© michel grundstein, camille rosenthal-sabroux mg conseil repères pour le knowledge management...

© Michel Grundstein, Camille Rosenthal-Sabroux

MG ConseilMG ConseilRepères pour le Knowledge ManagementRepères pour le Knowledge Management

LAMSADELAMSADEUniversité Paris Université Paris

DauphineDauphine

Community of PracticeCommunity of PracticeWORKSHOP SIGECAD’05 WORKSHOP SIGECAD’05

JJune 28, 2005une 28, 2005




DauphineDauphine

Organizational Committee

– Michel Grundstein (Consulting Engineer and Associated Researcher at LAMSADE)

– Takaya Kawamura (Associate Professor at Graduate School of Business, Osaka City University in Osaka, Japan)

– Philippe Lorino (Full Professor at ESSEC Graduate Business School in Management Control)

– Camille Rosenthal-Sabroux (Full Professor at Dauphine University, Paris IX )




DauphineDauphine

Contributors

– Eric Laurent : Laposte

– Romuald Messina : Air Liquide

– Martin Roulleaux-Dugage : Schneider Electric




DauphineDauphine

Participants

– PHD students SIGECAD Group, Paris Dauphine University, Master Degree

– ESSEC

– Graduate School of Business, Osaka City University in Osaka, Japan




DauphineDauphine

SIGECAD SEMINAR

A first approach, focussed on the codification of explicit, stable and well defined knowledge (i.e. generally speaking scientific and technical knowledge), coming under the implementation of computer tools and data bases.

A second approach, focused on exchanging sharing tacit and dynamic knowledge (i.e. generally speaking organisational knowledge), coming under network functioning and leading of community of practices (CoP).

A third approach, focused on the company’s performances, coming under decision processes, learning processes and competences management.

Moreover, we noticed the essential role of Information Technologies (IT), which are at the same time:

A support to the company’s activities Productive of technical and rigid organizational infrastructures A factor of fundamental break in our relationship to space, time,

knowledge, reality perception and the world of material objects.




DauphineDauphine

PROBLEMATIC OF THE WORKSHOP SIGECAD’05

“Management of activities and processes that enhance creation and utilization of knowledge within an organization, aim at two strongly linked goals: a patrimony goal and a sustainable innovation goal with economic and strategic, organizational, socio-cultural and technological underlying dimensions”.




DauphineDauphine

PLANNING

– 9h30 – 9h45 Introduction Professor Camille Rosenthal-Sabroux et Michel Grundstein

– 9h45 - 10h30 Intervention Eric Laurent (La poste) – 10h30-11h Coffee break – 11h - 11h45 Intervention Martin Roulleau Dugage (Schneider

Electric) – 11h45 - 12h30 Intervention Romuald Messina (Air Liquide)– 12h30- 14h Lunch– 14h- 14h30 Professor Takaya Kawamura (Graduate School of

Business, Osaka City University, Japan)– 14h30- 15h30 Chairman discussion Professor Philippe Lorino– 15h30-16h Coffee break – 16h-17h Synthesis




DauphineDauphine

Definition of Community of Practice According to Wenger, McDermott and Snyder (2002)

« Community of practice are groups of people who share a concern, a set of problem, or a passion about a topic, and who deepen their knowledge and expertise in this area by interacting on an ongoing basis. …These people don’t necessarily work together every day, but they may meet because they find value in their interactions. As they spend time together, they typically share information, insight and advice. They help each other solve problems. They discuss their situations, their aspirations, and their needs. They ponder common issues, explore ideas, and act as sounding boards. They may create tools, standards, generic designs, manuals, and other documents – or they may simply develop a tacit understanding that they share. However they accumulate knowledge, they become informally bound by the value that they find in learning together. This value is not merely instrumental for their work. It also accrues in the personal satisfaction of knowing colleagues who understand each other’s perspectives and of belonging to an interesting group of people. Overtime, they develop a unique perspective on their topic as well as a body of common knowledge, practices, and approaches. They also develop personal relationships and established ways of interacting. They may even develop a common sense of identity. They become a community of practice. »




DauphineDauphine

QUESTIONS TO DISCUSS Definition of CoP

– Do you think there are CoPs in your company, following the definition given by Wenger ?

– What are the differences and/or merits of fostering the concept “CoP” instead of using other concepts as “teamwork”, “project team”, “task force” or “autonomous work group” … in your company?




DauphineDauphine

CoP and organization Relationships Of communities to official organizations

Relationship Definition Typical Challenges

Unrecognized Invisible to the organization and sometimes even to members themselves

Difficult to see value and be aware of limitations, may not involve everyone who should participate

Bootlegged Only visible informally to a circle of people “in the know”

Getting resources, having an impact, keeping hidden, gaining legitimacy

Legitimized Officially sanctioned as a valuable entity

Broader visibility, rapid growth, new demands and expectation

Supported Provided with direct resources from the organization

Scrutiny; accountability for use of resources, effort, and time; short-term pressures

Institutionalized Given an official status and function in the organization

Fixed definition, over-management, living beyond its usefulness




DauphineDauphine

QUESTIONS TO DISCUSS CoP and organization

Relationships Of communities to official organizations

Following these typologies, which kind of relationship between CoP and your organization do you identify in your company ?

Advantage and drawback of :

Formal recognition by the business organization of CoP ?

Formal institutionalization in the business organization of CoP ?

Formal evaluation the business organization of CoP ?




DauphineDauphine

QUESTIONS TO DISCUSS CoP and strategy

– Are CoPs recognized and treated as strategic resources in your company ?

– Are some specific perspectives of CoPs integrated in the process of establishing organizational strategy?

– Do you think that cultivating CoP at the interorganizational project team provide a new solution to the well-known problem of “competition and cooperation” among organization involved? How the result of innovation achieved by the interorganizational CoP be shared and distributed?

© michel grundstein, camille rosenthal-sabroux mg conseil repères pour le knowledge management...

Documents