& strategy research dbs monthly usd supreme · irvin seah economist [email protected] ... an...
TRANSCRIPT
Group Research
30
29 June 2018
Economics & Strategy Research
DBS Monthly
USD Supreme
Taimur Baig Chief Economist [email protected]
Irvin Seah Economist [email protected]
Please direct distribution queries to Violet Lee +65 68785281 [email protected]
• Economics: Between trade wars, Fed policy
normalization, and rising tension between the
US and Iran, 2H18 will likely be volatile,
especially in the FX space. Coming at a time
when global growth has been sound, the risk is
investments get postponed, sentiments sour,
and EM contagion drags down global demand.
We assess the risks around our forecast
weighed to the downside as it is hard for us
conjure scenarios under which trade or
geopolitical tensions ease considerably.
• FX: Our long-held counter-consensus view for a
US dollar recovery has materialised. Most
currencies have depreciated considerably in
1H18. In adding one more hike at the FOMC
meeting on June 13th, the Fed affirmed our call
for four hikes this year.
• Rates: Tightening in Asia officially kicked off in
May and was followed through in June. More
is likely to come as Asia central banks come to
terms that the Fed under Powell is more
hawkish than the Fed under Yellen.
• Equities: Asian markets are likely to be
adversely affected by concerns over peaking
growth and strong USD, as well as rising
domestic inflation and interest rates. We are
therefore downgrading Indonesia, the
Philippines, and Thailand to Neutral in our 3Q
Asia equity strategy.
• Credit: Following the correction over the last
quarter, valuations in Asian credit have
improved. However, until we see sentiment
improving and markets showing more
stability, we would position defensively by
keeping tenors short.
Refer to important disclosures at the end of this report.
Monthly 29 June 2018
Page 2
Economics: DXY Supreme
The focus is presently the rapid ongoing escalation in
trade wars, with signs of real damage surfacing with
announcements of postponed or redirected investments.
To be sure, backward looking data still paint a
comfortable picture with respect to global consumption
and trade, but we think the chance of upside surprises to
the forecast have waned considerably.
An all-out trade war, which we define to be 10-25% tariff
on all products that are traded between China and the
US, could shave off ¼% of GDP to both economies’ GDP
outturn this year, while the damage would be far greater
in 2019, with both countries looking at ½% of more
downside. Considering that China grows at 6-7% and the
US at 2-3%, we believe the damage would be greater to
the US than on China.
Why would the US be hurt more, when China exports
much more (goods exports of USD505bn in 2017,
compared to importing USD130bn from the US the same
year)? Two key reasons feature into our rationale—first,
China’s retaliation will most likely extend to beyond
goods to trade in services and to the operation of US
companies on mainland China. Second, the US is pursuing
trade wars on multiple fronts, extending the skirmish
against its ostensible allies like Canada and the EU. In
each skirmish the US targets different economies and
consumers, but the retaliation from each counterpart
falls on the same group of American consumers and
businesses. The reckoning is in the pipeline, in our view.
Beyond trade-related headlines, the steady drumbeat of
Fed policy normalization continues to support the US
dollar and hurt EM funding conditions. Add to this rising
tension between the US and Iran, oil will remain elevated,
adding to the woes of commodity importing economies.
We are therefore concerned that 2H18 will likely remain
volatile, especially in the FX space. Coming at a time when
global growth has been sound, the risk is investments get
postponed, sentiments sour, and EM contagion drags
down global demand. We assess the risks around our
forecast weighed to the downside as it is hard for us to
conjure scenarios under which trade or geopolitical
tensions ease considerably.
For China, trade tensions are compounding a multitude
of domestic challenges, ranging from deleveraging to
money market liquidity. We see the Jun 24 RRR cuts
reflecting that policy priorities have shifted from
“deleveraging” to “risk precautions” and “growth
support”. Our Nowcast framework shows only a mild
slowdown in Q2 (we are tracking 6.7% growth), but there
is a general sense of unease, manifesting in higher
borrowing costs, weaker RMB, and investment
slowdown. We believe China will stand up to the US in
the ongoing trade skirmish, but there should be no
question that there is no positive to this saga; China’s
businesses and consumers will be hurt by higher tariffs
and other trade barriers.
The recent EM risk-off catalysts include: a) undeniably,
broader dollar strength, as the latter’s rate differentials
continue to widen with its other G3 peers; b) worries
after contagion from a weaker Chinese yuan, which is
catching-up with the weakness in the other Asia ex-Japan
peers; c) lingering worries over the length and depth of
the US-China trade dispute. Indonesia and India face
similar headwinds presently. Investors are clearly
sensitive to economies that face twin deficits, which
underscore the need for ample financing support.
Policymakers now face worries over the classic
‘impossible trinity’; which in a crux is the influence of
monetary policy direction on the respective currencies,
and portfolio/ capital flows. While 2017 was a year of
plenty, the tone has reversed this year. Last year’s strong
capital flows have, to some extent, aggravated this year’s
external imbalances, by a) creating complacency on
financing risks; b) a more dominant presence to portfolio
flows, particularly given the bigger concentration of
foreigners in Indonesia’s debt markets.
Besides policy tightening, currency intervention has also
been ongoing, which in turn is tightening domestic
liquidity conditions. Neither India not Indonesia face
major sovereign financing risks, with India not having any
external public bond issuances and Indonesia’s hard
currency sovereign obligations to the private sector
rather modest. Still, with financial discipline under focus,
and both economies being characterised by twin deficits
which will exacerbate if domestic energy prices don’t
follow international prices, the need to re-assert fiscal
discipline has risen as well.
Taimur Baig
Monthly 29 June 2018
Page 3
China
The People’s Bank of China (PBOC) announced on 24
June a 50bp cut in the reserve requirement ratio (RRR)
to be effective on 5 July. The cut will release RMB500bn
in funds for the country’s five large state banks and 12
national joint-stock commercial banks to finance debt-to-
equity swaps. It will also unleash RMB200bn for postal
banks and city commercial lenders to support small
businesses. The move confirms that policy priorities
have shifted from “deleveraging” to “risk precautions”
and “growth support” (see China’s slowing investment
dynamic, 15 May and PBOC to show greater flexibility, 13
June).
The reduction came against a backdrop of fragile data
releases. In May, domestic activities from retail sales to
fixed asset investment either stalled or missed market
expectation.
Meanwhile, the government’s deleveraging campaign
has started to take a toll on the accessibility to funding.
Interest rates have remained persistently high despite
money injections. The yield premium of 5Y AA- rated
bonds over AAA notes has widened 88bps since March to
233bps; the highest level since July 2016. Also, 22
onshore bonds defaulted hitherto.
The squeeze was compounded by seasonal factors.
Banks have hoarded cash for the upcoming quarterly
macro prudential assessment (paying back RMB2.3tn
short-term interbank debt) and to set aside cash for the
tax season in July.
Further RRR cuts are warranted given large refinancing
needs ahead. In 2H18, a total of RMB6.0tn of bonds and
trust will mature. The amount of medium-term lending
facility (MLF) due in the next 12 months will rise to
RMB4.2tn. A RRR cut is more favourable for banks than
to roll over MLF loans because of lower funding costs
(1.62% versus 3.3%).
The ongoing Sino-US trade tussle is threatening the long
term downward structural adjustment of China’s
external balances. On top of the 25% duties on USD50bn
Chinese imports earlier, US President Donald Trump may
levy 10% tariffs on an extra USD200bn worth of Chinese
goods. Beijing takes Trump’s threats seriously. Trump has
been following through on his election promises steadily
e.g. ditching Iran deal and imposing immigration ban.
Assuming the price elasticity of American consumer
demand with respect to Chinese goods is 2, the proposed
tariffs would reduce Chinese exports by USD65 billion.
Reportedly, some White House officials have been
seeking to restart negotiations with Beijing. China seems
willing to increase its purchase of American goods. During
the recent round of discussions, Beijing offered to buy
USD70bn of energy, agricultural and manufactured
products from the US.
The current account surplus is all set to fall by a
significant amount (it stood at USD165bn last year,
equivalent to 1.3% of GDP). The consequential reduction
in money supply may prompt further RRR cuts to
supplement the credit creation process.
Nathan Chow
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
May-15 Feb-16 Nov-16 Aug-17 May-18
% YOY
FAI (YTD)
Industrial production
Retail sales
FAI, Industrial production, retail sales
3.70
3.75
3.80
3.85
3.90
3.95
4.00
4.05
4.10
4.15
4.20
-500
-300
-100
100
300
500
700
900
22-Apr-18 22-May-18 21-Jun-18
Funds injected/withdrawn inthe week
1-M SHIBOR (RHS)
Open market operation, SHIBOR
RMB bn %
Monthly 29 June 2018
Page 4
South Korea and Taiwan: Tolerating weaker
currencies
FX volatility in South Korea and Taiwan has risen in the
past week, against the backdrop of a stronger US dollar,
a weaker CNY, and broad-based depreciation in
emerging Asian currencies. The Korean won fell past
1120/USD to an 8-month low on Thursday, while the
Taiwan dollar also slipped past the 30.5/USD mark. Year
to date, the KRW is down 4.8% and the TWD is down
2.6%.
The central banks in South Korea and Taiwan are likely to
tolerate the current bout of FX weakness. The foreign
reserve to short-term external debt ratio remained
strong at 3.3X in South Korea as of 1Q18, and 2.5X in
Taiwan. The current account surplus amounted to USD
78bn in South Korea in 2017 (5.1% of GDP), and USD 83bn
in Taiwan (14.5% of GDP). Given the strong cushions from
foreign reserve and current account positions, the risk of
a vicious cycle of capital outflows and currency
depreciation is relatively low in these two economies.
In fact, the ongoing depreciation of the KRW and TWD
came after the one-way, strong appreciation last year.
The KRW gained 13% vs the USD in 2017, while the TWD
also rose 8%. On the relative basis, the KRW and TWD
were also the outperformers last year – the KRW
appreciated 4% on the NEER basis in 2017 and the TWD
rose 2%. A moderate, orderly correction in their
currencies would be accepted by South Korea’s and
Taiwan’s central banks, given the mounting concerns
over US-China trade tensions and the knock-on effect on
their exports.
We reckon that the central banks in South Korea and
Taiwan will pay more attention to the risk of growth
slowdown than that of capital outflows/financial
instability. Exports and industrial production data in
these two economies have been holding up well as of
May, pointing to steady GDP growth in 2Q. That said,
policymakers would find it necessary to monitor the
upcoming data and assess the impact of US-China trade
disputes. If without successful negotiations, the 25%
tariffs imposed by the US on the first batch of Chinese
exports (USD34bn) would take effect on 6 July. In
addition to the direct impact of higher tariffs on exports,
the prolonged period of trade disputes could also start to
hurt business sentiment and dampen investment plans.
South Korea policy rate forecast (% p.a.)
3Q18 4Q18 1Q19 2Q19 3Q19 4Q19
Old 1.75 2.00 2.00 2.25 2.25 2.25
New 1.50 1.75 1.75 2.00 2.00 2.25
Taiwan’s central bank has turned cautious at the recent
policy meeting on 21 June, emphasising the risk of a 2H
growth slowdown amid external uncertainties (e.g., trade
protectionism, emerging market volatility). Chances are
high that the CBC will keep the accommodative policy
stance at the next meeting in September. We maintain
the forecast for the CBC to hike 12.5bps in December as
a move to normalise monetary policy, while recognise the
possibility of a delay – depending on how the US-China
trade relations will pan out in the coming months.
The external risk factors will also likely keep the Bank of
Korea cautious at the upcoming meeting on 12 July. We
initially expected the BOK to raise rates by 25bps in 3Q
and 4Q, respectively, to preempt inflation. Given that the
trade-war worries have increased and will likely continue
to dominate in the next couple of months, it now seems
that the BOK rate hikes won’t happen so soon. We are
pushing back the call for the two hikes to 4Q18 and 2Q19,
respectively.
Ma Tieying
Monthly 29 June 2018
Page 5
Rates: Tightening follow through
Tightening in Asia officially kicked off in May and was
followed through in June. More is likely to come as Asia
central banks come to terms that the Fed under Powell is
much more hawkish than the Fed under Yellen. It
probably does not help that sentiment for risky assets in
Asia never quite recovered since the first bout of volatility
in February. Between trade wars, higher USD rates and
a stronger USD, the environment remains challenging
for emerging markets.
Respite from Fed hikes is not going to be forthcoming.
The Fed hiked twice this year (March and June) and
signalled another two more to come by the end of 2018.
With the US economy holding up well in absolute and
relative terms (trade tensions notwithstanding), the
hurdle to pause on rate hikes will be high. Moreover, the
European Central Bank (ECB) also stated that asset
purchases are set to end by December. While the ECB’s
tone was dovish, it does not detract from the fact that
policy accommodation is being withdrawn and higher
EUR rates are in store in 2019. Even if trade tensions get
defused, Asia rates still have to adjust to higher
developed market rates.
In June, India and Philippines hiked rates by 25bps each
as the global environment turns much less tolerant of
twin deficits. Indonesia is expected to hike on June 29th.
On balance, these hikes are probably insufficient to
address investor worries with longer-term rates staying
much higher than policy rates. Short term market-based
rates are also elevated amid tight liquidity and increased
speculation of currency weakness. From a valuation
perspective, emerging Asia assets are starting to look
cheap. However, it is probably too early to call for a top
in yields just yet. If USD strength persist, the bias for
interest rates in these economies is to the upside.
Meanwhile, Thailand and Taiwan kept rates on hold. On
balance, we would expect these two economies to be the
laggards (supporting short-term domestic rates) in the
current tightening cycle in Asia. However, some curve
steepening is inevitable if developed market and Asia
rates head north. Price pressures are starting to build in
Thailand and we suspect that a hawkish shift may come
in the coming few meetings. However, the Bank of
Thailand (BoT) is unlikely to match the Fed’s pace in
hiking rates.
If trade tensions worsen, collateral damage would be
felt across Asia (not just China where the tariffs are
targeted). The manufacturing supply chains run across
multiple Asian economies (especially the trade-
dependent ones) and these assets may get re-priced. In
which case, there may be upward pressures on local rates
if the stock market and/or the bond markets sell off to
reflect the deteriorating trade/growth outlook. As such,
events leading up to the tariff implementation on 6 July
bear close watching. Trade tensions is the single biggest
threat to global growth at this point.
Eugene Leow
Monthly 29 June 2018
Page 6
FX: Currency war fears return
Our long-held counter-consensus view for a US dollar
recovery has materialized. Most currencies have
depreciated by the middle of this year. Even the Japanese
yen has returned close to 70% of its gains. Emerging
Asia’s three strongest currencies – the Thai baht, the
Malaysian ringgit and the Chinese yuan – finally gave up
their appreciation this month.
More importantly, our assumptions have been met. In
adding one more hike at the FOMC meeting on June 13th,
the Fed affirmed our call for four hikes this year. With the
Fed Funds Rate set to rise above its 2% inflation target,
Fed has started to roll back its pledge to keep monetary
policy loose indefinitely.
Against a more hawkish Fed, monetary policy
divergences have returned strongly on other major
central banks choosing to stand pat for the rest of the
year. The moderation in Eurozone’s growth led to a
downgrade in its outlook, which in turn, triggered
speculators to pare their excessive long euro positions.
The euro subsequently fell from 1.24 to 1.16 in April-May
and we see it moving lower into 1.10-1.15 on more drag
on the outlook from global trade tensions. Italy’s
populism and Euroscepticism could return to test the
unity and integrity of the single market.
With the DXY Index better positioned to trade in a
higher 95-100 range, we have decided, on June 22nd, to
downgrade our currency outlook. In looking for the euro
to move into a lower 1.10-1.15 range, our end-year target
for the USD against the Singapore dollar was lifted to 1.40
from 1.38. More downward adjustments cannot be
discounted.
This week’s trade war rout in emerging markets have
boosted contagion fears. Vietnam stocks have aborted
its plan to outperform for a second straight year and fell
for the year. The rate hikes in Asia’s three weakest
currencies – the Philippine peso, the Indian rupee and the
Indonesian rupiah – have also yet to arrest their
depreciation. In fact, the rupee has fallen to a new
lifetime low, worse than its Fed taper tantrums levels.
The bitter aftertaste in June was the deterioration in US-
China trade war from a high-stakes poker game of
retaliatory tariffs on each other’s imports into a potential
currency war. Trump’s latest threat to impose tariffs on
an additional USD200bn of Chinese imports into the US
did not lead China (which imported only USD155bn of US
goods in 2017) to fold its cards. Instead, China showed its
hand via the worst monthly fall in the yuan. The 3.2%
depreciation in June trumped the 2.7% fall during the
yuan’s one-off devaluation in August 2015.
Unfortunately, the US has also escalated trade wars with
its other major trading partners such as the Eurozone
and Canada. The odds for trade spats moving on to
negotiations have become low after US President Trump
lashed out at America’s closest allies at the G7 Summit.
Understandably, markets have become less willing to
give Trump the benefit of the doubt on his “on again, off
again” style in fulfilling his campaign pledges ahead of the
US mid-term elections this November. Investors have
become increasingly disillusioned that 2018, unlike 2017,
is not a year of sunshine without rain. Except for its three
weakest currencies, most Asian currencies would
probably await China’s lead in returning some of last
year’s strong appreciation.
Philip Wee
JPY
GBP
EUR
AUD
MYR
VND
THB
CNY
SGD
TWD
KRW
IDR
PHP
INR
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
JPY
GB
P
EUR
AU
D
MYR
VN
D
THB
CN
Y
SGD
TWD
KRW ID
R
PH
P
INR
% YTD change vs USD, as of 28 June
Most currencies have given up this year's gains
Sources: DBS Research, Bloomberg data
IN
TW
VN
SG
HK
KR
MY
TH
ID
CN
PH-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
IN TW VN SG HK KR MY TH ID CN PH
% YTD change in benchmark stock indices
as of 28 June
Contagion fears have found its way into Asian equities
Sources: DBS Research, Bloomberg data
Monthly 29 June 2018
Page 7
Equities: Four downgrades and two upgrades
Asia markets are all likely to be adversely affected by
concerns over peaking growth and strong USD as well as
rising domestic inflation and interest rates. We see
higher interest rates and the risk of further growth
slowdown going into next year. We therefore make a few
cuts, including downgrading the Philippines, Indonesia
and Thailand to Neutral in our 3Q Asia equity strategy.
We are not Underweight in these markets as we believe
domestic liquidity should support these markets as
equity valuations are lower now. Given the high volatility
(greater upside / downside) in these markets and
technical indicators that suggest they are oversold, we
think downside risks are quite limited on a 3-month view.
The risks of contagion could lead to downside risks on the
most resilient markets. We are downgrading India to
Underweight while keeping Taiwan as Underweight. We
think there is a risk that India may be the next market to
fall given that it has been relatively resilient, despite the
fact that its currency has continued to weaken. Its
valuations have not fallen like the other emerging ASEAN
markets, and we believe there is the risk of earnings
being cut. In the near term, a technical rebound for Indian
equities may be out of question. The market remains
sensitive to the interest rate outlook, and we think
further rate hikes are possible given the higher inflation
and weak rupee.
The Taiwan market is less volatile compared to other
Asian countries. Room for upside may be limited as its
growth prospects are not exciting and the market comes
with downside risks, in our view. Apple-related stocks are
sensitive to Apple news and we see it as a main downside
risk for the market. Its longer-term re-rating is unlikely
given Taiwan’s strained political relationship with China.
Korea is a Neutral for us. South Korea’s equity market has
always been one of the cheapest in Asia in terms of
valuations. It trades at a huge discount due to North
Korea, so anything significant that comes out of that
country regarding the peace process could have a major
impact on valuations. Near-term geopolitical risks on the
North Korea peninsular should ease after the US-North
Korea summit. The certainly of peace could help lift South
Korean stocks by pricing in possible ‘peace dividends’,
although the gains may be limited by global conditions. In
addition to geopolitical instability, South Korean
companies have long traded at a discount relative to their
global peers due to concerns over corporate governance
and the lack of transparency. Yet recent reforms
including a stewardship code and measures by “chaebol”
conglomerates to trim cross-shareholdings have helped
boost confidence. We believe there is a favourable risk-
reward ratio from investing in Korean stocks at current
levels.
We are highly selective in our Overweight markets as
there are no safe havens in this environment. We like
China / Hong Kong and Singapore. Domestic policies in
these two countries are flexible and remain growth-
driven. Long-term policies are in place to transform the
economies to being services-oriented, and valuations in
these markets have fallen to attractive levels. Despite
fears of the trade war escalating, we believe China/HK are
relatively safe from further sell off as most companies
derive their earnings from the domestic economy and its
valuation has fallen below average for the first time in the
past 5 years.
We have a non-consensus Overweight in Malaysia. We
believe its fiscal and debt concerns are overblown and
could be demystified once a revised 2018 budget and
2019 budget are out later in the year. Events and
developments in the next two years should be fast
moving to make up for the last five years. Meanwhile, the
equity market has corrected together with the ringgit,
but we think the corrections are in line with emerging
market sell-offs and USD strength. Malaysia holds a
positive current account balance, and is a net oil exporter
in Asia, and its vulnerability should be considered smaller
than other CAD countries. AllianceDBS economist (DBS
Group Research JV partner in Malaysia) recently
upgraded 2018 GDP forecast to 5.6% (+5.4% previously).
Private consumption is expected to expand faster at
9.0%, boosted by the 3-month tax holiday before the re-
introduction of sales and services tax (SST). The
estimated RM17bn being relinquished from the
government’s tax coffers will likely translate into higher
disposable income for consumers, thus allowing them to
consume more. This in turn will spur domestic economic
activity with potential multiplier effects. AllianceDBS also
expects price pressures to remain stable throughout
2018 as a result of the removal of GST and proposed
reintroduction of targeted fuel subsidies, further
boosting consumer confidence.
Monthly 29 June 2018
Page 8
Philippines followed up with another 25bps hike this
month, taking the benchmark repo rate to 3.50%.
However, with the real policy rate still negative (headline
CPI is at 4.6% YoY in May) and market-based interest
rates (bond yields and swaps) still at elevated levels, we
don’t think the adjustment (50bps in the current
tightening cycle) is sufficient just yet. The regional equity
strategy team, however believes that with the BSP now
in control of monetary policies to arrest any peso
weakness and build-up of inflation, the outlook is more
promising than two months ago and the current crisis of
confidence should be transient. Investors can look for
inflation and the current tightening cycle to peak in the
second half amid lower valuations and after foreigner
investors have exited this market. We are downgrading
the market to Neutral and would be more positive as
soon as signs of peaking inflation start to emerge.
By contrast, Thailand’s monetary policy remains in an
easing mode to support growth. 1Q18 GDP growth of
4.8% was the strongest in five years but we are concerned
that the peak is behind us in view of the challenging
global trade environment. A high base, high inventory
build-up and slow private consumption growth in Q1
point to downside risks in the second half. The robust
infrastructure plans, after seeing much delay, could
offset the downside risks. Furthermore, Thailand is
relatively resilient to the current EM risk sell-off given its
strong current account balance. However, a negative
carry should suggest further THB weakness. Politics hold
the key to any rebound in the Thai market, where a clear
poll date could help lift domestic investor sentiments. We
expect the election date to be announced soon. On
balance, we are downgrading the market to Neutral and
not Underweight.
3Q18 Asia market recommendations
Overweight
China/Hong Kong
Singapore
Malaysia
Neutral
Philippines
Indonesia
Thailand
Korea
China ‘A’
Underweight
Taiwan
India
Source: DBS Bank. Notes: Overweight — To hold more
weight than the benchmark weight; Neutral — To hold
the same as the benchmark weight; Underweight — To
hold less weight than the benchmark weight
(see Asia strategy: Safety First, 26 June 2018)
Joanne Goh
Monthly 29 June 2018
Page 9
Credit: Value emerging but not conviction
As we head into the second half of the year, we make the
following observations on the Asian credit market:
• Fundamentals are generally sound: Apart from
pockets of stress (e.g. China LGFVs, lower rated
(mainly single B) issuers), credit fundamentals, in
general, are healthy. At the sovereign level, not just
India, Indonesia and Philippines but even smaller
economies like Vietnam have received positive
rating actions in the last six to nine months. Among
corporates, the investment grade and better quality
sub-investment grade issuers have maintained their
fundamentals. The pick-up in M&A activity, even
among sub-investment grade names, is another
indicator. Apart from Indian banks where the issues
are well known, banking sectors are generally in
good shape. The divergence in fundamentals
between the better quality and weaker issuers is also
reflected in the fact that despite the sell-off we have
seen, there are no “screaming buys” as the higher
quality bonds have generally held up well in price.
Greater dispersion in performance of bonds
based on quality (rating)
Source: Markit, Bloomberg, DBS
• Volatility to remain high: Macro factors (e.g.
geopolitical issues including trade war concerns) and
rising incidents of credit events (especially around
liquidity issues in Asian HY) mean sentiment towards
credits is unlikely to improve meaningfully in the
near term. Policy measures such as the recent NDRC
announcements on restricting 364-day bonds and on
use of proceeds of off-shore bonds by property
developers, while positive in the medium term (due
to more primary market discipline) will also raise
concerns over refinancing and liquidity position of
the weaker credits in the near term. Lastly, volatility
in the rates and EM FX environment will also need to
reduce to bring about some stability in Asian bonds.
• Value has emerged: Following the correction over
the last quarter, valuations in Asian credit have
improved. There are more interesting opportunities
to look at today compared to at the start of the year.
However, until we see sentiment improving and
markets showing more stability, we would position
defensively by keeping tenors short. Selected high
grade bonds (especially in the BBB segment), short-
dated BB bonds, and subordinated bonds of
investment grade issuers (both banks (especially
North Asian) and corporates), are sectors that offer
value, in our view. Specifically, on corporate
subordinated bonds, there has been a significant
repricing as markets re-evaluate call probabilities
based on bond structures and issuer-specific
considerations.
Neel Gopalakrishnan
Monthly 29 June 2018
Page 10
RECENT REPORTS
Focus pieces
• PBOC to show greater flexibility
• China: A long-term “competitiveness” strategy
• China’s next play on the trade saga
Weekly wrap / Flash notes
• Indonesia and India: back on the same boat
• China: Deleveraging taking a back seat
• Weekly: Nowcast Update; FX forecast revision
• HKD Rates: The Hibor overshoot
• Weekly: World Cup, Economies and Markets
• Kim-Trump Summit: no surprises, no disappointment
• PBOC to show greater flexibility
• Weekly: The export cycle has peaked
• India’s RBI committee bites the bullet, hikes policy rate
• Weekly: The case for a less fragile Asia
• India: growth, politics, and policy direction
Monthly 29 June 2018
Page 11
Growth, Inflation, Policy Rates & FX forecasts
GDP growth, % YoY CPI inflation, % YoY, ave
2016 2017 2018f 2019f 2016 2017 2018f 2019f
China 6.7 6.9 6.6 6.2 2.0 1.6 2.1 2.2Hong Kong 2.0 3.8 3.3 2.9 2.4 1.7 2.0 2.5India* 8.0 7.1 6.7 7.2 4.9 4.5 3.6 4.7Indonesia 5.0 5.1 5.3 5.4 3.5 3.8 4.0 4.5Malaysia 4.2 5.9 5.0 5.0 2.1 3.9 2.6 3.0Philippines** 6.9 6.7 6.7 6.7 1.3 2.9 4.2 3.5Singapore 2.0 3.6 3.0 2.7 -0.5 0.6 1.0 1.8South Korea 2.9 3.1 2.9 2.9 1.0 1.9 1.8 1.8Taiwan 1.4 2.9 2.8 2.4 1.4 0.6 1.3 1.0Thailand 3.2 3.9 4.0 4.0 0.2 0.7 1.5 1.5Vietnam 6.2 6.8 6.4 6.6 2.7 3.5 3.6 3.8
Eurozone 1.8 2.5 2.2 2.2 0.2 1.5 1.4 1.4Japan 0.9 1.7 1.1 0.9 -0.1 0.5 0.8 1.0United States*** 1.5 2.3 2.6 2.5 1.3 2.1 1.8 1.8* refers to year ending March ** new CPI series *** eop for CPI inflation
1Q18 2Q18 3Q18 4Q18 1Q19 2Q19 3Q19 4Q19
China* 4.35 4.35 4.35 4.35 4.35 4.35 4.35 4.35India 6.00 6.25 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50Indonesia 4.25 4.75 4.75 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00Malaysia 3.25 3.25 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50Philippines 3.00 3.25 3.50 3.50 3.75 4.00 4.00 4.00Singapore** 1.40 1.65 1.90 2.15 2.15 2.40 2.40 2.65South Korea 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.75 1.75 2.00 2.00 2.25Taiwan 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.50 1.50 1.63 1.63 1.75Thailand 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50Vietnam*** 6.25 6.25 6.25 6.25 6.50 6.50 6.75 6.75
Eurozone 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Japan -0.10 -0.10 -0.10 -0.10 -0.10 -0.10 -0.10 -0.10United States 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50 2.75 3.00 3.25 3.50* 1-yr lending rate; ** 3M SOR ; *** prime rate
Policy interest rates, eop
Q1 18 Q2 18 Q3 18 Q4 18 Q1 19 Q2 19 Q3 19 Q4 19
China 6.28 6.50 6.60 6.70 6.65 6.60 6.55 6.50Hong Kong 7.85 7.84 7.84 7.83 7.82 7.82 7.81 7.80India 65.2 68.0 69.0 69.5 70.0 70.5 71.0 71.5Indonesia 13728 14100 14150 14200 14250 14300 14350 14400Malaysia 3.86 4.00 4.10 4.20 4.18 4.15 4.13 4.10Philippines 52.2 53.0 53.5 54.0 54.5 55.0 55.5 56.0Singapore 1.31 1.36 1.38 1.40 1.39 1.38 1.37 1.36South Korea 1064 1100 1150 1200 1180 1160 1140 1120Thailand 31.2 33.0 33.4 34.0 33.8 33.5 33.3 33.0Vietnam 22775 22865 22903 22970 23022 23074 23246 23177
Australia 0.77 0.74 0.73 0.72 0.73 0.74 0.75 0.76Eurozone 1.23 1.16 1.14 1.12 1.13 1.14 1.15 1.16Japan 106 110 113 115 114 113 112 111United Kingdom 1.40 1.33 1.30 1.28 1.29 1.30 1.31 1.32Australia, Eurozone and United Kingdom are direct quotes
Exchange rates, eop
Monthly 29 June 2018
Page 12
Rates forecasts
2018 2019
Q1a Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
US 3m Libor 2.31 2.30 2.50 2.75 3.00 3.25 3.50 3.75
2Y 2.27 2.60 2.75 2.90 3.05 3.20 3.35 3.50
10Y 2.74 3.00 3.10 3.20 3.30 3.40 3.50 3.50
10Y-2Y 47 40 35 30 25 20 15 0
Japan 3m Tibor 0.07 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
2Y -0.13 -0.12 -0.11 -0.10 -0.08 -0.05 -0.03 0.00
10Y 0.05 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10
10Y-2Y 18 21 21 20 18 15 13 10
Eurozone 3m Euribor -0.33 -0.30 -0.30 -0.25 -0.20 -0.10 0.00 0.10
2Y -0.60 -0.30 -0.20 -0.10 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30
10Y 0.50 0.80 0.90 1.00 1.13 1.25 1.38 1.50
10Y-2Y 110 110 110 110 113 115 118 120
Indonesia 3m Jibor 5.36 7.20 7.00 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75
2Y 5.51 6.70 6.85 7.10 7.20 7.30 7.40 7.50
10Y 6.68 7.15 7.25 7.40 7.55 7.70 7.85 8.00
10Y-2Y 117 45 40 30 35 40 45 50
Malaysia 3m Klibor 3.69 3.65 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90
3Y 3.45 3.70 3.80 3.85 3.85 3.85 3.85 3.85
10Y 3.94 4.20 4.25 4.30 4.35 4.40 4.45 4.50
10Y-3Y 50 50 45 45 50 55 60 65
Philippines 3m PHP ref rate 4.08 4.05 4.20 4.20 4.25 4.30 4.30 4.30
2Y 4.16 4.60 4.80 4.90 5.00 5.10 5.20 5.20
10Y 6.00 6.60 6.70 6.80 6.90 7.00 7.00 7.00
10Y-2Y 184 200 190 190 190 190 180 180
Singapore 3m Sibor 1.45 1.70 1.85 2.05 2.25 2.45 2.65 2.85
2Y 1.79 2.00 2.10 2.20 2.30 2.40 2.50 2.60
10Y 2.29 2.50 2.60 2.70 2.80 2.85 2.90 2.90
10Y-2Y 50 50 50 50 50 45 40 30
Thailand 3m Bibor 1.57 1.60 1.60 1.60 1.85 2.10 2.35 2.60
2Y 1.32 1.45 1.50 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20 2.40
10Y 2.40 2.50 2.60 2.70 2.80 2.90 3.00 3.00
10Y-2Y 107 -95 110 110 100 90 80 60
China 1 yr Lending rate 4.35 4.35 4.35 4.35 4.35 4.35 4.35 4.35
3Y 3.56 3.20 3.20 3.30 3.40 3.50 3.60 3.70
10Y 3.75 3.60 3.65 3.70 3.75 3.80 3.85 3.90
10Y-3Y 19 40 45 40 35 30 25 20
Hong Kong 3m Hibor 1.21 2.00 2.20 2.45 2.70 2.95 3.10 3.25
2Y 1.42 2.00 2.20 2.40 2.65 2.90 3.05 3.20
10Y 1.99 2.50 2.65 2.80 2.95 3.10 3.25 3.25
10Y-2Y 57 50 45 40 30 20 20 5
Taiwan 3m Taibor 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.74 0.74 0.81 0.81 0.89
2Y 0.45 0.60 0.60 0.68 0.68 0.75 0.75 0.83
10Y 0.99 1.15 1.25 1.35 1.45 1.55 1.60 1.65
10Y-2Y 54 55 65 68 78 80 85 83
Korea 3m CD 1.65 1.65 1.65 1.90 1.90 2.15 2.15 2.40
3Y 2.22 2.25 2.30 2.35 2.40 2.45 2.45 2.45
10Y 2.62 2.80 2.85 2.90 2.95 3.00 3.05 3.10
10Y-3Y 41 55 55 55 55 55 60 65
India 3m Mibor 7.48 7.00 7.00 7.15 7.15 7.30 7.30 7.30
2Y 6.85 7.25 7.30 7.40 7.50 7.60 7.70 7.80
10Y 7.40 7.70 7.80 7.90 8.00 8.10 8.20 8.30
10Y-2Y 55 45 50 50 50 50 50 50
%, eop, govt bond yield for 2Y and 10Y, spread bps
Monthly 29 June 2018
Page 13
Group Research Economics & Strategy
Taimur Baig
Chief Economist - G3 & Asia
+65 6878-9548 [email protected]
Nathan Chow
Strategist - China & Hong Kong
+852 3668-5693 [email protected]
Joanne Goh
Regional equity strategist
+65 6878-5233 [email protected]
Neel Gopalakrishnan
Credit strategist
+65 6878-2072 [email protected]
Eugene Leow
Rates Strategist - G3 & Asia
+65 6878-2842 [email protected]
Chris Leung
Economist - China & Hong Kong
+852 3668-5694 [email protected]
Ma Tieying
Economist - Japan, South Korea, & Taiwan
+65 6878-2408 [email protected]
Radhika Rao
Economist - Eurozone & India
+65 6878-5282 [email protected]
Irvin Seah
Economist - Singapore, Malaysia, & Vietnam
+65 6878-6727 [email protected]
Duncan Tan
FX & Rates Strategist - ASEAN
+65 6878-2140 [email protected]
Samuel Tse
Economist - China & Hong Kong
+852 3668-5695 [email protected]
Philip Wee
FX Strategist - G3 & Asia
+65 6878-4033 [email protected]
Disclaimer:
The information herein is published by DBS Bank Ltd (the “Company”). It is based on information obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but the Company does not make any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to its accuracy, completeness, timeliness or correctness for any particular purpose. Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. Any recommendation contained herein does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation & the particular needs of any specific addressee. The information herein is published for the information of addressees only & is not to be taken in substitution for the exercise of judgement by addressees, who should obtain separate legal or financial advice. The Company, or any of its related companies or any individuals connected with the group accepts no liability for any direct, special, indirect, consequential, incidental damages or any other loss or damages of any kind arising from any use of the information herein (including any error, omission or misstatement herein, negligent or otherwise) or further communication thereof, even if the Company or any other person has been advised of the possibility thereof. The information herein is not to be construed as an offer or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any securities, futures, options or other financial instruments or to provide any investment advice or services. The Company & its associates, their directors, officers and/or employees may have positions or other interests in, & may effect transactions in securities mentioned herein & may also perform or seek to perform broking, investment banking & other banking or financial services for these companies. The information herein is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to law or regulation. Sources for all charts & tables are CEIC & Bloomberg unless otherwise specified. DBS Bank Ltd., 12 Marina Blvd, Marina Bay Financial Center Tower 3, Singapore 018982. Tel: 65-6878-8888. Company Registration No. 196800306E.
Sources: Data for all charts and tables are from CEIC, Bloomberg and DBS Group Research (forecasts and transformations)