* our design: dna killer automata

1
* Our Design: DNA Killer * Our Design: DNA Killer Automata Automata Existing Cancer Therapies Expensive Inefficient Inaccurate Serious Side Effects 1. DKA enter cells through injection 2. DKA detect the presence of cancer in the cell 3. DKA releases GCVTPs if all cancer indicators are detected 4. GCVTPs propagate to nearby cancer cells through homologous GJIC 5. After propagation, GCVTPs hav entered over 90% of all canc DNA Killer Automaton (DKA) DNA Killer Automaton (DKA) The Intelligent Nanomedicine The Intelligent Nanomedicine Shaoshan Liu and Jean-Luc Gaudiot Shaoshan Liu and Jean-Luc Gaudiot Electrical Engineering & Computer Science Dept., The Henry Electrical Engineering & Computer Science Dept., The Henry Samueli School of Engineering Samueli School of Engineering University of California, Irvine University of California, Irvine Using nanotechnology to build an automaton that cures cancer at Using nanotechnology to build an automaton that cures cancer at the molecular level. the molecular level. * Simulation: a discrete cellular automaton * Simulation: a discrete cellular automaton model model Experiment Experiment DKA DKA Cytotoxin Cytotoxin Enzyme Enzyme Cell Cell mRNA mRNA GJIC GJIC Object Oriented Object Oriented Simulation Simulation Level Level 1 1 Level Level 2 2 Level Level 3 3 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0.25 0.8 1.3 2.05 8.3 14.25 18.9 59 Percentage ofC ancer C ells Entered by D K As P ercen tag e o f C an ce r C e lls K 10% cancercells 50% cancercells 100% cancercells 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Num berofDKAs Used P e rc e n ta g e o f C a n c e r C e 10% cancercells 50% cancercells 100% cancercells Yes Start DKA No Positive diagnosis Release cytotoxin Negative diagnosis Cytotoxin propagation DKA term ination Cancerindicator present Cancerindicator absent DKA DKA Algorithm Algorithm * Conclusion * Conclusion Our software Our software simulation model suggests simulation model suggests that the that the bystander bystander effect effect facilitates the facilitates the propagation of DKA. Also, propagation of DKA. Also, our simulation results our simulation results suggest imply that the suggest imply that the efficacy of DKA is efficacy of DKA is linearly dependent on its linearly dependent on its dose and the degree of dose and the degree of connectivity between connectivity between cancer cells. cancer cells. Efficacy of cancer cell killing Efficacy of cancer cell killing DKA efficacy Vs. DKA DKA efficacy Vs. DKA dose dose DKA efficacy Vs. number of cells hit DKA efficacy Vs. number of cells hit 3-Stage 3-Stage Simulation Simulation Distributio Distributio n of DKA n of DKA Cancer Cancer detection detection Cytotoxin Cytotoxin propagation propagation

Upload: mizell

Post on 27-Jan-2016

37 views

Category:

Documents


8 download

DESCRIPTION

DNA Killer Automaton (DKA) The Intelligent Nanomedicine Shaoshan Liu and Jean-Luc Gaudiot Electrical Engineering & Computer Science Dept., The Henry Samueli School of Engineering University of California, Irvine. DKA Algorithm. Object Oriented Simulation. Level 1. Experiment. Cell. DKA. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: * Our Design: DNA Killer Automata

* Our Design: DNA Killer Automata* Our Design: DNA Killer Automata

Existing Cancer Therapies

• Expensive

• Inefficient

• Inaccurate

• Serious Side Effects

1. DKA enter cells through injection

2. DKA detect the presence of cancer in the cell

3. DKA releases GCVTPs if all cancer indicators are detected

4. GCVTPs propagate to nearby cancer cells through homologous GJIC

5. After propagation, GCVTPs have entered over 90% of all cancer cells

DNA Killer Automaton (DKA)DNA Killer Automaton (DKA)

The Intelligent NanomedicineThe Intelligent Nanomedicine

Shaoshan Liu and Jean-Luc GaudiotShaoshan Liu and Jean-Luc GaudiotElectrical Engineering & Computer Science Dept., The Henry Samueli Electrical Engineering & Computer Science Dept., The Henry Samueli

School of EngineeringSchool of EngineeringUniversity of California, IrvineUniversity of California, Irvine

Using nanotechnology to build an automaton that cures cancer at the Using nanotechnology to build an automaton that cures cancer at the molecular level.molecular level.

* Simulation: a discrete cellular automaton model* Simulation: a discrete cellular automaton model

ExperimentExperiment

DKADKA

CytotoxinCytotoxinEnzymeEnzyme

CellCell

mRNAmRNAGJICGJIC

Object Oriented SimulationObject Oriented Simulation

Level 1Level 1

Level 2Level 2

Level 3Level 3

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.25 0.8 1.3 2.05 8.3 14.25 18.9 59

Percentage of Cancer Cells Entered by DKAs

Pe

rce

nta

ge

of

Ca

nc

er

Ce

lls

Kil

led

10% cancer cells

50% cancer cells

100% cancer cells

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Number of DKAs Used

Perc

en

tag

e o

f C

an

cer

Cell

s K

ille

d

10% cancer cells

50% cancer cells

100% cancer cells

YesStartDKA

No

PositivediagnosisReleasecytotoxin

Negativediagnosis

Cytotoxinpropagation

DKAtermination

Cancer indicatorpresent

Cancer indicatorabsent

DKA AlgorithmDKA Algorithm

* Conclusion* Conclusion Our software simulation model Our software simulation model suggests that thesuggests that the bystander bystander effect effect facilitates the propagation of DKA. facilitates the propagation of DKA. Also, our simulation results suggest Also, our simulation results suggest imply that the efficacy of DKA is imply that the efficacy of DKA is linearly dependent on its dose and the linearly dependent on its dose and the degree of connectivity between degree of connectivity between cancer cells. cancer cells.

E = const. * D * NE = const. * D * N

Efficacy of cancer cell killingEfficacy of cancer cell killing

DKA efficacy Vs. DKA doseDKA efficacy Vs. DKA dose

DKA efficacy Vs. number of cells hit DKA efficacy Vs. number of cells hit

3-Stage Simulation3-Stage Simulation

•Distribution of Distribution of DKADKA

•Cancer detectionCancer detection

•Cytotoxin Cytotoxin propagationpropagation