СПИН – 05 Д У Б Н А Септ. 29, 2005 alessandro bravar spin dependence in polarized p ...
TRANSCRIPT
СПИН – 05Д У Б Н А
Септ. 29, 2005Alessandro Bravar
Spin Dependence in PolarizedSpin Dependence in Polarized
pppp pppp & & ppC C ppCC
Elastic Scattering in the CNI RegionElastic Scattering in the CNI Region
A. Bravar, I. Alekseev, G. Bunce, S. Dhawan, R. Gill,
H. Huang, W. Haeberli, G. Igo, O. Jinnouchi, K. Kurita, Y. Makdisi,
A. Nass, H. Okada, N. Saito, H. Spinka, E. Stephenson,
D. Svirida, C. Whitten, T. Wise, J. Wood, A. Zelenski
С П И Н 0 5 Alessandro Bravar
RHIC beams +internal targets fixed target modes ~ 14 GeV
The Elastic Process: KinematicsThe Elastic Process: Kinematics
recoil protonor Carbon
(polarized)proton beam
scatteredproton
02 inout pptpolarized
proton targetor Carbon target
essentially 1 free parameter:
momentum transfer t = (p3 – p1)2 = (p4 – p2)
2 <0
+ center of mass energy s = (p1 + p2)2 = (p3 – p4)
2
+ azimuthal angle if polarized !
elastic pp kinematics fully constrained by recoil proton only !
С П И Н 0 5 Alessandro Bravar
||||,
||,
||,
||,
||,
5
4
3
2
1
MMts
Mts
Mts
Mts
Mts
Helicity Amplitudes for spin ½ ½ Helicity Amplitudes for spin ½ ½ ½ ½ ½½Scattering process described in terms of Helicity Amplitudes i
All dynamics contained in the Scattering Matrix M(Spin) Cross Sections expressed in terms of
spin non–flip
double spin flip
spin non–flip
double spin flip
single spin flip
? M
identical spin ½ particles
formalism well developed, however not much data !
only AN studied / measured to some extent
observables:
3 -sections
5 spin asymmetries
4321*52 Im
4),(
sdtd
tsAN
NA
4*32
*1
252 Re2
4),(
sdtd
tsANN
NNA
С П И Н 0 5 Alessandro Bravar
Cross Sections in Terms of Cross Sections in Terms of i
total section
differential section
longitudinalsection
transversesection
opticaltheorem
unpolarized: avarage over all initial states ( and ) and sum over all final states (, , )polarized: study specific spin configurations
С П И Н 0 5 Alessandro Bravar
The Very Low The Very Low tt Region Regionaround t ~ 103 (GeV/c)2 Ahadronic ACoulomb
INTERFERENCE
CNI = Coulomb – Nuclear Interferencescattering amplitudes modified to include also electromagnetic contribution
hadronic interaction described in terms of Pomeron (Reggeon) exchange
electromagnetic single photon exchange
= |Ahadronic + ACoulomb|2
unpolarized clearly visible in the cross section d/dt charge
polarized “left – right” asymmetry AN magnetic moment
+P
iemi
hadi
hadi e
С П И Н 0 5 Alessandro Bravar
the left – right scattering asymmetry AN arises from the interference of
the spin non-flip amplitude with the spin flip amplitude (Schwinger)
in absence of hadronic spin – flip contributions
AN is exactly calculable (Lapidus & Kopeliovich):
hadronic spin- flip modifies the QED“predictions”
interpreted in terms of Pomeron spin – flip and parametrized as
AANN & Coulomb Nuclear Interference & Coulomb Nuclear Interference
hadflipnon
hadflip
hadflipnon
emflipN CCA *
2*
1
1)p pp
had
Zt
yy
y
m
ZA
pAtot
pAtotp
N 81
1
82
2/3
2
25 2
1
2
1
2
1II ppp
AN (t)
had
p
had
m
ts
)(5
С П И Н 0 5 Alessandro Bravar
can be traced back to
С П И Н 0 5 Alessandro Bravar
Some ASome AN N measurements in the CNI measurements in the CNI regionregion
pp Analyzing Power
no hadronicspin-flip
-t
AN
(%)
E704@FNALp = 200 GeV/cPRD48(93)3026
E950@BNLp = 21.7 GeV/cPRL89(02)052302
with hadonicspin-flip
no hadronicspin-flip
pC Analyzing Power
r5pC Fs
had / Im F0had
Re r5 = 0.088 0.058
Im r5 = 0.161 0.226
highly anti-correlated
С П И Н 0 5 Alessandro Bravar
polarimeters
С П И Н 0 5 Alessandro Bravar
RHIC RHIC pppp accelerator complex accelerator complex
BRAHMS & PP2PP
STARPHENIX
AGS
LINACBOOSTER
Pol. Proton Source
Spin Rotators
20% Snake
Siberian Snakes
200 MeV polarimeter
AGS quasi-elastic polarimeter
Rf Dipoles
RHIC pC “CNI” polarimeters
PHOBOS
RHIC
absolute pHpolarimeter
SiberianSnakes
AGS pC “CNI” polarimeter
5% Snake
С П И Н 0 5 Alessandro Bravar
GNN
NN
PA
BLL
2
1
NN
NN
PA
BN
1
Polarimetry : Impact on RHIC Spin Polarimetry : Impact on RHIC Spin PhysicsPhysics
measured spin asymmetries normalized by PB to extract Physics Spin Observables
RHIC Spin Program requires Pbeam / Pbeam ~ 0.05 normalization scale uncertainty
polarimetric process with large and known AN
– pC elastic scattering in CNI region, AN ~ 1 %
– fast measurements
– requires absolute calibration polarized gas jet target
Physics AsymmetriesSingle Spin Asymmetries
Double Spin Asymmetries
measurements
rightleft
rightleft
NB NN
NN
AP
1
recoil
С П И Н 0 5 Alessandro Bravar
pppp p pp p
С П И Н 0 5 Alessandro Bravar
pppp pppp and and pppp pppp with a Polarized Gas Jet Targetwith a Polarized Gas Jet Target
LRRL
LRRL
TN
NNNN
NNNNP
A1
NN
NNPP
ABT
NN1
RHIC polarizedProton beams
polarizedgas JETtarget
ANbeam (t ) AN
target (t )
for elastic scattering only!
Pbeam = Ptarget . B / T
С П И Н 0 5 Alessandro Bravar
The Atomic H Beam The Atomic H Beam SourceSource
separationmagnets(sextupoles)
H2 dissociator
Breit-Rabipolarimeter
focusingmagnets(sextupoles)
RF transitions
holding field magnet
recoil detectorsrecord beam intensity100% eff. RF transitionsfocusing high intensityB-R polarimeter
OR
Pz+ OR Pz
-
H = p+ + e-
С П И Н 0 5 Alessandro Bravar
the JET ran with an average intensity of 11017 atoms / sec
the JET thickness of 1 1012 atoms/cm2 record intensity
target polarization cycle+/0/- ~ 500 / 50 / 500 sec
polarization to be scaled
down due to a ~3% H2
background:
Ptarget ~ 0.924 ± 0.018
(current understanding)
no depolarization from beamwake fields observed !
JET target polarization & performanceJET target polarization & performance
С П И Н 0 5 Alessandro Bravar
The Polarized Jet Target under The Polarized Jet Target under developmentdevelopment
Dissociator stage
Baffle locationSextupoles 1-4
Sextupoles 5-6
Profile measurement
BRP vacuum vessel
Electronics racks
Turbo pump controllers
Dissociator RF systems
Vac. gauges monitors
Target chamber &beam pipe adapters
Recoil spectrometer silicon detectors
С П И Н 0 5 Alessandro Bravar
Recoil Si spectrometerRecoil Si spectrometer
6 Si detectors coveringthe blue beam =>MEASURE energy (res. < 50 keV) time of flight (res. < 2 ns) scattering angle (res. ~ 5 mrad)of recoil protons frompp pp elastic scattering
HAVE “design”azimuthal coverage
one Si layer only smaller energy range reduced bkg rejection power
B
С П И Н 0 5 Alessandro Bravar
KinematicsKinematics
R; ER; tof
S
essentially 1 free parameter: t (+ ) elastic pp kinematics fully constrained by recoil proton only !
pbeam
p
m
t
p
mR 2
||1sin
measure position and energy of recoil
kinTmt p2
R & t
t : 0.001 – 0.02 GeV2
R : 1 – 5 degrees
Tkin : 0.5 – 10 MeV
pR : 30 – 140 MeV
|t| : 0.001 – 0.02 GeV2
R : 1 – 5 degrees
Tkin : 0.5 – 10 MeV
pR : 30 – 140 MeV/c
tof : 100 – 20 nsec (@ 1m)
DmTtof pkin /2/1 additional kinematical constraint
R & ER mbeam (MX); tof & ER mtarget
С П И Н 0 5 Alessandro Bravar
Jet-Target Holding Magnetic Field Jet-Target Holding Magnetic Field (1.0)(1.0)
Bdl ~ 0
disp
lace
men
t (cm
)
B
z (G
auss
)
p = 30 MeV/c (|t|~10-3)
p = 100 MeV/c (|t|~10-2)
+ - +
1.0 kGauss Helmholtz coils
almost no effect on recoilproton trajectories:
left – right hit profiles &left – right acceptancesalmost equal(also under reversal ofholding field)
С П И Н 0 5 Alessandro Bravar
pppp elastic data collected elastic data collected
Hor. pos. of Jet 10000 cts. = 2.5 mm
Num
ber
of e
last
ic p
p ev
ents
FWHM ~ 6 mmas designed
• recoil protons unambiguously identified !
• 100 GeV ~ 3 106 events for 1.5 10–3 < -t < 3.5 10–2 GeV2
• 24 GeV ~ 300 k events
CNI peak AN
1 < E REC < 2 MeV prompt eventsand beam-gas
sourcecalibration
recoil protons elastic pp ppscattering
background118 cts. subtracted
JET Profile: measured selecting ppelastic events
ToF vs EREC correlation
Tkin= ½ MR(dist/ToF)2
ToF < 8 ns
С П И Н 0 5 Alessandro Bravar
TDC vs ADC individual channels
Energy - Position correlationsEnergy - Position correlationsTkin 2 (i.e. position2)
pp elastic events clearly identified !
full
y ab
sorb
ed p
roto
nspu
nch
thro
ugh
prot
ons
reco
il e
nerg
y
punch throughrecoil protons
position
С П И Н 0 5 Alessandro Bravar
not corrected for themagnetic field
MX2 [GeV2]
Mp2
inelasticthreshold
num
ber
of e
vent
s (a
. u.)
FWHM ~ 0.1 GeV2
MM22XX (GeV(GeV22))proton
MM22X X distributiondistribution
80 cm from targetconvoluted withspectrometerResolution
MM22XX~ 0.1 GeV22
Missing Mass MMissing Mass MXX2 2 @ 100 GeV@ 100 GeV
MM22XX
simulations
С П И Н 0 5 Alessandro Bravar
AANN for for ppp p pp pp @ 100 GeV @ 100 GeV
prel
imin
ary
source ofsystematic errors:
1 PTARGET = 2 %
2 from backgrounds & event selections
< 0.00163 false asymmetries: small
similar to statistical errors
С П И Н 0 5 Alessandro Bravar
AANN for for ppp p pp pp @ 100 GeV @ 100 GeVpr
elim
inar
ydata compared toCNI prediction
[TOT = 38.5 mbarn,
= -0.07, = 0.02]
2 ~ 12 / 14 d.o.f.
no need of a hadronic spin – flip contribution to describe these data
no hadronicspin-flip
С П И Н 0 5 Alessandro Bravar
and with the hadronic spin-flip term and with the hadronic spin-flip term
prel
imin
ary Im r5 = 0.002 0.029
Re r5 = -0.006 0.007
2/ndf = 10 / 12
uncertainty on the( = 0.03) parametercan change at the same level
hadhad
p
had
m
tsr 3155 2)(
with hadronic
spin-flip
stat + sys errors used in fits
hadronic spin – flip contribution consistent with zero (1 level)
in the simplest assumption:spin-flip prop. to non-flip ampli.
С П И Н 0 5 Alessandro Bravar
AANNNN for for pppp pp pp @ 100 GeV @ 100 GeV
prel
imin
ary
source ofsystematic errors:
1 PT2 = 3 %
2 from backgrounds and event selections
~ 0.0013 rel. luminosity ~ 0.001
similar to stat. errors
NNB
T
TBTNN PPP
A
2
11
ANN basically 0 double spin – flip amplitudes (2 and 4)
are very small / do not contribute in this region
statistical errors only
С П И Н 0 5 Alessandro Bravar
ppC C p p CC
С П И Н 0 5 Alessandro Bravar
Setup for Setup for ppC scattering – C scattering – the RHIC the RHIC polarimeterspolarimeters
recoil carbon ions scattered around 90o
detected with Silicon strip detectors
polar acceptance± 1.5o around 90o
2 72 channels read out with WFD
very large cross section very fast measurements
statistics per measurement (~ 20 106 events) allows detailed analysis
beamdirection
1
34
5
6
RHIC 2 rings
2
Si strip detectors(ToF, EC)
~36cm
inside RHIC ring @IP12Ultra thin Carbon
ribbon Target(3.5g/cm2 , < 10m)
С П И Н 0 5 Alessandro Bravar
DAQ and WFDDAQ and WFD
ADC3140 MHz
synchronized to accelerator clocks
bunch -ing “start” TDC
“online” analysis of waveformperformed beteween consecutive
bunch -ing PH, tot Q, t.o.f.; full waveform (JET)
~50ns
~100mV
FPGA
onboardmemory
t ~ 2 nsE < 50 keV
DAQ PC
20 106 events in 20 seconds deadtimeless DAQ systemcan accept, analyze, and store 1 event / each bunch -ing
Wave Form Digitizer = peak sensing ADC, CFD, …
common to the pC and JET DAQ system
С П И Н 0 5 Alessandro Bravar
Si Detector design and energy lossSi Detector design and energy loss
at t ~ -0.01 (GeV/c)2, Energy of recoil Carbon Ekin ~ few 100 keV
( Ekin = -t / 2MC )
range in Silicon, only fraction of micrometersubstantial fraction of Carbon energy lost in entrance window (up to 50%)correct Ekin for energy loss energy scale error
important to minimize energy losses in entrance window of detectoractive area
24 x 12 mm2
thickness400
twelve 2 mm wideDC coupled strips
top view of Si strip
p+ implants~150 nm deep
charge collectionAl electrodes
n type Si wafer
n+ implants and Al backplane
С П И Н 0 5 Alessandro Bravar
Event Selection & PerformanceEvent Selection & Performance
- very clean data, background < 1 % within “banana” cut- good separation of recoil carbon from (C* X) and prompts
may allow going to very high |t| values
- (Tof) < 10 ns ( ~ 1 GeV)
- very high rate: 105 ev / ch / sec
EC, keV
TOF, nsTypical mass reconstruction
Carbon
AlphaC*
PromptsAlpha
Carbon
Prompts
MR, GeV
MR ~ 11 GeV
~ 1 GeV
Tkin= ½ MR(dist/ToF)2
non-relativistic kinematics
С П И Н 0 5 Alessandro Bravar
AANN ppCC p pC at 3.9, 6.5, 9.7 & 21.7 GeVC at 3.9, 6.5, 9.7 & 21.7 GeV
only statistical errorsare shown
normalization errors: ~ 10 % (at 3.9) ~ 15 % (at 6.5) ~ 20 % (at 21.7)
systematic errors: < 20 % - backgrounds - pileup - RF noise
recoil Carbon energy (keV)
p = 3.9 GeV
p = 21.7 GeV
p = 9.7 GeV
prel
imin
ary
2003
+ 2
004
data
CNIpeak~ 4 %
PB~ 73 %
PB ~ 65 %
PB ~ 47 %
p = 6.5 GeV
AN (
%)
momentum transfer –t (GeV2/c2)
PB ~ 60 %
statistical errors only
(AGS)
С П И Н 0 5 Alessandro Bravar
AANN ppCC p pC: Energy DependenceC: Energy DependenceA
N (
%)
Beam Energy (GeV)
prel
imin
ary
2003
+ 2
004
data
t = - 0.01 GeV2
t = - 0.02 GeV2
t = - 0.03 GeV2
t = - 0.04 GeV2
statistical errors only
only statistical errorsare shownsystematic errorsas for previous slide
E ?Asymptotic regime
No energy dependence ?
С П И Н 0 5 Alessandro Bravar
Raw asymmetry (Raw asymmetry (tt) @ 100 GeV ) @ 100 GeV (RHIC)(RHIC)
X-90X-90
X-45X-45
X-averageX-average
Regular calibration measurementsRegular calibration measurements
Cross asymmetryCross asymmetryRadial asymmetryRadial asymmetry
False asymmetry ~0
higher higher –t–t range range
False asymmetry ~0
good agreement btw X90 vs. X45
0.020.01
0.02 0.03 0.04-t (GeV/c)2
-t (GeV/c)2
Regular polarimeter runsRegular polarimeter runsmeasurements taken measurements taken
simultaneously with Jet -simultaneously with Jet -targettarget
very stable behavior of very stable behavior of measured asymmetriesmeasured asymmetries
Polarimeter dedicated runs (high Polarimeter dedicated runs (high -t-t))Signal attenuation (x1/2) to reach higher Signal attenuation (x1/2) to reach higher –t –t
Normalized at overlap region to regular runs Normalized at overlap region to regular runs
Zero crossing measured with large significanceZero crossing measured with large significance
prel
imin
ary
С П И Н 0 5 Alessandro Bravar
ppC Systematics:C Systematics: each detector channel covers same t range
72 independent measurements of AN
width ~stat. error
single meas.
channel by channel raw asymmetry
sources of systematic uncertainties:
1 PBEAM = 7.8 % (normalization)
[PBEAM = 0.386 0.030, stat. error]
2 energy scale ~ 50 keV for lowest |t| bin (from “energy correction”) NB these are “external” factors
not “intrinsic” limitations
Fit with sine function (phase fixed)Fit with sine function (phase fixed)
С П И Н 0 5 Alessandro Bravar
AANN for for ppCC p pC @ 100 GeVC @ 100 GeV
no hadronicspin-flip
with hadronicspin-flip
“forbidden” asymmetries
systematicuncertainty
best fit withhadronic spin-flip
Kopeliovich –Truemann modelPRD64 (01) 034004hep-ph/0305085
r5pC Fs
had / Im F0had
prel
imin
arystatistical errors only
spread of r5 values
from syst. uncertainties
1 contour
С П И Н 0 5 Alessandro Bravar
SummarySummary measured AN
pp and ANNpp for elastic pp pp scattering at 100 GeV
with very high accuracy (statistical and systematic)
– |t| range: 0.0015 < |t| < 0.035 (GeV/c)2
AN data well described by CNI – QED predictions (Schwinger – Lapidus)these data do not require a hadronic spin-flip term
ANN ~ 0 over whole range with no “structure” (i.e. t – dependence)
measured ANpC for elastic pC pC scattering at 100 GeV (RHIC)
– zero crossing around |t| ~ 0.03 (GeV/c)2
pC data require substantial hadronic spin-flip !
measured ANpC for pC pC scattering over 3.5 < Eb < 24 GeV (AGS)
– Eb < 10 GeV/c: almost no t dependence & departure from “CNI” shape