© mahindra satyam 2009 decision analysis and resolution qms training
TRANSCRIPT
© Mahindra Satyam 2009
Decision Analysis and Resolution
QMS Training
2
© Mahindra Satyam 2009
Objective
To ensure systematic decision making in all the scenarios where several alternatives exist
and an appropriate decision is sought for.
Mahindra Satyam Confidential
3
© Mahindra Satyam 2009
Process
Identify scenarios where Structure Decision is required
Identify the Decision Making Technique
Make the Decision
Define Criteria for Selecting Alternatives
Identify Alternatives
Mahindra Satyam Confidential
4
© Mahindra Satyam 2009
Identify Scenarios
Identify scenarios where structure decision is required Possible scenarios provided in PP template
– Technology Selection for the Project– Design Architecture Evaluation – Selection of tools to be deployed in the project– Make/Re-use/Buy
Other scenarios where structured decision analysis process can be applied are: – When the decision is related to topics assessed as being of
high or medium risk– When the decision could cause significant scheduling delays– When the costs of the decision process are reasonable
compared to the decision’s impact.
Mahindra Satyam Confidential
5
© Mahindra Satyam 2009
Identify Decision Making Technique
Select decision making technique to be used. The possible techniques are Pugh Matrix Brainstorming QFD Delphi
The recommended technique is Pugh Matrix
Mahindra Satyam Confidential
6
© Mahindra Satyam 2009
PUGH Matrix
Following are the steps to construct a Pugh Matrix Determine a weight for each criteria. One of the weighting methods is to use
weight levels that sum to 10 or 100 giving higher numbers to more important criteria and lower numbers to less important criteria. Another method is to assign relative weights ignoring the sum that results.
Multiply the rating of an alternative by the weight assigned and sum across all criteria. Divide this sum by the sum of the weights. The result is the composite rating for the alternative.
Alternate solutions are evaluated using the identified decision making technique and appropriate solution is selected
The selected solution is then implemented
Mahindra Satyam Confidential
7
© Mahindra Satyam 2009
Identify Alternatives
For every instance of DAR, list of all the possible choices is made
– including the choice of doing nothing, if required recorded in the technique template identified [e.g.: PUGH matrix or QFD
template] for decision-making
Mahindra Satyam Confidential
8
© Mahindra Satyam 2009
Define Criteria for Selecting Alternatives
Determine evaluation criteria - for the identified scenarios, decide the evaluation criteria for making a decisionSome generic evaluation criteria are Impact on cost Schedule Performance Efficiency Risk strategies
Mahindra Satyam Confidential
9
© Mahindra Satyam 2009
Evaluation Criteria
Decision Scenario Evaluation Criteria
Technology Selection for a project
Availability Interoperability Modularity Adaptability Scalability Portability Extensibility Reliability Maintainability Conformance Security Long Life
Mahindra Satyam Confidential
10
© Mahindra Satyam 2009
Evaluation Criteria
Decision Scenario Evaluation Criteria
Design Architecture Evaluation
Data Design Architectural and
component level design User interface design Technical issues Security Restrictions or Limitations Portability Scalability
Mahindra Satyam Confidential
11
© Mahindra Satyam 2009
Evaluation Criteria
Decision Scenario Evaluation Criteria
Selection of tools to be deployed in the project
Completeness Usability Platforms / Installations Reliability and Robustness Consistency Recovery mechanisms Functional Specifications Product reputation & industry acceptance Support availability Licensing options Customization Documentation quality
Mahindra Satyam Confidential
12
© Mahindra Satyam 2009
Evaluation Criteria
Decision Scenario Evaluation Criteria
Make/Re-use/Buy related decision scenarios
Productivity Quality Performance Risk Factors Strategic advantages Payback Infrastructure Training
Mahindra Satyam Confidential
13
© Mahindra Satyam 2009
Evaluation Criteria
For Organizational decisions some of the evaluation criteria could be Potential Impact on company performance Ease to Implement Cost / Benefit relationship Speed of implementation Acceptance by stakeholders Negative impact on environment
Mahindra Satyam Confidential
14
© Mahindra Satyam 2009
Make the Decision
Based on the evaluation of the alternatives, most appropriate solution is identified Customer is approached in situations where the decision/solution impacts the
customer PM approves the decision based on the analysis Record the decision taken and all required details in the DAR Record template
Mahindra Satyam Confidential
15
© Mahindra Satyam 2009
Objective Met
All scenarios where Structured Decision Making is required are identified DAR Techniques are used to achieve the desired result
Mahindra Satyam Confidential