share mou process in maryland and baltimore city identify challenges in serving target population...
TRANSCRIPT
Share MOU process in Maryland and Baltimore City
Identify challenges in serving target population in urban area
Identify solutions crafted to address challenges
Demonstrate how MOU/MOU process can be advocacy tool
Identify what Baltimore City group did well and lessons learned
Discuss MOU implementation strategies
FY 2008 approx. 1, 220 * homeless preschool age children
Head Start serves 3,419 children Early Head Start serves 184 children 109 public schools w/ pre-k programs 11 family shelter and transitional
housing programs* 40% of the total number of 0-17 year olds reported in the Dept. of Human Resources,
Annual Report on Homelessness Services in Maryland, Fiscal Year 2008
Identify stakeholders Recruit, recruit, recruit Gather model MOUs
› Head Start staff has contacts w/ other HS› State dept. of ed.
Regular meetings Brainstorm Draft and edit, edit, edit
School system personnel› Homeless education liaison/coordinator› Early childhood› Preschool special ed› Enrollment/Attendance
Head Start Management/Staff Head Start Parents- current/formerly
homeless Homeless service providers
› Shelter/TH providers› Health care providers› City homeless services agency› Dept of Social Services
Advocates for homeless families
THE MAJORITY OF HOMELESS FAMILIES ARE OUTSIDE OF THE SHELTER SYSTEM
PRESCHOOL IS NOT COMPLUSORY EDUCATION
THERE IS NO ONE PLACE TO GO FOR PRESCHOOL SERVICES
JOINTLY CREATE OUTREACH/EDUCATION MATERIALS
CITY SCHOOLS REVISE APPLICATION FORMS TO GATHER INFORMATION ON YOUNGER SIBLINGS
HEAD START SHARES WAIT LIST INFORMATION W/ CITY SCHOOLS
DEPT OF SOCIAL SERVICES PROVIDES LIST OF HOMELESS FAMILIES TO CITY SCHOOLS
RAISED BY PARENTS PUBLIC TRANSIT SYSTEM
INADEQUATE/EXPENSIVE W/ OLDER CHILDREN
DIFFICULT TO GET CHILDREN TO MULTIPLE LOCATIONS BY PUBLIC TRANSIT
NO EASY ANSWERS EXPLORE FOUNDATION FUNDING CREATE MORE PRESCHOOL SLOTS IN
TARGETED HIGH NEED, UNDER-SERVED AREAS TO ALLEVIATE NEED TO TRAVEL
PARENTS CONVEYED EXPERIENCE W/ DIFFICULTY FINDING SLOTS IN HEAD START AND OTHER QUALITY PROGRAMS AS THEY MOVED AROUND CITY
ACCUTE PROBLEM FOR CHLDREN 3 YEARS OLD AND YOUNGER
CHILD LOCATE SERVICE DOES NOT INCLUDE HEAD START
BUILD ON PUBLIC SCHOOL-HEAD START PARTNERSHIP PROGRAMS & EXPLORE CREATION OF MORE 3-YEAR OLD PROGRAMS
CONTACT CHILD LOCATE AND DISCUSS ADDING HEAD START PROGRAMS TO ITS LIST OF CHILD CARE PROGRAMS
EXPLORE JOINT FUNDING AND BUDGET OPPORTUNITIES AT FUTURE COLLABORATION MEETINGS
ALL PHASES OF SP. ED. PROCESS MUST MOVE MORE QUICKLY B/C OF TRANSIENT NATURE OF FAMILIES SERVED
MEETINGS NEED TO TAKE PLACE WHERE IT IS CONVENIENT FOR PARENTS
Revise Child Find referral form to identify children at time of referral who may be experiencing homelessness;
Disseminate Child Find brochures and flyers to shelters;
Identify a designated Child Find process manager for children not yet enrolled in City Schools who are experiencing homelessness;
Good faith effort by City Schools IEP teams to expedite the IEP process; and
Train designated shelter staff to screen and identify children who may need referral to Child Find for special education services.
What went well: Child and family
centered Looked forward,
sought solutions Willing to take more
time Reasonable
expectations- MOU puts structure in place for regular meetings where stakeholders discuss critical issues and can take action
Areas for improvement: Gather all
stakeholders in beginning of process