our answer the question -- “can gm crops feed the poor” remember 70% of the food insecure in...
TRANSCRIPT
“Creating a Community of Practice in KwaZulu-Natal”
Templeton Foundation RFA Our answer the question -- “Can GM crops feed
the poor” Remember 70% of the food insecure in the World are
farmers, farm workers and rural landless Currently there are 2 major stances in the world
concerning GM In theory, GM crops are the best alternative (GM
advocates) In theory, GM crops are a dangerous alternative
(precautionary principle) ** Both groups spoke for the small farmer—
where was the voice of the small farmer in this issue?
An empirical/neutral approach to GM crops
We did not make any assumptions as to whether GM maize would help smallholders in South Africa. Experience throughout the world tells us
that technologies are adopted when there is an appropriate enabling environment **
The goal is to find out what farmers think about the technology in their communities and their ideas about the enabling environment
Challenges for including small farm voices
There are cultural & power issues. Farmers organize knowledge differently than
politicians and scientists Farmers and scientists have to learn how to
communicate with each other, just putting them in a meeting is of little use
The best way to facilitate communication about a technology is around a common activity.
Surveys are not very useful Surveys assume that the respondents are capable of
and willing to answer & are a poor tool for evaluating new technologies
Our approach is a “Community of Practice”
Our community of Practice
A group of stakeholders *which has a group of farmer experimenters at the center
Use their (the farmers) experiences to shape discussions on the use and development of technologies (& policies?) to help small farmers This will take the discussion out of the
theoretical and into the practical domain We are not promoting a technological
package.*
Community’s Focus: farmer run trials
Local varieties, hybrids, BT, roundup ready and stacked varieties
Farmer training is the “compensation” farmers receive for devoting their time to the project
Reflections on the trials by farmers and other stakeholders
You will hear the details of this experience today & tomorrow
Community of Practice’s impacts assessed by answering the following:
Can involving small holder farmers, researchers and stakeholders at all levels in on-farm research help us to clarify our thinking about technological
innovation and small farm maize production Especially has it changed our thinking about the
challenges and opportunities that small farmers have when considering improved maize technologies.
The answer for me and many of our producers is yes. We want to know your answer.