+ cognitive interventions for schizophrenia: compensatory and restorative approaches sean kidd,...
TRANSCRIPT
+ Cognitive Interventions for
Schizophrenia: Compensatory and Restorative Approaches
Sean Kidd, Ph.D.CAMH Schizophrenia DivisionUniversity of Toronto Department of PsychiatryDecember 1st, 2014
+ Funders and Collaborators
Dawn Velligan and Natalie Maples – University of Texas at San Antonio
Jaswant Kaur – George Brown College
Rohan Ganguli, Tony George, Yarissa Herman, Kwame McKenzie, Gursharan Virdee
*There are no competing interests in the work presented
+
presentation overview: a tale of two approaches
What is promising
What is problematic
What is next
+ some general background
Tools are available for addressing positive symptoms (delusions, hallucinations).
But, we have little to offer for cognitive impacts and negative symptoms
+ 1. enhance
Practice cognitive tasks
A variable literature (types of tasks, adjunct intervention)
Linking to “real world” contexts and challenges important
+
people working in CR research
Susan McGurk – Boston U
Til Wykes – London Institute of Psychiatry
Matthew Kurtz - Yale
Bruce Wexler – Yale
Chris Bowie – Queen’s U
Alice Medalia - Columbia
+ cognitive remediation – the evidence
Psychosis symptoms (highly
variable, .28 avg) Neurocognition (.41) Psychosocial functioning (.35) Gains are sustained Benefit over comparable tasks Little link between outcome and
intervention duration
+
an example – George Brown College
Built into academic curriculum
Group and individual computer exercises
+ the pilot – summer 2010
People like it!
Turned up and stayed
Improved
Kidd, S.A., Kaur Bajwa, J., Haji-Khamneh, B., McKenzie, K., & Ganguli, R. (2012). Cognitive Remediation for Individuals with Psychosis in a Supported Education Setting: A Pilot Study. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Practice, 2012, 1-5.
+ the rct
Same intervention model
Randomized in term 1
19 to CR+SE, 18 to SE
Cognitive battery, PANSS, Self Esteem, academic functioning
Baseline, term 1 end, term 2 end follow up
+ rct findings
Again people liked it, only 1 person dropped out
Cognition improved for both groups, but no improvement for CR
PANSS – no change for either group
Self Esteem (.44) sustained at f/u
Academic: More term 1 completers (.74), at f/u better contributions, attitude etc. (.64-.75)
+
challenges and what comes next
Bang for the buck and seeing evidence through the hype
Dismantling
Better screening
Better bridging and focus
Considering setting
+ Compensatory Approaches
Some overlap, but emphasize: Compensatory strategy rather than
improving function Home and non-treatment/education
contexts
+ cognitive adaptation training (CAT) - described
Focus primarily on medication taking and basic functional domains
Builds from assessment
Intensive – typically 9 months
+ cat – the evidence
Compared to control conditions, clients receiving CAT Psychosis Symptoms (mostly ns) Lower relapse rates (65% versus 19%
over 19 months) Higher levels of adaptive functioning
(1.00) Most consistently, better medication
adherence (approx 1.00) Not for everyone
+ the revision
9 months
Intensive CAT 4 months, with 5 months case manager follow up
Eval – baseline, 4 months, 9 months
Symptoms (BPRS, NSA), functioning MCAS, SOFAS, GAS
N = 23
+ considering...
Sequencing/staging in care pathways approaches
Better screening and providing individualized care
Linkages: CBT, CBSST, MBCT/SR, Supported Voc and Ed, family intervention, concurrent disorders tx
The tool is as only good as the person using it – common factors and fidelity
+ a decent summary paper
McGurk, S.R., Mueser, K.T., Covell, N.H., Cicerone, K.D., Drake, R.E., Silverstein, S.M., Medalia, A., Myers, R., Bellack, A.S., Bell, M.D., Essock, S. M., 2013. Mental health system funding of cognitive enhancement interventions for schizophrenia: Summary and update of the New York Office of Mental Health Expert Panel and Stakeholder
Meeting. Psychiat Rehab J. 36 133-145.