© mahindra satyam 2009 decision analysis and resolution qms training

15
© Mahindra Satyam 2009 Decision Analysis and Resolution QMS Training

Upload: elmer-griffin

Post on 01-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: © Mahindra Satyam 2009 Decision Analysis and Resolution QMS Training

© Mahindra Satyam 2009

Decision Analysis and Resolution

QMS Training

Page 2: © Mahindra Satyam 2009 Decision Analysis and Resolution QMS Training

2

© Mahindra Satyam 2009

Objective

To ensure systematic decision making in all the scenarios where several alternatives exist

and an appropriate decision is sought for.

Mahindra Satyam Confidential

Page 3: © Mahindra Satyam 2009 Decision Analysis and Resolution QMS Training

3

© Mahindra Satyam 2009

Process

Identify scenarios where Structure Decision is required

Identify the Decision Making Technique

Make the Decision

Define Criteria for Selecting Alternatives

Identify Alternatives

Mahindra Satyam Confidential

Page 4: © Mahindra Satyam 2009 Decision Analysis and Resolution QMS Training

4

© Mahindra Satyam 2009

Identify Scenarios

Identify scenarios where structure decision is required Possible scenarios provided in PP template

– Technology Selection for the Project– Design Architecture Evaluation – Selection of tools to be deployed in the project– Make/Re-use/Buy

Other scenarios where structured decision analysis process can be applied are: – When the decision is related to topics assessed as being of

high or medium risk– When the decision could cause significant scheduling delays– When the costs of the decision process are reasonable

compared to the decision’s impact.

Mahindra Satyam Confidential

Page 5: © Mahindra Satyam 2009 Decision Analysis and Resolution QMS Training

5

© Mahindra Satyam 2009

Identify Decision Making Technique

Select decision making technique to be used. The possible techniques are Pugh Matrix Brainstorming QFD Delphi

The recommended technique is Pugh Matrix

Mahindra Satyam Confidential

Page 6: © Mahindra Satyam 2009 Decision Analysis and Resolution QMS Training

6

© Mahindra Satyam 2009

PUGH Matrix

Following are the steps to construct a Pugh Matrix Determine a weight for each criteria. One of the weighting methods is to use

weight levels that sum to 10 or 100 giving higher numbers to more important criteria and lower numbers to less important criteria. Another method is to assign relative weights ignoring the sum that results.

Multiply the rating of an alternative by the weight assigned and sum across all criteria. Divide this sum by the sum of the weights. The result is the composite rating for the alternative.

Alternate solutions are evaluated using the identified decision making technique and appropriate solution is selected

The selected solution is then implemented

Mahindra Satyam Confidential

Page 7: © Mahindra Satyam 2009 Decision Analysis and Resolution QMS Training

7

© Mahindra Satyam 2009

Identify Alternatives

For every instance of DAR, list of all the possible choices is made

– including the choice of doing nothing, if required recorded in the technique template identified [e.g.: PUGH matrix or QFD

template] for decision-making

Mahindra Satyam Confidential

Page 8: © Mahindra Satyam 2009 Decision Analysis and Resolution QMS Training

8

© Mahindra Satyam 2009

Define Criteria for Selecting Alternatives

Determine evaluation criteria - for the identified scenarios, decide the evaluation criteria for making a decisionSome generic evaluation criteria are Impact on cost Schedule Performance Efficiency Risk strategies

Mahindra Satyam Confidential

Page 9: © Mahindra Satyam 2009 Decision Analysis and Resolution QMS Training

9

© Mahindra Satyam 2009

Evaluation Criteria

Decision Scenario Evaluation Criteria

Technology Selection for a project

Availability Interoperability Modularity Adaptability Scalability Portability Extensibility Reliability Maintainability Conformance Security Long Life

Mahindra Satyam Confidential

Page 10: © Mahindra Satyam 2009 Decision Analysis and Resolution QMS Training

10

© Mahindra Satyam 2009

Evaluation Criteria

Decision Scenario Evaluation Criteria

Design Architecture Evaluation

Data Design Architectural and

component level design User interface design Technical issues Security Restrictions or Limitations Portability Scalability

Mahindra Satyam Confidential

Page 11: © Mahindra Satyam 2009 Decision Analysis and Resolution QMS Training

11

© Mahindra Satyam 2009

Evaluation Criteria

Decision Scenario Evaluation Criteria

Selection of tools to be deployed in the project

Completeness Usability Platforms / Installations Reliability and Robustness Consistency Recovery mechanisms Functional Specifications Product reputation & industry acceptance Support availability Licensing options Customization Documentation quality

Mahindra Satyam Confidential

Page 12: © Mahindra Satyam 2009 Decision Analysis and Resolution QMS Training

12

© Mahindra Satyam 2009

Evaluation Criteria

Decision Scenario Evaluation Criteria

Make/Re-use/Buy related decision scenarios

Productivity Quality Performance Risk Factors Strategic advantages Payback Infrastructure Training

Mahindra Satyam Confidential

Page 13: © Mahindra Satyam 2009 Decision Analysis and Resolution QMS Training

13

© Mahindra Satyam 2009

Evaluation Criteria

For Organizational decisions some of the evaluation criteria could be Potential Impact on company performance Ease to Implement Cost / Benefit relationship Speed of implementation Acceptance by stakeholders Negative impact on environment

Mahindra Satyam Confidential

Page 14: © Mahindra Satyam 2009 Decision Analysis and Resolution QMS Training

14

© Mahindra Satyam 2009

Make the Decision

Based on the evaluation of the alternatives, most appropriate solution is identified Customer is approached in situations where the decision/solution impacts the

customer PM approves the decision based on the analysis Record the decision taken and all required details in the DAR Record template

Mahindra Satyam Confidential

Page 15: © Mahindra Satyam 2009 Decision Analysis and Resolution QMS Training

15

© Mahindra Satyam 2009

Objective Met

All scenarios where Structured Decision Making is required are identified DAR Techniques are used to achieve the desired result

Mahindra Satyam Confidential