ð Ú c a ( v 6 7 · tambone v. 3 2004 about beauty. plast reconstr surg 2004; 114(1): 270-1....

8
Ȇ ѡШȸȹȉʂޟட፣ ѵऌᚃ৲ђजৡᚃᏱःଇȂᄈ ݾᕜਞޠݏңມೞዂጚϾளϛಭᄜȄپԄഷߗӶ ڻӲݾޠൠӬȂژᗀЖңր ف๗፤ȶѢಂЩѿಂजȷȂѵऌଌጜޠܓȂҴڔשཫ൷ဟϜᆎᆎȶजȷޤޠᜌȂ ӤѿѢЩၷȉᗚϛӤޠ҂ৰ ȉϛЗѯαޠپᅌᗀȄӲݾȞrejuvenation ȟᜱԒሇϾȃՃޠңມ ހȂᗀৡЖңȶЖΩȷȃȶቩђՍ ȷዂጚޠມཋȂӱКၮཌྷᐍםөᏱ ޠңມၮဏഎϛӤȂᕜਞ൸፤ᘟାίȄӱ ԫȶᚠ८जȷঐτᚡҭঅூΚޠᚃᏱޤᜌᆤ፤ȄᄃᚃᏱޠ੬Քᅿ໕ຠզݾᕜਞ ݏ(outcome) Ȃτഌӌޣញདྷ ژȂ׳໕Ͼዀ֊ѠȂկୱᚡءٯ٦ቅᙐȄ ᜱȶᚠ८जȷޠ໕ϾዀȂߗԒഷளೞЖң ޠНᝧ Bashour ᚃ৲ 2006 ԒӶजᐍםѵ ऌᚃᏱᚖᇭޠӲНതȄձӔӲΠ 159 ፤НޠݏȂᐤѭၦਠᙵ൳ 1 Ȅ׳ᖜഌҔ ८ၮ८םຬȂϸԚѳܗήϸޠЩ౦ȃпІ༂ ߝЩޠپኈȂᔗԥᅿԥȄկଷΠᢔᚠК ѵȂτഌϸजৡКၮဋءٯԥτൾӵ ᡑϥޠᄈЩ౦Ȃܛпܛᒞȶ༂ߝЩپȷ ޠᐄȂӶڟֆᚅఽሰၮӬ ౪К๗ޠݏโԥ४ȂңӶȶजȷޠᡞຠզ 2, 3 Ȅ ᄃᚃᏱп ق ܓР ݳᐍ౪НᝧȂॷ Ӓ׳ᎍ࿌ޠᜱᗥԆȄɆBeautyɇޠᚃᏱНᝧ ޠጓ൝ЩӒདྷޠኅȄसпНԆᄙ ཫ൷ Pubmed Ȃூ ژ5,152 فНᝧȇ४ ژዀᚡя౫ɆBeauty ɇޠНതȂηԥ 1,226 Ȅђαѫڎঐ२ޠӤဏԆɆEsthetics ɇ ᆣӫᚂᄂᜌᚂᏰϛЖ לѴऋ ቓम ڷѡШၶȶछȷ༝ȉ ʂᜰ७छ ޟᄂᜌᚂᏰᆣ፣ ᇅɆAesthetics ɇȂНതӼႁ26,949 ȇ४ᕼ ژѬӶዀᚡя౫ήԆȂНതᖃᗚାႁ 2,282 ȞߓΚȂήӗȟȄȶजȷՎЩΚ ᚃᏱȂڏҢޑȃЗ౪ȃᏱޠހဏȂϛৡпΚႲዀӬ౪ႇᘯя२ᘉȂ ӱԫҐϟःفᘜΠΚଳȄٿࡤܛژԥ ޠजৡᚃᏱᏱഎᗀȶԒሇϾȷȂӱഎᜱ ЗԒឮޠᡑϾၮᡑޠѠȂᐡΚђα ɆAging ɇၮɆAge Factor ɇڎঐᚃᏱлᚡ ᜱᗥԆ (MeSH) ٿႇᘯНᝧȂױजᏱޠНത४ ڎژԼпίȂΤϵᇰΩѠޠጓ൝Ȅ ঐНᝧཫ൷ޠစᡜঅூණٽӤՄȂө ޠȶᚠ८जȷःفѠᐄөঢ়ᜱЗޠoutcomeȂڐуᖞݸޒט؛ٽឋȄ ـਟᇄП ݲп PubMed ཫ൷ЖᔞᔯસНᝧȄᜱज ޠMeSH ᜱᗥԆԥ ɆBeautyɇ, ɆEsthetics ɇȄ ၑђαՍҦНԆ Aesthetics ቩђཫ൷ޠȂτᔯຝȂ፤Н፵໕ޠቩђԥ४Ȅजৡ ݾᕜᇅКཿܛᜱЗޠȶᚠ८जȷлᚡȂђα Facial ᜱᗥԆȂᄈःܛفٯϛӼȄ ΚՄኍᐍ םѵऌளңႲ ޠMeSH ມཋȂԄɆTreatment outcome ɇȞє Clinical EfficacyȃTreatment Effectiveness ȟȃɆFollow-up studies ɇȃɆPatient satisfaction ɇȂ ܗቩђᄃᡜ೪ॏ ޠɆProspective StudiesɇȃᇅɆPerceptionɇȂ ܗቩђᚠ८ข໕ᐄᜱ ޠMeSH ມȂԄ ɆReference StandardsɇȃɆReference Valuesɇ ȞӤဏມє Reference ValueȃNormal Range ȟȃՎɆData collection ɇȂѠпூ ژ2015ԑ59ڢ6 Ѯѕѿᚂৱϴѐ 28

Upload: others

Post on 23-May-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ð Ú c a ( v 6 7 · Tambone V. 3 2004 About beauty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114(1): 270-1. Ferreira MC. 2005 Who is in control of aesthetic surgery? Aesthetic Plast Surg 2005;

rejuvenation

(outcome)

Bashour 2006 159

1

2, 3

Beauty

Pubmed 5,152Beauty 1,226

Esthetics

Aesthetics 26,949

2,282

Aging Age Factor (MeSH)

outcome

PubMed MeSH Beauty , Esthetics

Aesthetics

Facial

MeSH Treatment outcome

Clinical Efficacy Treatment Effectiveness Follow-up studies Patient

s a t i s f a c t i o n Prospective Studies Perception

MeSH Reference Standards Reference Values

Reference Value Normal Range Data collection

2015 59 6 28

Page 2: ð Ú c a ( v 6 7 · Tambone V. 3 2004 About beauty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114(1): 270-1. Ferreira MC. 2005 Who is in control of aesthetic surgery? Aesthetic Plast Surg 2005;

"Cephalometry" "Anthropometry"

MeSH

Aging Age Factors MeSH

(synthesis)

PubMed MeSH

MeSH Aging Age Factors

477

Aging 163

MeSH

Medline (Accessed on 2015/04/01)

(Text word) (MeSH)Beauty 5,152 1,518Beauty [title] 1,226Beauty or Aesthetics or Esthetics 26,949 9,995

.. [title] 2,282Aging 200,805 309,996Aging or Age factors 681,497 606,554

(Esthetics[mesh] or Beauty[mesh]) AND (Aging[mesh]) 163(Esthetics[mesh] or Beauty[mesh]) AND (Aging[mesh] or

Age factors [mesh])477

2015 59 6 29

Page 3: ð Ú c a ( v 6 7 · Tambone V. 3 2004 About beauty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114(1): 270-1. Ferreira MC. 2005 Who is in control of aesthetic surgery? Aesthetic Plast Surg 2005;

(Attractiveness)

Facial recognitionFacial perception MeSH

MeSH

Bashour 2006

1 2004

(golden rat io)

Persichetti About beauty

3

Bashour (2006)

1 Bashour (facial attractiveness)

About beauty3 Bashour

2006 Lee (oculoplasty)

4 nasolabial fold

SNOMED

ICD-10

2 0 0 9

population-based study (body image)

b o d y dysmorphic disorder 5 Preminger and Fins (professionalism)

guideline

6

2015 59 6 30

Page 4: ð Ú c a ( v 6 7 · Tambone V. 3 2004 About beauty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114(1): 270-1. Ferreira MC. 2005 Who is in control of aesthetic surgery? Aesthetic Plast Surg 2005;

Medline

Wijsbek H. 2000 The pursuit of beauty: the enforcement of aesthetics or a freely adopted lifestyle? J Med Ethics 2000; 26(6): 454-8.

Alam M, Dover JS. 2001 On beauty: evolution, psychosocial considerations, and surgical enhancement. Arch Dermatol 2001; 137(6): 795-807.

Adamson PA, Doud Galli SK.

2003 Modern concepts of beauty. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 11(4): 295-300.

Baig MA. 2004 Surgical enhancement of facial beauty and its psychological significance. Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg 2004; 17: 64-7.

Danikas D, Panagopoulos G.

2004 The golden ratio and proportions of beauty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114(4): 1009.

Persichetti P, Simone P, Tambone V.3

2004 About beauty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114(1): 270-1.

Ferreira MC. 2005 Who is in control of aesthetic surgery? Aesthetic Plast Surg 2005; 29(6): 439-40.

Bashour M.1 2006 History and current concepts in the analysis of facial attractiveness. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118(3): 741-56.

Lee S, Tsirbas A, Goldberg RA, McCann JD.4

2006 Standardized terminology for aesthetic ophthalmic plastic surgery. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 22(5): 371-4.

McCurdy JA, Jr.21 2006 Beautiful eyes: characteristics and application to aesthetic surgery. Facial Plast Surg 2006; 22(3): 204-14.

Javo IM, Sorlie T.5 2009 Psychosocial predictors of an interest in cosmetic surgery among young Norwegian women: a population-based study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124(6): 2142-8.

Preminger BA, Fins JJ.6 2009 Plastic surgery, aesthetics, and medical professionalism: beauty and the eye of the beholder. Ann Plast Surg 2009; 62(4): 340-3.

2004

Perenack (2005)

7 Biller and Kim (2009) 8

2015 59 6 31

Page 5: ð Ú c a ( v 6 7 · Tambone V. 3 2004 About beauty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114(1): 270-1. Ferreira MC. 2005 Who is in control of aesthetic surgery? Aesthetic Plast Surg 2005;

Chauhan (2012)

1.7 8.9

9 Zimm (2013) 3.1

(facial attractiveness) 10

(blindness)

(systematic review)

PubMed MeSH Aging Age Factors

Medline

Wolfort FG, Gee J, Pan D, Morris D.

1997 Nuances of aesthetic blepharoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 1997; 38(3): 257-62.

A u s t i n H W, We s t o n GW, Sigal RK.11

2002 Cosmetic surgery reveals: resolution of the core paradox of cosmetic surgery by a shift in paradigm. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110(6): 1571-2.

Rosen C. 2004 The democratization of beauty. New Atlantis 2004; 5: 19-35.Ferreira MC. 2005 Who is in control of aesthetic surgery? Aesthetic Plast Surg 2005;

29(6): 439-40.Perenack J.7 2005 Treatment options to optimize display of anterior dental esthetics in

the patient with the aged lip. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; 63(11): 1634-41.

Biller JA, Kim DW.8 2009 A contemporary assessment of facial aesthetic preferences. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2009; 11(2): 91-7.

Brooks AT. 2010 Aesthetic anti-ageing surgery and technology: women's friend or foe? Sociol Health Illn 2010; 32(2): 238-57.

Chauhan N, Warner JP, Adamson PA.9

2012 Perceived age change after aesthetic facial surgical procedures quantifying outcomes of aging face surgery. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2012; 14(4): 258-62.

Zimm AJ, Modabber M, Fernandes V, Karimi K, Adamson PA.10

2013 Objective assessment of perceived age reversal and improvement in attractiveness after aging face surgery. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2013; 15(6): 405-10.

2015 59 6 32

Page 6: ð Ú c a ( v 6 7 · Tambone V. 3 2004 About beauty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114(1): 270-1. Ferreira MC. 2005 Who is in control of aesthetic surgery? Aesthetic Plast Surg 2005;

Surgery, plasticRejuvenation

Cosmetic Techniques MeSH

Paradigm shift Austin 2002

Cosmetic surgery reveals beauty 11 2004

(golden ratio) 3

2006

Perenack (2005)

7

1,4

8,

12-14

Bashour

1

MeSH

coding

Face MeSHsubheadings Face/*anatomy

& histology

Face/*anatomy & histologyBeauty 204

facial attractiveness

MeSH Perception subheading

Perception/physiology MRI

9, 10

15

editorial 11

2015 59 6 33

Page 7: ð Ú c a ( v 6 7 · Tambone V. 3 2004 About beauty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114(1): 270-1. Ferreira MC. 2005 Who is in control of aesthetic surgery? Aesthetic Plast Surg 2005;

3, 16, 17

18-20

8 Margraf (2013)

PubeMed/Medline 18

Margraf (2013)

20

1. Bashour M: History and current concepts in the analysis of facial attractiveness. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118(3): 741-56.

2. Adamson PA, Doud Gal l i SK: Modern concepts of beauty. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 11(4): 295-300.

3. Persichetti P, Simone P, Tambone V: About beauty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114(1): 270-1.

4. Lee S , Ts i rbas A, Goldberg RA, e t a l : Standardized terminology for aes thet ic ophthalmic plastic surgery. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 22(5): 371-4.

5. Javo IM, Sorlie T: Psychosocial predictors of an interest in cosmetic surgery among young Norwegian women: a population-based study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124(6): 2142-8.

6. Preminger BA, Fins JJ: Plastic surgery, aesthetics, and medical professionalism: beauty and the eye of the beholder. Ann Plast Surg 2009; 62(4): 340-3.

7. Perenack J: Treatment options to optimize display of anterior dental esthetics in the patient with the aged lip. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; 63(11): 1634-41.

8. B i l l e r J A , K i m D W: A c o n t e m p o r a r y

2015 59 6 34

Page 8: ð Ú c a ( v 6 7 · Tambone V. 3 2004 About beauty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114(1): 270-1. Ferreira MC. 2005 Who is in control of aesthetic surgery? Aesthetic Plast Surg 2005;

assessment of facial aesthetic preferences. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2009; 11(2): 91-7.

9. C h a u h a n N , Wa r n e r J P, A d a m s o n PA : Perceived age change after aesthetic facial surgical procedures quantifying outcomes of aging face surgery. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2012; 14(4): 258-62.

10. Zimm AJ, Modabber M, Fernandes V, et al: Objective assessment of perceived age reversal and improvement in attractiveness after aging face surgery. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2013; 15(6): 405-10.

11. A u s t i n H W, We s t o n G W, S i g a l R K : Cosmetic surgery reveals: resolution of the core paradox of cosmetic surgery by a shift in paradigm. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110(6): 1571-2.

12. Sim RS, Smith JD, Chan AS: Comparison of the aesthetic facial proportions of southern Chinese and white women. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2000; 2(2): 113-20.

13. Fitzgerald R, Graivier MH, Kane M, et al: Facial aesthetic analysis. Aesthet Surg J 2010; 30 Suppl: 25S-27S.

14. Woodard CR, Park SS: Nasal and facial analysis. Clin Plast Surg 2010; 37(2): 181-9.

15. Sepehr A, Chauhan N, Alexander A, et al: The effect of rhinoplasty on perceived age. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2012; 14(1): 68-70.

16. Alam M, Dover JS: On beauty: evolution, psychosocial considerations, and surgical enhancement. Arch Dermatol 2001; 137(6): 795-807.

17. Danikas D, Panagopoulos G: The golden ra t io and propor t ions of beauty. Plas t Reconstr Surg 2004; 114(4): 1009.

18. Margraf J, Meyer AH, Lavallee KL: Well-Being From the Knife? Psychological Effects of Aesthetic Surgery. Clinical Psychological Science 2013; 1(3): 239-52.

19. Rowe-Jones JM: Facial aesthetic surgical goals in patients of different cultures. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2014; 22(3): 343-8.

20. Reilly MJ, Tomsic JA, Fernandez SJ, et al: Effect of Facial Rejuvenation Surgery on Perceived Attractiveness, Femininity, and Personality. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2015.

21. M c C u r d y J A , J r : B e a u t i f u l e y e s : characteristics and application to aesthetic surgery. Facial Plast Surg 2006; 22(3): 204-14.

2015 59 6 35