© pharmaceutical consultancy services, all rights reserved. inspectionmethods

17
© Pharmaceutical Consultancy Services, All rights reserved. INSPECTION METHODS

Upload: molly-smith

Post on 04-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: © Pharmaceutical Consultancy Services, All rights reserved. INSPECTIONMETHODS

© Pharmaceutical Consultancy Services, All rights reserved.

INSPECTION METHODS

Page 2: © Pharmaceutical Consultancy Services, All rights reserved. INSPECTIONMETHODS

© Pharmaceutical Consultancy Services, All rights reserved. 2

• TRACE FORWARD • TRACE BACK • PRODUCT SPECIFIC • DEVIATION / COMPLAINT-BASED• PRODUCT LICENCE (Market Authorisation) • DOCUMENT TRAIL • THE CHECKLIST AUDIT • RANDOM

INSPECTION: METHODS

Page 3: © Pharmaceutical Consultancy Services, All rights reserved. INSPECTIONMETHODS

© Pharmaceutical Consultancy Services, All rights reserved. 3

WAREHOUSE DISPENSARY PRODUCTION QUALITY CONTROL FINISHEDGOODS

sampling utilities GCLP

vendors calibration documentation validation

+• favoured method• easy to plan• logical• easy for auditee

TRACE FORWARD AUDIT

-• becomes routine• miss the unexpected

Page 4: © Pharmaceutical Consultancy Services, All rights reserved. INSPECTIONMETHODS

© Pharmaceutical Consultancy Services, All rights reserved. 4

INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT

• Materials• Documentation

• Personnel

The Trace Forward logic applied to a single unit operation

• SOP xxx• Cleaning dispensary

• Completed logbook

TRACE FORWARD

Page 5: © Pharmaceutical Consultancy Services, All rights reserved. INSPECTIONMETHODS

© Pharmaceutical Consultancy Services, All rights reserved. 5

• Essentially the reverse of trace forward

+• Easy to plan• Logical• Can be used to vary approach

-• No major disadvantages

TRACE BACK AUDIT

Page 6: © Pharmaceutical Consultancy Services, All rights reserved. INSPECTIONMETHODS

© Pharmaceutical Consultancy Services, All rights reserved. 6

QC TESTING

LABELLING SOLUTIONPREPARATION

STERILISATION

PREPARATION OF INGREDIENTS

FILLING

+• highly specific

• logical• detailed

PRODUCT-SPECIFIC AUDIT

-• time consuming

• not everything noted• confined to specific

• product

Page 7: © Pharmaceutical Consultancy Services, All rights reserved. INSPECTIONMETHODS

© Pharmaceutical Consultancy Services, All rights reserved. 7

COMPLAINT /DEVIATIONSFILE 2014

PARTICLES

MISSING LABEL

PACKAGING PROBLEMS

MISSING TABLETS

LEAKING CONTAINERS

+• Learn from mistakes• Allows improvement

-• Specific• Considers small part of operation• No value as compliance audit

COMPLAINT / DEVIATION-BASED AUDIT

Page 8: © Pharmaceutical Consultancy Services, All rights reserved. INSPECTIONMETHODS

© Pharmaceutical Consultancy Services, All rights reserved. 8

• Can be extended to internal as well as external complaints, e.g.– Deviations/failure investigations– OOS investigations– CAPA programme

HIGH CALORIE DIET FOR AUDITORS!

COMPLAINT AUDIT

Page 9: © Pharmaceutical Consultancy Services, All rights reserved. INSPECTIONMETHODS

© Pharmaceutical Consultancy Services, All rights reserved. 9

MARKET AUTHORISATION

No. 544321

IN PROCESS TESTS

END TESTS

RAW MATERIALS

PRODUCTION METHOD

EQUIPMENT

+• Compliance• Clear requirements• Easy to perform

- • No real disadvantages

DOCUMENTATION

LICENCE AUDIT

Page 10: © Pharmaceutical Consultancy Services, All rights reserved. INSPECTIONMETHODS

© Pharmaceutical Consultancy Services, All rights reserved. 10

• Can be used for external audits, e.g.– Supply level agreements with suppliers– Service level agreements with contractors– Quality agreements– contracts

Any officially / legally binding document provides starting point for audit

CONTRACT BASED AUDIT

Page 11: © Pharmaceutical Consultancy Services, All rights reserved. INSPECTIONMETHODS

© Pharmaceutical Consultancy Services, All rights reserved. 11

• CRITERIA CHECKLIST (e.g. EU GMPs, CFRs etc.) • DEPARTMENTAL CHECKLIST• COMPANY-SPECIFIC

+ •Easy to use •Avoids missing issues •Good for inexperienced auditors•Easier for auditee•Allows quantification;GMP rating system

-•Restrictive for experienced auditors•Reduces complex issues to YES or NO•Reflects preconceived ideas•Focus of audit is more on checklist, rather than operators•Allows quantification; GMP rating system

THE CHECKLIST AUDIT

Page 12: © Pharmaceutical Consultancy Services, All rights reserved. INSPECTIONMETHODS

© Pharmaceutical Consultancy Services, All rights reserved. 12

Test records

ValidationStudies

Batch records

SOPs

Logbooks

Training records

PPM records

ALL BATCH - SPECIFIC+• Good insight into QS• Easy to perform• Specific

-• Difficult for auditee• No plant tour• Focuses on human error

DOCUMENTATION AUDIT

Page 13: © Pharmaceutical Consultancy Services, All rights reserved. INSPECTIONMETHODS

© Pharmaceutical Consultancy Services, All rights reserved. 13

ORGANISATION

SYSTEM 1 SYSTEM 2 SYSTEM 3

TRACE FORWARD

DOCUMENTS FORSPECIFIC ISSUES

COMPLAINTSDOCUMENTS FORSPECIFIC ISSUES

COMPLIANCE

TYPICAL AUDIT STRUCTURE

Page 14: © Pharmaceutical Consultancy Services, All rights reserved. INSPECTIONMETHODS

© Pharmaceutical Consultancy Services, All rights reserved. 14

ANNOUNCED VS UNANNOUNCED AUDITS

Announced Unannounced

• Right people present• Allows auditee to plan• Allows “clean up”• Shows trust• Length can be set in advance• Cooperative

• Possible key people absent• No time for planning• “As is” situation• Demonstrates suspicion• Unpredictable• Adversarial

Page 15: © Pharmaceutical Consultancy Services, All rights reserved. INSPECTIONMETHODS

© Pharmaceutical Consultancy Services, All rights reserved. 15

INSPECTION DEPTH

ABSENCE

ADHERENCE

ADEQUACY

• Fast• Easy• Indisputable

• Slower• Compliance check

• Complex• Slow• Expertise required• Much discussion/opinion

Audit Depth

Audit Progress

Page 16: © Pharmaceutical Consultancy Services, All rights reserved. INSPECTIONMETHODS

© Pharmaceutical Consultancy Services, All rights reserved. 16

REMARKS

• Any inspector does have it’s own interest (background) and strong/weak points

• Any inspector/inspection might use one of the approaches discussed and “skip” as a result other approaches.

• You may not consider a situation being “approved by an inspector”, if she/he has made no comments.

• Neither: while one inspector may have no comments, another might give you a critical/major/minor observation/483

Page 17: © Pharmaceutical Consultancy Services, All rights reserved. INSPECTIONMETHODS

© Pharmaceutical Consultancy Services, All rights reserved. 17

THANK YOU FORYOUR ATTENTION