if we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it. efficiency is...

28
Pareto If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it. EFFICIENCY is king. If there’s a loser, compensate. If no compensation … no guidance I give to others because I’m happy

Upload: emmeline-chase

Post on 18-Dec-2015

222 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Pareto

If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.

EFFICIENCY is king. If there’s a loser, compensate. If no compensation … no guidance I give to others because I’m happy

Page 2: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Utilitarian

The greatest happiness for the greatest number

U1 + U2 + … + U150000000 If utility shows marginally

decreasing returns to income, can trade off utility

I give to others if their gain is greater than my loss.

Notice: ends justify means

Page 3: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Two “Utilitarians”

Singer If we can prevent a great deal of misery

without sacrificing anything of comparable moral value, we should.

Each person has a duty to maximize SWF Give 5%, 25%, a lot more, to reduce hunger.

Page 4: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Two “Utilitarians”

Singer If we can prevent a great deal of misery

without sacrificing anything of comparable moral value, we should.

Rawls Veil of ignorance 1 – Be free 2 – Choose the distribution to make the least

happy person as happy as possible Max(U1), then max (U2), then max (U3),

then….

Page 5: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Non-Utilitarian

1 – Deontology: the study of duty This is what you ought (not)

to do This is what a good person

would do. Doing something you should that

you don’t want to? How holy!

I give because I ought to.

Page 6: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Non-Utilitarian

1 – Deontology: the study of duty

2 – Virtue Ethics: the virtuous person Who are you becoming? “Not virtuous acts, but being a virtuous

person” – Schiller I give because I want to be a

compassionate person.

Page 7: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Non-Utilitarian

1 – Deontology: the study of duty2 – Virtue Ethics: the virtuous person

3 – Rights Duty holder and duty bearer Charity vs. Entitlement vs. Right

India ~2001

Page 8: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

“Non”-Utilitarians s

1 – Deontology: the study of duty2 – Virtue Ethics: the virtuous person3 – Rights

4 – Sen capabilitiesDevelopment is capability or freedomTransform resources into valuable activitiesMulti-dimensional

Page 9: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Non-Utilitarians

1 – Deontology: the study of duty2 – Virtue Ethics: the virtuous person3 – Rights4 – Sen capabilities

5 – NozickFreedomIs the process fair?Was the start fair?

Page 10: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

INEQUALITY AND POVERTYIn our Classroom!

Page 11: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Inequality: Kuznets

Richest/PoorestRichest 1 / Poorest 1 = 42/0Richest 10%/Poorest 10% = 119/0.3 ~ 376

R25%/P25% = 275/47 = 5.9

Page 12: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Inequality: Gini

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 310.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

Page 13: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Poverty line

Right now, 26 points/46 At end of the semester, 60/100

Headcount ratio: 68% Poverty gap: 46% Pov gap squared: 31%

Page 14: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Nozick says

You all started fairly. The process that

determines grades was fair and impartial.

The grades as they stand are equitable.

Page 15: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Karl Marx - Egalitarian

No student owns their own points. The entire class owns all points.

“From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.”

Page 16: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Marxism in Practice

Now the distribution has

Page 17: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Marxism in Practice

Now the distribution has

everyone flunking.

Page 18: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Marxism in Practice

Now the distribution has

Page 19: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Marxism in Practice

Now the distribution has

everyone flunking.

Page 20: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Marxism in Practice

Now the distribution has

Page 21: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Marxism in Practice

Now the distribution has

everyone flunking.

Page 22: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Marxism in Practice

Now the distribution has

Page 23: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Marxism in Practice

Now the distribution has

everyone flunking.

Page 24: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Marxism in Practice 20% of the points go to the government. Now the distribution has everyone flunking.

Winston Churchill:The inherent vice of capitalism is the

unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.

Page 25: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Rawls – Poorest of Poor

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 310.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

Page 26: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Robin Hood – Help Least-Poor

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 310.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

Page 27: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Before and After

A

C

D

F

A B

C

D

F

Page 28: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Singer

What is my duty to help my fellow students who aren’t doing as well as I am?