© national center for educational accountability national center for educational accountability san...
TRANSCRIPT
© National Center for Educational Accountability
NationalCenter forEducationalAccountability
San Jose, CaliforniaMarch 30, 2004
Jean Rutherford, Ed.D.,Director of Educational Initiatives, NCEA
Institute on Accountability, Best
Practices, and Comprehensive School
Reform
© N
atio
nal C
ente
r fo
r E
duca
tiona
l Acc
ount
abili
ty
““California State University Institute on Accountability, Best Practices, and Comprehensive School Reform”California State University Institute on Accountability, Best Practices, and Comprehensive School Reform”
NationalCenter forEducationalAccountability
National Center for Educational Accountabilitywww.nc4ea.org
www.just4kids.org
www.utexas.edu
www.ecs.org
The National Center for Educational AccountabilityThe National Center for Educational Accountability Just for the KidsJust for the Kids
© N
atio
nal C
ente
r fo
r E
duca
tiona
l Acc
ount
abili
ty
““California State University Institute on Accountability, Best Practices, and Comprehensive School Reform”California State University Institute on Accountability, Best Practices, and Comprehensive School Reform”
NationalCenter forEducationalAccountability
© N
atio
nal C
ente
r fo
r E
duca
tiona
l Acc
ount
abili
ty
““California State University Institute on Accountability, Best Practices, and Comprehensive School Reform”California State University Institute on Accountability, Best Practices, and Comprehensive School Reform”
NationalCenter forEducationalAccountability
Mississippi
New Hampshire
New Mexico
New York
Arizona
Georgia
Hawaii
Illinois
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Tennessee
Texas
Washington
States on the JFTK website:
States committed to the model:
Florida
Massachusetts
New Jersey
Louisiana
Michigan
Minnesota
North Carolina
Oklahoma
Virginia
Alabama
Connecticut
Delaware
States in discussion:Idaho
Maryland
Pennsylvania
Oregon
The National Center for Educational AccountabilityThe National Center for Educational Accountability Just for the KidsJust for the Kids
© N
atio
nal C
ente
r fo
r E
duca
tiona
l Acc
ount
abili
ty
““California State University Institute on Accountability, Best Practices, and Comprehensive School Reform”California State University Institute on Accountability, Best Practices, and Comprehensive School Reform”
NationalCenter forEducationalAccountability
In 2004, ten state best practice studies have been completed or are underway
Arkansas California Colorado Florida Illinois Massachusetts New Jersey Tennessee Texas* Washington*
Arkansas California Colorado Florida Illinois Massachusetts New Jersey Tennessee Texas* Washington*
JFTK Best Practice Study ProcessJFTK Best Practice Study Process
© N
atio
nal C
ente
r fo
r E
duca
tiona
l Acc
ount
abili
ty
““California State University Institute on Accountability, Best Practices, and Comprehensive School Reform”California State University Institute on Accountability, Best Practices, and Comprehensive School Reform”
NationalCenter forEducationalAccountability University Partners
University of ArkansasThe California State University System Colorado State University :Research and Development CenterFlorida Atlantic UniversityIllinois State University: School of EducationTennessee State UniversityThe University of Texas at AustinWashington School Research Center –Seattle Pacific University
Current partners in statewide research projects:
Potential research partners in development:
The University of Alabama at BirminghamRutgers University (New Jersey)Harvard University (Massachusetts)State University of New York (SUNY) at Albany
JFTK Best Practice Study ProcessJFTK Best Practice Study Process
© N
atio
nal C
ente
r fo
r E
duca
tiona
l Acc
ount
abili
ty
““California State University Institute on Accountability, Best Practices, and Comprehensive School Reform”California State University Institute on Accountability, Best Practices, and Comprehensive School Reform”
NationalCenter forEducationalAccountability Identifying HP and AP Schools
JFTK Best Practice Study ProcessJFTK Best Practice Study Process
© N
atio
nal C
ente
r fo
r E
duca
tiona
l Acc
ount
abili
ty
““California State University Institute on Accountability, Best Practices, and Comprehensive School Reform”California State University Institute on Accountability, Best Practices, and Comprehensive School Reform”
NationalCenter forEducationalAccountability
What school system practices influence student learning?
Who must be responsible for assuring each practice is present?
AvoidableGAP
The ThemesJFTK Best Practice Study JFTK Best Practice Study
© N
atio
nal C
ente
r fo
r E
duca
tiona
l Acc
ount
abili
ty
““California State University Institute on Accountability, Best Practices, and Comprehensive School Reform”California State University Institute on Accountability, Best Practices, and Comprehensive School Reform”
NationalCenter forEducationalAccountability
What school system practices influence student learning?
AvoidableGAPAvoidableGAP
AvoidableGAP
AvoidableGapRecognition, Intervention, and Adjustment
The ThemesJFTK Best Practice Study JFTK Best Practice Study
Staff Selection, Leadership, and Capacity Building
Curriculum and Academic Goals
Monitoring: Compilation, Analysis, and Use of Data
Instructional Programs, Practices, and Arrangements
© N
atio
nal C
ente
r fo
r E
duca
tiona
l Acc
ount
abili
ty
““California State University Institute on Accountability, Best Practices, and Comprehensive School Reform”California State University Institute on Accountability, Best Practices, and Comprehensive School Reform”
NationalCenter forEducationalAccountability
Who must be responsible for assuring each practice is present?
Staff Selection, Leadership, and Capacity Building
Monitoring: Compilation, Analysis, and Use of Data
Instructional Programs, Practices, and Arrangements
Curriculum and Academic Goals
Recognition, Intervention, and Adjustment
District School Classroom
The ThemesJFTK Best Practice Study JFTK Best Practice Study
Co
re B
elie
fs a
bo
ut
Tea
chin
g a
nd
Lea
rnin
g
Org
aniz
atio
nal
Kn
ow
led
ge
Res
ou
rce
All
oca
tio
n
Lo
cal
Infl
uen
ces,
Rel
atio
nsh
ips,
Co
mm
un
icat
ion
Define and UnpackSpecific Academic
Objectives by Grade and Subject
Provide Strong Instructional Leaders, HQ
Teachers, and Aligned PD
Provide Scientifically Based,
Evidence-Based Instructional
Programs
Develop Student Assessment and Data Monitoring
Systems: MonitorSchool
Performance
Recognize, Intervene, or
Adjust Based on School
Performance
Focus School Plan on Explicit Improvement of Performance on
Academic Objectives
Select, Develop,and Allocate Staff
Based onStudent Learning
Ensure the Use of Scientifically Based,
Evidence-Based Programs, Practices,
and Arrangementsin every Classroom
Monitor Teacher Performance and Student Learning
Recognize, Intervene, or
Adjust Based on Teacher and
Student Performance
Ensure Teaching Content
is based on Specified Academic Objectives
Collaborate in Grade/Subject Level Teams focused on
Student Work
Use Scientifically Based,
Evidence-Based Programs,
Practices, and Arrangements
Monitor Student Learning
Recognize, Intervene, or
Adjust Based on Student
Performance
Co
re B
elie
fs a
bo
ut
Tea
chin
g a
nd
Lea
rnin
g
Org
aniz
atio
nal
Kn
ow
led
ge
Res
ou
rce
All
oca
tio
n
Lo
cal
Infl
uen
ces,
Rel
atio
nsh
ips,
Co
mm
un
icat
ion
Define and UnpackSpecific Academic
Objectives by Grade and Subject
Provide Strong Instructional Leaders, HQ
Teachers, and Aligned PD
Provide Scientifically Based,
Evidence-Based Instructional
Programs
Develop Student Assessment and Data Monitoring
Systems: MonitorSchool
Performance
Recognize, Intervene, or
Adjust Based on School
Performance
Focus School Plan on Explicit Improvement of Performance on
Academic Objectives
Select, Develop,and Allocate Staff
Based onStudent Learning
Ensure the Use of Scientifically Based,
Evidence-Based Programs, Practices,
and Arrangementsin every Classroom
Monitor Teacher Performance and Student Learning
Recognize, Intervene, or
Adjust Based on Teacher and
Student Performance
Ensure Teaching Content
is based on Specified Academic Objectives
Collaborate in Grade/Subject Level Teams focused on
Student Work
Use Scientifically Based,
Evidence-Based Programs,
Practices, and Arrangements
Monitor Student Learning
Recognize, Intervene, or
Adjust Based on Student
Performance
Co
re B
elie
fs a
bo
ut
Tea
chin
g a
nd
Lea
rnin
g
Org
aniz
atio
nal
Kn
ow
led
ge
Res
ou
rce
All
oca
tio
n
Lo
cal
Infl
uen
ces,
Rel
atio
nsh
ips,
Co
mm
un
icat
ion
Define and UnpackSpecific Academic
Objectives by Grade and Subject
Provide Strong Instructional Leaders, HQ
Teachers, and Aligned PD
Provide Scientifically Based,
Evidence-Based Instructional
Programs
Develop Student Assessment and Data Monitoring
Systems: MonitorSchool
Performance
Recognize, Intervene, or
Adjust Based on School
Performance
Focus School Plan on Explicit Improvement of Performance on
Academic Objectives
Select, Develop,and Allocate Staff
Based onStudent Learning
Ensure the Use of Scientifically Based,
Evidence-Based Programs, Practices,
and Arrangementsin every Classroom
Monitor Teacher Performance and Student Learning
Recognize, Intervene, or
Adjust Based on Teacher and
Student Performance
Ensure Teaching Content
is based on Specified Academic Objectives
Collaborate in Grade/Subject Level Teams focused on
Student Work
Use Scientifically Based,
Evidence-Based Programs,
Practices, and Arrangements
Monitor Student Learning
Recognize, Intervene, or
Adjust Based on Student
Performance
Lo
cal
Infl
uen
ces,
Rel
atio
nsh
ips,
Co
mm
un
icat
ion
Res
ou
rce
All
oca
tio
n
Org
aniz
atio
nal
Kn
ow
led
ge
Co
re B
elie
fs a
bo
ut
Tea
chin
g a
nd
Lea
rnin
g
CURRICULUM/ACADEMIC GOALS
© N
atio
nal C
ente
r fo
r E
duca
tiona
l Acc
ount
abili
ty
DISTRICTSCHOOL
CLASSROOM
NationalCenter forEducationalAccountability
Define and UnpackSpecific Academic
Objectives by Grade and Subject
Focus School PlanOn Explicit
Improvement of Performance on
Academic Objectives
Ensure Teaching Content is based on Specified Academic
Objectives
Theme: Curriculum and Academic GoalsJFTK Best Practice FrameworkJFTK Best Practice Framework
Critical Attributes
and
Evidence
CURRICULUM/ACADEMIC GOALS
© N
atio
nal C
ente
r fo
r E
duca
tiona
l Acc
ount
abili
ty
DISTRICTSCHOOL
CLASSROOM
NationalCenter forEducationalAccountability
Per
form
ance
Lev
el
Low
High
Middle
“Haven’t we already done this?”
“We use the state standards. They are clear. We trust our teachers enough not to have to spell them out any more specifically.”
“There is ALWAYS work to be done to further understand and interpret the standards—especially in terms of the rigor and student work expectations for each standard.”
Theme: Curriculum and Academic GoalsJFTK Best Practice FrameworkJFTK Best Practice Framework
CURRICULUM/ACADEMIC GOALS
© N
atio
nal C
ente
r fo
r E
duca
tiona
l Acc
ount
abili
ty
DISTRICTSCHOOL
CLASSROOM
NationalCenter forEducationalAccountability
121110987654321KGrade Level
Teacher Impact
100% 50% 33.6% 25% 20% 16.6% 14.3% 12.5% 11% 10% 9% 8% 7.7%
Teacher Accountability
7.7% 15.4% 23.1% 30.8% 38.5% 46.2% 53.9% 61.6% 69.3% 77% 84.7% 92.4% 100%
46.2% 23.1% 30.7%
School Impact
100%
District Impact
Theme: Curriculum and Academic GoalsJFTK Best Practice FrameworkJFTK Best Practice Framework
CURRICULUM/ACADEMIC GOALS
© N
atio
nal C
ente
r fo
r E
duca
tiona
l Acc
ount
abili
ty
DISTRICTSCHOOL
CLASSROOM
NationalCenter forEducationalAccountability
Houston Independent School DistrictHouston Independent School DistrictHouston, Texas
The CLEAR CurriculumContent Specifications
Detailed expectations for student learning for each objective
Alignment to adopted textbook
Prerequisites
Instructional Considerations
Assessment Considerations
Connections to Other Objectives
Modifications for Special Populations
Exemplars of Student Work
Jane KoucharDirector of Curriculum, HISD
CURRICULUM/ACADEMIC GOALS
© N
atio
nal C
ente
r fo
r E
duca
tiona
l Acc
ount
abili
ty
DISTRICTSCHOOL
CLASSROOM
NationalCenter forEducationalAccountability
Provide Strong Instructional Leaders,
Highly Qualified Teachers, and Aligned
Professional Development
Select, Develop, and Allocate Staff based on Student Learning
Collaborate in Grade/Subject Level Teams focused on
Student Work
Theme: Staff Selection, Leadership, and Capacity BuildingJFTK Best Practice FrameworkJFTK Best Practice Framework
Critical Attributes
and
Evidence
CURRICULUM/ACADEMIC GOALS
© N
atio
nal C
ente
r fo
r E
duca
tiona
l Acc
ount
abili
ty
DISTRICTSCHOOL
CLASSROOM
NationalCenter forEducationalAccountability
Rich and Deep Staff Selection Systems
Specific programs to develop quality teacher and principal candidates
Heavy emphasis on internal development of future leaders
Extensive partnerships with colleges and universities to encourage students to pursue teaching careers
Identification of staff who are “right” for school
JFTK Best Practice FrameworkJFTK Best Practice Framework Theme: Staff Selection, Leadership, and Capacity Building
CURRICULUM/ACADEMIC GOALS
© N
atio
nal C
ente
r fo
r E
duca
tiona
l Acc
ount
abili
ty
DISTRICTSCHOOL
CLASSROOM
NationalCenter forEducationalAccountability
Rich and Deep Induction and Support Systems
Extended and progressive induction programs designed for 1st, 2nd, and 3rd year administrators and teachers
Curriculum and instruction-focused mentoring and support
Mentor teachers/principals chosen based on proven effectiveness in terms of student performance Layered/scaffolded mentoring and support, i.e., mentor teachers, content-area specialists, instructional specialists, assessment specialists, etc.
JFTK Best Practice FrameworkJFTK Best Practice Framework Theme: Staff Selection, Leadership, and Capacity Building
CURRICULUM/ACADEMIC GOALS
© N
atio
nal C
ente
r fo
r E
duca
tiona
l Acc
ount
abili
ty
DISTRICTSCHOOL
CLASSROOM
NationalCenter forEducationalAccountability
Aligned Professional Development
Data-driven
Content-and process-oriented
Job-embedded/Individualized Classroom-based/Collaborative Continuous and ongoing Heavily aligned to standards and to chosen instructional resources
JFTK Best Practice FrameworkJFTK Best Practice Framework Theme: Staff Selection, Leadership, and Capacity Building
CURRICULUM/ACADEMIC GOALS
© N
atio
nal C
ente
r fo
r E
duca
tiona
l Acc
ount
abili
ty
DISTRICTSCHOOL
CLASSROOM
NationalCenter forEducationalAccountability
Supporting Strong Instructional LeadersStaff Development Driven by DataPrincipal Study GroupsPrincipal Advisory GroupsNew Principal Support ProgramsInstructional SpecialistsPartnering with Outside Providers
Supporting Strong Teachers and Teacher LeadersLiteracy Implementation TeamsSite CoachesVertical and Horizontal CollaborationNew Teacher Support ProgramInstructional SpecialistsResearch Based Sustained Staff DevelopmentGrowth OpportunitiesRevise and Revisit Instructional Topics
Garden Grove Unified School DistrictGarden Grove Unified School DistrictGarden Grove, California
Sherry FranklinAsst. Supt. of Elementary
Instruction, GGUSD
CURRICULUM/ACADEMIC GOALS
© N
atio
nal C
ente
r fo
r E
duca
tiona
l Acc
ount
abili
ty
DISTRICTSCHOOL
CLASSROOM
NationalCenter forEducationalAccountability
Long Beach Unified School DistrictLong Beach Unified School DistrictLong Beach, California
“Learning from the Best”
LBUSD completes case studies of the highest-performing teachers’ classrooms. The case study includes: video clips, an outline of instructional materials used, a review of instructional strategies, and intervention activities. These case studies are then used for teacher support purposes.
Additional Support OpportunitiesCurriculum LeadersInstructional Materials LabLiteracy and Math CoachesEssential Elements of Instruction CoachesLindamood Bell Coaches
Cynthia TerryCabrillo High School Co-Principal, LBUSD
© N
atio
nal C
ente
r fo
r E
duca
tiona
l Acc
ount
abili
ty
NationalCenter forEducationalAccountability
Provide Scientifically Based, Evidence-
Based Instructional Programs
Ensure the Use of Scientifically Based,
Evidence-Based Programs, Practices, and Arrangements in
every Classroom
Use Scientifically Based, Evidence-Based Programs,
Practices, and Arrangements
JFTK Best Practice FrameworkJFTK Best Practice Framework Theme: Instructional Programs, Practices, and Arrangements
Critical Attributes
and
Evidence
© N
atio
nal C
ente
r fo
r E
duca
tiona
l Acc
ount
abili
ty
NationalCenter forEducationalAccountability
Mixture of Prescription and AutonomyTight and Loose Governance
Instructional Time
Grouping Models
Instructional Planning Time/Collaboration
Basic Instructional Programs
Instructional Strategies
Use of Data for Decision-Making
Specific and Measurable Improvement Goals
JFTK Best Practice FrameworkJFTK Best Practice Framework Theme: Instructional Programs, Practices, and Arrangements
© N
atio
nal C
ente
r fo
r E
duca
tiona
l Acc
ount
abili
ty
NationalCenter forEducationalAccountability
Monitor Teacher Performance and Student Learning
Develop Student Assessment and Data Monitoring Systems:
Monitor Student Performance
Monitor Student Learning
JFTK Best Practice FrameworkJFTK Best Practice Framework Theme: Monitoring: Compilation, Analysis, and Use of Data
Audit your Practices
© N
atio
nal C
ente
r fo
r E
duca
tiona
l Acc
ount
abili
ty
NationalCenter forEducationalAccountability
Strong Instructional
LeadersHighly-Qualified
Teachers
AlignedProfessional Development
Evidence-BasedTools and Resources
…and then assuring that we have provided the necessary staff, tools, and resources for them to learn it, we must ask:
After determining WHAT it is that all children are expected to learn by grade and subject,
“How will we know if they have learned it?”
JFTK Best Practice FrameworkJFTK Best Practice Framework Theme: Monitoring: Compilation, Analysis, and Use of Data
© N
atio
nal C
ente
r fo
r E
duca
tiona
l Acc
ount
abili
ty
NationalCenter forEducationalAccountability
State: Assessment
District: Benchmark
Assessments
School: Unit Tests
Teacher: Daily Monitoring
State: Assessment
Teacher: Daily Monitoring
JFTK Best Practice FrameworkJFTK Best Practice Framework Theme: Monitoring: Compilation, Analysis, and Use of Data
© N
atio
nal C
ente
r fo
r E
duca
tiona
l Acc
ount
abili
ty
NationalCenter forEducationalAccountability
Long Beach Unified School DistrictLong Beach Unified School DistrictLong Beach, California
“Hour-by-Hourand
Minute-by-Minute”
“You are catching us in the middle of a marathon. We’re just beginning to run. We can stop and reflect, but we are focused on what additional things we can begin to do to
bridge the learning gaps we have.”
Christine DominguezAsst. Supt. of Curriculum,
Instruction, and Professional Development, LBUSD
© N
atio
nal C
ente
r fo
r E
duca
tiona
l Acc
ount
abili
ty
NationalCenter forEducationalAccountability
Recognize, Intervene, or Adjust Based on Teacher
and Student Performance
Recognize, Intervene, or Adjust
Based on School Performance
Recognize, Intervene, or Adjust Based on Student
Performance
JFTK Best Practice FrameworkJFTK Best Practice Framework Theme: Recognition, Intervention, or Adjustment
staging.just4kids.org/bestpractice/self_audit_master_report.cfm
© N
atio
nal C
ente
r fo
r E
duca
tiona
l Acc
ount
abili
ty
NationalCenter forEducationalAccountability
Strong Instructional
Leaders
Highly-QualifiedTeachers
AlignedProfessional Development
Evidence-BasedTools and Resources
“What are we going to do if a student does not learn what we said he or she would learn
in any particular grade or subject?”
The most important question of all…
JFTK Best Practice FrameworkJFTK Best Practice Framework Theme: Recognition, Intervention, or Adjustment
© N
atio
nal C
ente
r fo
r E
duca
tiona
l Acc
ount
abili
ty
NationalCenter forEducationalAccountability
Time to Learn
Resources and Support to Learn
If learning the stated objectives is NOT going to vary among students, then what must vary?
The Intervention
JFTK Best Practice FrameworkJFTK Best Practice Framework Theme: Recognition, Intervention, or Adjustment