Outline the new NCCP Outline WBC & the NCCP –proposed What we have done to date Where are the next steps Unknowns

Learning Facilitators (LF’s) Master Learning Facilitators (MLF’s) Evaluators Master Evaluators Certified coaches Trained coaches

TRAINED COMPETITON INTRODUCTION COACH

TRAINED COMPETITON INTRODUCTION COACH

CERTIFIED COMPETITON INTRODUCTION COACH

Certification lasts 5 years only Maintenance of certification is based

upon active coaching and professional development

Context 5 years 4 years 3 years

Community Sport 10 Points 8 Points 6 Points

Competition Introduction 20 points 16 Points 12 Points

Competition Intro - Advanced 20 Points 16 Points 12 Points

Competition Development 30 Points 24 Points 18 Points

Minimum Professional Development Credits Required

Activity Points Limitations

Active Coaching

1 pt / season To a max number of points equal to certification years

NCCP Activity 5 pt / module No Max or Min

Re-Evaluation 100% of points No other PD is required

Credit / Point Examples

MED is the cornerstone of the New NCCP Competition Stream

It is required by all coaches regardless of previous level in old-NCCP

Trained = MED Module Certified = MED Module + MED

evaluation

Integration of modules into Competition Introduction – why?

Must take MSM through the Provincial Coaching Association for Competition Development – Replacement of Old Level III Theory

There are certain norms within CAC and what other sports are doing

PSO’s are responsible for: LF’s, evaluators, courses

NSO is responsible for: MLF’s, ME’s development

We are able to adjust and tweak with what fits our sport

Complete development of coach materials for Community Coach, Comp Int, Comp Int Advanced, Comp Dev.

Complete development of LF materials for Comp Int, Comp Int Advanced and Comm Coach

Pilot of Competition Introduction x3 Pilot of Competition Introduction –

Advanced (1) Pilot of Competition Development (1) Very Positive feedback

Collaboration with Canada Basketball What does it look like? What will the role of the PSO be? When will it be ready? Who should be taking it?

Re-evaluate all developed material Re-evaluate course set-up Creation of the NCCP committee Decisions to be made:o Transfer policies – within NCCP standardso MLFs, LFs, MEs, Es (applications, who, experience, qualifications)o Pathwayo Maintenance of certification standards and plano Professional development opportunitieso Rollout plan when, where, how will coaches in our country get

trained and evaluated in our sport?o Risk Management plan – What would we do without Tim? Succession

plan for MLF’s & LF’so Fee Structureo Quality Control of LF’s and Evaluatorso Impact Assessment – how effective is the training?o LF : Coach candidate : Athlete Ratios

Context Approval Process (CAP) for each course

Conditional Approval Final Approval

How many clinics? How many LF’s, E’s? Time FrameSurveys & assessments – Nov 2010Committee creation x 2 – Nov 2010Development Committee review – Jan 2011Policy Committee review – Jan 2011Final Development Committee review – Mar 2011Final Policy Committee Review – Mar 2011CAP CC – Apr 2011CAP IC – May 2011CAP Comp Dev – June 2011CAP ICA – July 2011Full Implementation – Fall 2011

What do my levels give me? What is necessary to upgrade? Replace? NCCP Minimum standards combined with WBC

standards Example; CAC, “Coach has Level 1 certification will

be granted – at a minimum TRAINED status in either Community Coach or Competition Introduction.

Can ONLY be assigned TRAINED or CERTIFIED in Community Coach or Competition Introduction”

WBC will then have a policy that states; “all Level 1 Certified coaches will receive CERTIFIED status in Community Coach & IN TRAINING status for Competition Introduction”** for example

If a coach has only Theory 1 and / or 2, they receive no status in the New NCCP

Level III transfer has not been finalized yet with CAC

Levels IV & V are targeted for June 2011

How / who manages it all Numbers, numbers, numbers How many top-level coaches do we have to fill the role of LF’s? How many evaluators can we have without doubling up LF’s and evaluators should be different in different streams How do we evaluate a coach in Moosonee, ON? How can we expect a coach in Saint John, NB to take a course

when the closest one offered is in Montreal? (not a new problem)

How can we be expected to run courses with 2-3 attendees? (not a new problem)

Ensuring we have the right athletes at that stage for the coach to work with

How do we ensure the program is able to sustain itself financially?

What do we do if we don’t have Tim?

What are the PSO needs? Community vs. Competition LF’s, Evaluators, courses Are you comfortable with a single LF in

your province and who that LF is?

Building of the toolkit resource Funding through your Provincial

Coaching Association Important to note that what we have

provided this past 6 months is NOT the norm (cost sharing etc.)

We have one chance to do this and to do it right