and creativity

7 Interacts well and works effectively with others

8 Demonstrates appropriate independence in development and execution of thesis project

9 Communicates research findings (e.g., publications, abstracts, presentations, etc.)

10

Displays excellent work habits and attitudes with a high potential to productively enter the research workforce.

11

Ethically conducts research in all environments

12

Works safely in all areas with concern for self and others

13

Demonstrates understanding of and protection for privacy concerns when dealing with patient-specific information

Please provide an overall evaluation of the student’s academic and research progress over the past 12 months, and your goals for the student for the coming year, including an action plan for scores of 2 or less in any area*. Please discuss this completed form with your graduate student, comparing the student’s self-evaluation with yours. For students in the 2th year of the M.S. program, please provide an anticipated graduation date and plans for timely degree completion.

I verify that I have discussed this completed evaluation with my advisor

Student signature:_______________________________________ Date:___________

I verify that I have discussed this completed evaluation with my student

Advisor signature:_______________________________________ Date:___________

Please sign and date both this form and the graduate student’s self-evaluation form. Retain copies of both for yourself and send the completed originals to Debra Peters.

*Advisors are encouraged to consult with the student’s thesis committee and subsequently the Graduate Studies committee, if needed, regarding recurrent inadequate progress on action plans in deficient areas.

Appendix 5

Annual review of College of Pharmacy Graduate Students

Name: Degree being sought? MS PhD

Department or Degree Program: Thesis advisor:

Year of entry into the program: Anticipated date of degree completion:

Date of last thesis committee meeting:If no meeting has yet convened, please list anticipated date of first meeting:

Oral prelims completed? Yes No

If No, please list anticipated date of oral prelim exam:

Dates (years) in which you gave an oral presentation at College of Pharmacy Graduate Student retreat:

Please list all fellowships/scholarships applied for in the past year:

Please list all fellowships/scholarships received in the past year, including funding agency, amount award, and date(s) of awards:

Please list all manuscripts published in the previous year:

Please list any awards received in the previous year, including local, regional or national poster awards or other:

Please list attendance at any regional or national meetings to present either oral or poster form research findings:

COLLEGE OF PHARMACYGraduate Assessment Plan

(Doctoral program)

3. Program Information:Program Pharmacy PhD degree

Department Pharmaceutical SciencesCollege College of Pharmacy

Report Submitted by Taifo Mahmud, Director of Pharmacy Graduate Programs

4. Program OutcomesProvide the Graduate Learning Objectives/Outcomes for your PhD program.

Please see Appendix 1 for learning outcomes/objectives and assessment methods for the Pharmacy PhD program

3. Measurement – Provide a detailed narrative or schematic to articulate how all the outcomes will be measured.

a) Describe the methods you will use to assess each outcome.

Appendix 1 lists the means of assessment employed in ensuring attainment of outcomes. In addition we will measure: average undergraduate GPA and GRE scores of admitted students average GPA of graduate students in didactic (non-blanket) courses and overall GPA

(We require a minimum of 3.0 in didactic coursework as well as overall) Pass/fail rate for the preliminary exam Performance on a scale of 1 to 3 on the prelim and thesis exams using the established rubrics Average time to completion of the thesis Number of student peer-reviewed publications, presentations at regional or larger scientific

meetings, awards/honors/fellowships obtained during the graduate program Performance on the prelim and thesis exams using the established rubrics Number of alumni placed in job/career positions of choice.

b) Describe and attach any measurement tools to be used (exam results, performance criteria, evaluation/performance rubrics, etc.,)

Appendix 2 is a “Scoring Guide (Rubric)” for the Ph.D. Preliminary Exam; Appendix 3 is a “Scoring Guide” for the Ph.D. Thesis Defense. These tools will be used in conjunction with existing metrics as listed above and in Appendix 1.

4. Please provide a skeletal assessment plan (Mapping Guide) for your program:Provide a skeleton plan describing the specific activities and assessment method for each outcome. Map all required courses (with their learning outcomes) and assessments to the program outcomes.

The mapping guide is included as Appendix 4, “Mapping Guide for the Ph.D. Degree”.

5. Other activities that have informed decision making: Please report on any other activities that you feel fall under assessment that were not captured above. This may include general satisfaction surveys, employer input, or other initiatives that contribute to student learning or program improvement.Appendix 5 is a copy of our annual assessment of PhD candidates (post-prelim students)Appendix 6 is a copy of our annual report of activitiesAdditional assessment activities that are not captured include:Employer feedback on student internships.The availability of internships for interested students to increase their preparedness for the work place.Anecdotal information from newly graduated students on their perception of the overall quality of the program provided to the Graduate Program Director during exit surveys.Formal alumni and current student surveys conducted for the graduate program review.Student evaluation of teaching data for the small number of our students who choose to be a lead instructor for the Phar 210 course as a GTA.

Appendix 1

Graduate Learning Outcomes/Objectives for the PhD in PharmacyOSU required PhD Learning Outcomes:

(a) produce and defend an original significant contribution to knowledge; (b) demonstrate mastery of subject material; and (c) be able to conduct scholarly activities in an ethical manner.

PhD Learning Outcomes specific to Pharmacy:V. Be able to expand the knowledge base in pharmaceutical sciencesVI. Be able to communicate research findings to improve the knowledge base in pharmaceutical sciences, drug

discovery, drug use and human healthVII. Be able to teach and mentor future pharmaceutical science scientists VIII. Be able to conduct all scholarly and creative activities in an ethical mannerIX. Be able to successfully enter the profession of pharmaceutical sciences

The following table indicates what we have identified as graduate learning objectives, by which we assess graduate learning outcomes; also for each we include the means of assessment (scoring methods). The objectives address critical areas of competency at various points on the path through graduate studies (admissions, matriculation to candidacy, graduation).

Means of assessment referenced in the table below include:(9) minimum admission standards, assessment of application materials, admissions process interviews;(10) meeting a predetermined standard in graduate level coursework (content/subject matter and GPA);(11) a pass/fail preliminary exam;(12) written thesis or research paper;(13) oral defense;(14) annual assessment of progress for doctoral candidates (i.e., post-prelim exam);(15) completion of required ethics course;(16) required annual research presentations at the College of Pharmacy retreat;(17) required research presentation at a regional or national meeting;(18) submission of applications for competitive fellowships.

Ph.D. ObjectiveStudents will have met the objectives for learning outcomes in an undergraduate discipline relevant to pharmaceutical sciences.Scoring methods: 1Graduates will possess a broad knowledge base of the discipline and deep knowledge of a subdiscipline within medicinal chemistry, pharmacology, or pharmaceuticsScoring methods: 2,3,4,5Graduates will have knowledge of and effectively use modern, innovative methods pertinent to the disciplineScoring methods: 2,3,4,5,6Graduates will perform research with attention to detail and appropriate use of equipment, methodology, and controls, and solve problems with creativity, critical thinking skills, understanding of methods, and facility with techniquesScoring methods: 4,5,6,8,9Graduates will display excellent oral and written communication skills and communicate their research findingsScoring methods: 3,4,5,7,8,9,10Graduates will be able to teach and mentor other researchers.Scoring methods: 6,7,8,9Graduates will have demonstrated the capability to conduct all scholarly activities in a safe, responsible and ethical manner and with an understanding of laws and procedures related to patient privacy if applicable.Scoring methods: 3,4,5,6,7Graduates will have designed, carried out and presented an original work of research at the leading edge of their discipline.

Scoring methods: 2,4,5,9Graduates will have demonstrated the ability to write a competitive application for research fundingScoring methods: 3,10Graduates will have displayed good work habits, the ability to work well with others and the ability to independently develop and execute a research projectScoring methods: 4,6,9Graduates will have had the opportunity to interact with other pharmaceutical scientists outside of OSUScoring methods: 8,9

Appendix 2

Ph.D. PRELIMINARY EXAM in Pharmacy Student Evaluation and Scoring Guide

Candidate Name: _________________________________________________ Date: __________________

Evaluation/GuidanceDoes not

meetExpectations

MeetsExpectations

ExemplaryPerformance

1. Problem Definition: States the research hypothesis clearly and understands the gap in knowledge2. Background: Demonstrates sound knowledge of literature in the research area, and of prior work on the specific research problem3. Impact of Proposed Research: Demonstrates the potential value of the proposed research problem in advancing knowledge within the area of study and significance to improving health4. Approach: Provides a sound plan for applying state of- the-art research methods/tools to testing the hypothesis, shows a good understanding of how to use methods/tools effectively, describes the limitations of the methods and provides appropriate alternatives5. Expected Results: Provides a sound plan for analyzing and interpreting research results/data, including appropriate use of statistics6. Timeline: Has developed an appropriate timeline for completion of the proposal given the Approach7. Quality of Written Communication: Communicates research proposal clearly and professionally in written form8. Quality of Oral Communication: Communicates research proposal clearly and professionally in oral form9. Critical Thinking: Demonstrates capacity for critical thinking and problem solvent relevant to the capability to conduct independent research in the area of study10. Broader Impact: Demonstrates awareness of broader implications of the proposed research. Broader implications may include social, economic, technical, ethical, business, etc. aspects.11. Ethical Aspects: Demonstrates awareness of ethical aspects of the proposed research and tenets of responsible conduct of research in general12.Subject Area Mastery: Demonstrates mastery of the subject areas encompassed by one of the sub-disciplines of pharmaceutical sciences, i.e., pharmacology, medicinal chemistry or pharmaceutics

Overall Assessment: based on the evidence provided in items 1 – 12 above.

CRITERIAPERFORMANCE RATINGS for PRELIMINARY EXAM

Does NOT PASS Exam PASSES Exam

OVERALL, My rating of this preliminary exam is:

Does not meetexpectations

Meetsexpectations

Exemplaryperformance

Examiner/Major Advisor: Please use the reverse side of this form for written commentary. In particular, please provide an explanation for any items scored as “does not meet expectations” or detailed comments if

the student does not pass. Please provide a copy of this completed evaluation form to the student and return the original SIGNED version to Debra Peters, 115 Pharmacy.Ph.D. PRELIMINARY EXAM in Pharmacy Student Evaluation, Written comments on performance.

Name of the Examining Committee Member/Major Advisor: ___________________________________

Signature of the Examining Committee Member/Major Advisor: ________________________________

Appendix 3

Ph.D. THESIS DEFENSE EXAM in Pharmacy Student Evaluation and Scoring Guide

Candidate Name: _________________________________________________ Date: __________________

Evaluation/GuidanceDoes not

meetExpectations

MeetsExpectations

ExemplaryPerformance

1. Problem Definition: States the research hypothesis clearly and understands the gap in the knowledge.2. Background: Demonstrates sound knowledge of the literature and of prior work on the specific research problem3. Impact of Proposed Research: Explains the significance of the research and its value in advancing knowledge within the area of study and significance to improving health4. Approach: Used appropriate and state of- the-art research methods/tools to test the hypothesis, and can explain the principles behind the methods and limitations5. Results: Data was appropriately analyzed and interpreted. Figures were clear, complete and indicated appropriate statistical analysis6. Discussion: The results were connected with prior research in the field in a detailed and scholarly manner7. Quality of Written Communication: The thesis was written clearly and professionally with minimal technical errors8. Quality of Oral Communication: The oral presentation of the thesis was clear and professional, including the quality of any supporting media such as powerpoint slides9. Critical Thinking: Responded thoughtfully, fully and clearly to public questions10. Ethical Aspects: Student provides assurance that all aspects of the thesis research were conducted ethically and demonstrates awareness of the implication of that assurance11.Publications: At least one peer-reviewed journal article or book chapter has been published or submitted based on this research

Overall Assessment: based on the evidence provided in items 1 – 11 above.

CRITERIAPERFORMANCE RATINGS for Ph.D. THESIS DEFENSE EXAM

Does NOT PASS Exam PASSES Exam

OVERALL, My rating of this Ph.D. thesis defense exam is:

Does not meetexpectations

Meetsexpectations

Exemplaryperformance

Examiner/Major Advisor: Please use the reverse side of this form for written commentary. In particular, please provide an explanation for any items scored as “does not meet expectations” or detailed comments if the student does not pass. Please provide a copy of this completed evaluation form to the student and return the original SIGNED version to Debra Peters, 115 Pharmacy.

Ph.D. THESIS DEFENSE EXAM in Pharmacy Student Evaluation, Written comments on performance.

Name of the Examining Committee Member/Major Advisor: ___________________________________

Signature of the Examining Committee Member/Major Advisor: ________________________________

Appendix 4

Mapping Guide for the Ph.D. Degree - Pharmacy

Only the top 5 activities are listed for each outcome. Other activities may also support the outcomes, however data will be collected for those listed in each column

Learning Outcomes:Graduate students in the PhD program will demonstrate

Outcome 1: Knowledge and Scholarship

Outcome 2: Communication

Outcome 3:Teach and Mentor

Outcome 4: Ethical Conduct

Outcome 5: Professional Development

Activities and Evidence: Identify and conduct original research, scholarship or creative endeavors by applying critical thinking and problem solving

Effectively communicate their field of study

Mentor or teach others in the field

Conduct research inethical and responsible manner

Demonstrate attributes of professional development consistent with expectations within their field of study

1. Journal club and regular department seminars

Present/teach current research findings and/or methods to peers

Gain awareness of issues in the responsible conduct of research

Gain appreciation for membership in professional societies; Attend scientific seminars across campus; Organize a departmental seminar with an invited speaker; Gain exposure to multiple career paths

2.Annual retreat presentations

Develop good oral presentations skills with practice on a yearly basis before a professional audience

Present research finds to peers, undergraduates, professionals, others

Participate in a graduate research competition; Meet a speaker or national or international reknown in the field

3. Plan of Study Coursework

Gain knowledge needed for conducting original research. Critically analyze ideas and data presented in upper level courses.

Experience a compelling learning environment with inclusion of smaller classes with significant discussion components

Complete required class in the responsible conduct of research

Develop a vocabulary to communicate across disciplines in the required Phar 735 class and in journal club

4. Research credits Complete OSU minimum required research credits. Develop critical thinking and problem solving skills by conducting research over several years.

Mentor undergraduates, visiting scientists, professionals or junior graduate students in the lab

Complete required training courses relevant to the area of research

Develop and use appropriate, state-of-the -art methods for research and data analysis including advanced instrumentation, statistical and computer methods

6. Written and Oral Preliminary Exam

Demonstrate sufficient knowledge of subject matter to become a PhD candidate

Demonstrate ability to communicate knowledge and research through a written and oral preliminary examWrite and defend an original proposal

Demonstrate an understanding of the responsible conduct of research

Generate an NIH-style fellowship proposal in practice for future submissions

7. Publish Research in Appropriate Outlets

Submit manuscripts for publication in the peer-reviewed literature

Prepare a manuscript based on ethical and responsible research.

Publish or submit research for publication in peer-reviewed outlets

8. Presentation of Research at Appropriate Venues

Answer questions for a professional scientific audience, defending and supporting the research

Present an oral presentation or poster to a professional audience at a regional or national scientific gathering.

Give several oral and poster presentations to audiences including researchers, students and health professionals

9. Preparation of Ph.D. Dissertation

Prepare a dissertation that meets expectations for original, independent research and provides a scholarly survey of prior research in the discipline

Write a clear and professional dissertation and orally present the research findings in a publically announced defense

Prepare a dissertation based on ethical and responsible research.

10. Dissertation Defense

Defend the dissertation research before the student’s Advisory Committee. Answer questions in the public seminar

Present the research in a public seminar and defend the dissertation

Present the dissertation research in a public seminar and defend the dissertation research before the student’s Advisory Committee

Appendix 5

Pharmacy PhD Student Annual Advisor Assessment of ProgressName:Advisor:Date:

Please rate this student on a scale of one to five in comparison with other successful graduate students at this stage of their program. 1=student is not making progress towards this goal, 3= student is progressing adequately and on par with other students at this stage towards this goal, 5= student excels almost all other students at this career stage in meeting this goal. Please use NA if not applicable to this student/project. We expect that most students should be receiving a majority of “3”s. For any score of 2 or below, please develop an action plan with the student for improvement. Please re-visit these areas for improvement with the student in 6 months.

Goal Score

1 Is making progress in attainment of last year’s goals

2 Has applied significant effort toward attainment of last year’s goals

3 Understands and effectively uses modern, innovative methods pertinent to the discipline

4 Displays excellent oral and written communication skills.

5 Completes experiments, or other research tasks, with attention to detail, appropriate use of equipment, methodological approaches, and all appropriate controls

6 Demonstrates intellectual curiosity and creativity

7 Interacts well and works effectively with others

8 Demonstrates appropriate independence in development and execution of thesis project

9 Communicates research findings (e.g., publications, abstracts, presentations, etc.)

10

Displays excellent work habits and attitudes with a high potential to productively enter the research workforce.

11

Ethically conducts research in all environments

12

Works safely in all areas with concern for self and others

13

Displays skills to mentor and train future researchers in the discipline

14

Demonstrates understanding of and protection for privacy concerns when dealing with patient-specific information

Please provide an overall evaluation of the student’s academic and research progress over the past 12 months, and your goals for the student for the coming year, including an action plan for scores of 2 or less in any area*. Please discuss this completed form with your graduate student, comparing the student’s self-evaluation with yours. For students in the 4th year of the PhD program, please provide an anticipated graduation date and plans for timely degree completion.

**Advisors are encouraged to consult with the student’s thesis committee and subsequently the Graduate Studies committee, if needed, regarding recurrent inadequate progress on action plans in deficient areas.

I verify that I have discussed this completed evaluation with my advisor

Student signature:_______________________________________ Date:___________

I verify that I have discussed this completed evaluation with my student

Advisor signature:_______________________________________ Date:___________

Please sign and date both this form and the graduate student’s self-evaluation form. Retain copies of both for yourself and send the completed originals to Debra Peters.

Appendix 6

Annual review of College of Pharmacy Graduate Students

Name: Degree being sought? MS PhD

Department or Degree Program: Thesis advisor:

Year of entry into the program: Anticipated date of degree completion:

Date of last thesis committee meeting:If no meeting has yet convened, please list anticipated date of first meeting:

Oral prelims completed? Yes NoIf No, please list anticipated date of oral prelim exam:

Dates (years) in which you gave an oral presentation at College of Pharmacy Graduate Student retreat:

Please list all fellowships/scholarships applied for in the past year:

Please list all fellowships/scholarships received in the past year, including funding agency, amount award, and date(s) of awards:

Please list all manuscripts published in the previous year:

Please list any awards received in the previous year, including local, regional or national poster awards or other:

Please list attendance at any regional or national meetings to present either oral or poster form research findings: